J Phys Act Health. 2019 Sep 1;16(9):785-791. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0667. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
To maintain increases in physical activity (PA), interventions that implement group dynamics principles and strategies with the intent of enhancing group cohesion may be advantageous. This study examined group cohesion and PA following a group dynamics-based PA intervention among breast cancer survivors.
The study was designed as a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing an 8-week group dynamics-based intervention with an individually supervised intervention. Group cohesion was measured by the Physical Activity Group Environment Questionnaire, and PA was measured at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up using a self-report questionnaire and pedometer.
Group cohesion levels were high following the intervention and positively associated with PA at 3-month follow-up (ranger = .182-.555). At 3-month follow-up, 91.7% of participants in the group-dynamics-based intervention (n = 12) were classified as moderately active or greater, compared with 54.5% in the individually supervised intervention (n = 11).
These results suggest that, for breast cancer survivors, peer support and fostering group cohesion as part of an exercise program may help to support PA following the completion of a structured intervention. A larger trial with longer follow-up is needed to establish comparative efficacy for a group-dynamics-based exercise intervention to enhance long-term PA adherence in breast cancer survivors.
为了保持身体活动(PA)的增加,实施旨在增强群体凝聚力的群体动力学原则和策略的干预措施可能是有利的。本研究在乳腺癌幸存者中进行了一项基于群体动力学的 PA 干预后,考察了群体凝聚力和 PA。
该研究设计为一项随机对照试验,比较了 8 周的基于群体动力学的干预与个体监督干预。使用“身体活动群体环境问卷”测量群体凝聚力,使用自我报告问卷和计步器在基线、干预后和 3 个月随访时测量 PA。
干预后群体凝聚力水平较高,与 3 个月随访时的 PA 呈正相关(范围 =.182-.555)。在 3 个月随访时,基于群体动力学的干预组(n = 12)中 91.7%的参与者被归类为中度活跃或更高,而个体监督干预组(n = 11)中只有 54.5%。
这些结果表明,对于乳腺癌幸存者,同伴支持和培养群体凝聚力作为锻炼计划的一部分,可能有助于在完成结构化干预后支持 PA。需要进行更大规模的试验和更长时间的随访,以确定基于群体动力学的运动干预在增强乳腺癌幸存者长期 PA 依从性方面的比较疗效。