• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乐观的元认知判断预测在相对复杂的视觉任务中表现不佳。

Optimistic metacognitive judgments predict poor performance in relatively complex visual tasks.

机构信息

Vanderbilt University, United States.

Vanderbilt University, United States.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2019 Sep;74:102781. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102781. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2019.102781
PMID:31319238
Abstract

In some cases, people overestimate how much they can see. This can produce a metacognitive blind spot that may lead participants to devote fewer cognitive resources than a visual task demands. However, little research has tested whether individuals who are particularly optimistic about their visual capabilities are susceptible to poor visual performance. We tested whether optimistic metacognitive judgments would predict poor performance in a visual task, especially when it placed a large attentional load on the participant, and when it required balancing between multiple sources of information. We tested participants in a simplified battle command simulation in which they were asked to detect visual changes. Participants who predicted spatially expansive visual attention performance performed more poorly in the change detection task when the task required tracking larger numbers of aircraft, and when it included a secondary change-list display.

摘要

在某些情况下,人们会高估自己的观察能力。这可能会产生元认知盲点,导致参与者投入的认知资源少于视觉任务所需的资源。然而,很少有研究测试过那些对自己的视觉能力过于乐观的人是否容易出现视觉表现不佳的情况。我们测试了乐观的元认知判断是否会预测视觉任务中的表现不佳,特别是当它对参与者施加了大量的注意力负荷,并且需要在多个信息源之间进行平衡时。我们在简化的战斗指挥模拟中对参与者进行了测试,要求他们检测视觉变化。当任务需要跟踪更多数量的飞机,并且包括次要的变化列表显示时,那些预测空间扩展视觉注意力表现的参与者在变化检测任务中的表现更差。

相似文献

1
Optimistic metacognitive judgments predict poor performance in relatively complex visual tasks.乐观的元认知判断预测在相对复杂的视觉任务中表现不佳。
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Sep;74:102781. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102781. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
2
Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments.元认知判断背后的特定领域和一般领域过程。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Mar;49:264-277. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
3
Are errors detected before they occur? Early error sensations revealed by metacognitive judgments on the timing of error awareness.是否能在错误发生之前检测到错误?通过对错误意识时间的元认知判断揭示的早期错误感觉。
Conscious Cogn. 2020 Jan;77:102857. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102857. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
4
Resilience of perceptual metacognition in a dual-task paradigm.双重任务范式下知觉元认知的恢复力
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Dec;27(6):1259-1268. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01779-8.
5
Confident failures: Lapses of working memory reveal a metacognitive blind spot.自信的失败:工作记忆的失误揭示了一个元认知盲点。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jul;79(5):1506-1523. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1331-8.
6
Consistency, not speed: temporal regularity as a metacognitive cue.一致性,而非速度:时间规律性作为元认知线索。
Psychol Res. 2020 Feb;84(1):88-98. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-0973-z. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
7
Learning by heart-the relationship between resting vagal tone and metacognitive judgments: a pilot study.用心学习——静息迷走神经张力与元认知判断之间的关系:一项初步研究。
Cogn Process. 2018 Nov;19(4):557-561. doi: 10.1007/s10339-018-0865-6. Epub 2018 May 23.
8
Metacognitive judgements of perceptual-motor steering performance.对感知运动转向性能的元认知判断
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Oct;71(10):2223-2234. doi: 10.1177/1747021817737496. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
9
Assessing metacognition during or after basic-level and high-level cognitive tasks? A comparative study in a non-clinical sample.在基础认知任务或高级认知任务期间或之后评估元认知?一项非临床样本的比较研究。
Encephale. 2020 Feb;46(1):3-6. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
10
Sure I'm Sure: Prefrontal Oscillations Support Metacognitive Monitoring of Decision Making.确信即确信:前额叶振荡支持决策的元认知监控。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 25;37(4):781-789. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1612-16.2016.

引用本文的文献

1
How do drivers mitigate the effects of naturalistic visual complexity? : On attentional strategies and their implications under a change blindness protocol.驾驶员如何减轻自然视觉复杂性的影响?:在变化盲视协议下的注意力策略及其影响
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Aug 9;8(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00501-1.