• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patterns of Surveillance Advanced Imaging and Serum Tumor Biomarker Testing Following Launch of the Choosing Wisely Initiative.选择明智倡议推出后,监测先进成像和血清肿瘤生物标志物检测的模式。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jul 1;17(7):813-820. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7281.
2
Use of posttreatment imaging and biomarkers in survivors of early-stage breast cancer: Inappropriate surveillance or necessary care?早期乳腺癌幸存者中治疗后影像学检查和生物标志物的应用:是不恰当的监测还是必要的护理?
Cancer. 2016 Mar 15;122(6):908-16. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29811. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
3
Baseline Estimates of Adherence to American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Board of Internal Medicine Choosing Wisely Initiative Among Patients With Cancer Enrolled With a Large Regional Commercial Health Insurer.在一家大型地区商业健康保险公司参保的癌症患者中,对美国临床肿瘤学会/美国内科医学委员会明智选择倡议的依从性基线估计。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Jul;11(4):338-43. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.002717. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
4
Factors associated with imaging in patients with early breast cancer after initial treatment.早期乳腺癌患者初始治疗后与影像学相关的因素。
Curr Oncol. 2018 Apr;25(2):126-132. doi: 10.3747/co.25.3838. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
5
A National Study of the Use of Asymptomatic Systemic Imaging for Surveillance Following Breast Cancer Treatment (AFT-01).一项关于乳腺癌治疗后无症状全身系统影像学监测应用的全国性研究(AFT-01)。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;25(9):2587-2595. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6496-4. Epub 2018 May 17.
6
Clinical Impact of ASCO Choosing Wisely Guidelines on Staging Imaging for Early-Stage Breast Cancers: A Time Series Analysis Using SEER-Medicare Data.ASCO 明智选择指南对早期乳腺癌分期成像的临床影响:使用 SEER-医疗保险数据的时间序列分析。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Feb;19(2):e274-e285. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00500. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
7
Tumor marker usage and medical care costs among older early-stage breast cancer survivors.老年早期乳腺癌幸存者的肿瘤标志物使用情况与医疗费用。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 10;33(2):149-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.5409. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
8
Use of imaging and biomarker tests for posttreatment care of early-stage breast cancer survivors.早期乳腺癌幸存者治疗后护理中应用影像学和生物标志物检测。
Cancer. 2013 Dec 15;119(24):4316-24. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28363. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
9
Variation in the use of advanced imaging at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in a statewide registry.在一个全州范围的登记系统中,乳腺癌诊断时先进成像技术使用情况的差异。
Cancer. 2017 Aug 1;123(15):2975-2983. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30674. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
10
Advanced imaging modalities in early stage breast cancer: preoperative use in the United States Medicare population.早期乳腺癌的高级影像学检查方法:美国医疗保险人群的术前应用。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jan;20(1):102-10. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2571-4. Epub 2012 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The lingering mysteries of metastatic recurrence in breast cancer.乳腺癌转移复发的未解之谜。
Br J Cancer. 2021 Jan;124(1):13-26. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01161-4. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
2
A scoping review characterizing "Choosing Wisely®" recommendations for breast cancer management.一项针对“明智选择(Choosing Wisely®)”推荐用于乳腺癌管理的特征描述的范围综述。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Feb;185(3):533-547. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-06009-2. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
3
Choosing Wisely® in Hematology: Have We Made a Difference?明智选择®在血液学:我们有何不同?
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2020 Aug;15(4):241-247. doi: 10.1007/s11899-020-00593-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Geographic Variation in Postoperative Imaging for Low-Risk Breast Cancer.低危乳腺癌术后影像学检查的地域差异。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Jul;16(7):829-837. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7024.
2
A National Study of the Use of Asymptomatic Systemic Imaging for Surveillance Following Breast Cancer Treatment (AFT-01).一项关于乳腺癌治疗后无症状全身系统影像学监测应用的全国性研究(AFT-01)。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;25(9):2587-2595. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6496-4. Epub 2018 May 17.
3
Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Recommendations From the ACR.乳腺癌筛查在高于平均风险的女性中的应用:来自 ACR 的建议。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Mar;15(3 Pt A):408-414. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.11.034. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
4
Choosing Wisely in Oncology: Are We Ready For Value-Based Care?肿瘤学中的明智选择:我们准备好迎接基于价值的医疗了吗?
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Nov;13(11):e935-e943. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.019281. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
5
Overuse of Health Care Services in the Management of Cancer: A Systematic Review.癌症管理中医疗保健服务的过度使用:一项系统综述。
Med Care. 2017 Jul;55(7):723-733. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000734.
6
Variation in the use of advanced imaging at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in a statewide registry.在一个全州范围的登记系统中,乳腺癌诊断时先进成像技术使用情况的差异。
Cancer. 2017 Aug 1;123(15):2975-2983. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30674. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
7
Advanced Imaging and Receipt of Guideline Concordant Care in Women with Early Stage Breast Cancer.早期乳腺癌女性的高级成像与符合指南的护理接受情况
Int J Breast Cancer. 2016;2016:2182985. doi: 10.1155/2016/2182985. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
8
Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016.癌症治疗和生存统计,2016 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jul;66(4):271-89. doi: 10.3322/caac.21349. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
9
Use of posttreatment imaging and biomarkers in survivors of early-stage breast cancer: Inappropriate surveillance or necessary care?早期乳腺癌幸存者中治疗后影像学检查和生物标志物的应用:是不恰当的监测还是必要的护理?
Cancer. 2016 Mar 15;122(6):908-16. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29811. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
10
Advanced Imaging Utilization Trends in Privately Insured Patients From 2007 to 2013.2007年至2013年私人保险患者的先进成像使用趋势
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Dec;12(12 Pt B):1380-1387.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.09.013.

选择明智倡议推出后,监测先进成像和血清肿瘤生物标志物检测的模式。

Patterns of Surveillance Advanced Imaging and Serum Tumor Biomarker Testing Following Launch of the Choosing Wisely Initiative.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and.

Department of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center.

出版信息

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jul 1;17(7):813-820. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7281.

DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2018.7281
PMID:31319393
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9311311/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess advanced imaging (bone scan, CT, or PET/CT) and serum tumor biomarker use in asymptomatic breast cancer survivors during the surveillance period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cancer registry records for 2,923 women diagnosed with primary breast cancer in Washington State between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2014, were linked with claims data from 2 regional commercial insurance plans. Clinical data including demographic and tumor characteristics were collected. Evaluation and management codes from claims data were used to determine advanced imaging and serum tumor biomarker testing during the peridiagnostic and surveillance phases of care. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify clinical factors and patterns of peridiagnostic imaging and biomarker testing associated with surveillance advanced imaging.

RESULTS

Of 2,923 eligible women, 16.5% (n=480) underwent surveillance advanced imaging and 31.8% (n=930) received surveillance serum tumor biomarker testing. Compared with women diagnosed before the launch of the Choosing Wisely campaign in 2012, later diagnosis was associated with lower use of surveillance advanced imaging (odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52-0.89). Factors significantly associated with use of surveillance advanced imaging included increasing disease stage (stage III: OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 2.48-5.38), peridiagnostic advanced imaging use (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.33-2.31), and peridiagnostic serum tumor biomarker testing (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.01-1.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Although use of surveillance advanced imaging in asymptomatic breast cancer survivors has declined since the launch of the Choosing Wisely campaign, frequent use of surveillance serum tumor biomarker testing remains prevalent, representing a potential target for further efforts to reduce low-value practices.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估无症状乳腺癌幸存者在监测期间使用高级影像学(骨扫描、CT 或 PET/CT)和血清肿瘤生物标志物的情况。

患者和方法

将华盛顿州 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日期间诊断为原发性乳腺癌的 2923 名女性的癌症登记记录与来自 2 个地区商业保险计划的索赔数据相链接。收集了包括人口统计学和肿瘤特征在内的临床数据。从索赔数据中使用评估和管理代码来确定诊断前和监测阶段的高级影像学和血清肿瘤生物标志物检测。使用多变量逻辑回归模型来确定与监测高级影像学相关的临床因素和诊断前影像学及生物标志物检测模式。

结果

在 2923 名合格女性中,16.5%(n=480)接受了监测高级影像学检查,31.8%(n=930)接受了监测血清肿瘤生物标志物检测。与在 2012 年“明智选择”运动启动之前诊断的女性相比,较晚的诊断与监测高级影像学使用率较低相关(比值比 [OR],0.68;95%置信区间,0.52-0.89)。与使用监测高级影像学显著相关的因素包括疾病分期增加(III 期:OR,3.65;95%置信区间,2.48-5.38)、诊断前高级影像学的使用(OR,1.76;95%置信区间,1.33-2.31)和诊断前血清肿瘤生物标志物检测(OR,1.35;95%置信区间,1.01-1.80)。

结论

尽管自“明智选择”运动启动以来,无症状乳腺癌幸存者的监测高级影像学使用率有所下降,但监测血清肿瘤生物标志物检测的频繁使用仍然普遍存在,这代表了进一步努力减少低价值实践的潜在目标。