Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and.
Department of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jul 1;17(7):813-820. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7281.
The purpose of this study was to assess advanced imaging (bone scan, CT, or PET/CT) and serum tumor biomarker use in asymptomatic breast cancer survivors during the surveillance period.
Cancer registry records for 2,923 women diagnosed with primary breast cancer in Washington State between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2014, were linked with claims data from 2 regional commercial insurance plans. Clinical data including demographic and tumor characteristics were collected. Evaluation and management codes from claims data were used to determine advanced imaging and serum tumor biomarker testing during the peridiagnostic and surveillance phases of care. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify clinical factors and patterns of peridiagnostic imaging and biomarker testing associated with surveillance advanced imaging.
Of 2,923 eligible women, 16.5% (n=480) underwent surveillance advanced imaging and 31.8% (n=930) received surveillance serum tumor biomarker testing. Compared with women diagnosed before the launch of the Choosing Wisely campaign in 2012, later diagnosis was associated with lower use of surveillance advanced imaging (odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52-0.89). Factors significantly associated with use of surveillance advanced imaging included increasing disease stage (stage III: OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 2.48-5.38), peridiagnostic advanced imaging use (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.33-2.31), and peridiagnostic serum tumor biomarker testing (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.01-1.80).
Although use of surveillance advanced imaging in asymptomatic breast cancer survivors has declined since the launch of the Choosing Wisely campaign, frequent use of surveillance serum tumor biomarker testing remains prevalent, representing a potential target for further efforts to reduce low-value practices.
本研究旨在评估无症状乳腺癌幸存者在监测期间使用高级影像学(骨扫描、CT 或 PET/CT)和血清肿瘤生物标志物的情况。
将华盛顿州 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日期间诊断为原发性乳腺癌的 2923 名女性的癌症登记记录与来自 2 个地区商业保险计划的索赔数据相链接。收集了包括人口统计学和肿瘤特征在内的临床数据。从索赔数据中使用评估和管理代码来确定诊断前和监测阶段的高级影像学和血清肿瘤生物标志物检测。使用多变量逻辑回归模型来确定与监测高级影像学相关的临床因素和诊断前影像学及生物标志物检测模式。
在 2923 名合格女性中,16.5%(n=480)接受了监测高级影像学检查,31.8%(n=930)接受了监测血清肿瘤生物标志物检测。与在 2012 年“明智选择”运动启动之前诊断的女性相比,较晚的诊断与监测高级影像学使用率较低相关(比值比 [OR],0.68;95%置信区间,0.52-0.89)。与使用监测高级影像学显著相关的因素包括疾病分期增加(III 期:OR,3.65;95%置信区间,2.48-5.38)、诊断前高级影像学的使用(OR,1.76;95%置信区间,1.33-2.31)和诊断前血清肿瘤生物标志物检测(OR,1.35;95%置信区间,1.01-1.80)。
尽管自“明智选择”运动启动以来,无症状乳腺癌幸存者的监测高级影像学使用率有所下降,但监测血清肿瘤生物标志物检测的频繁使用仍然普遍存在,这代表了进一步努力减少低价值实践的潜在目标。