Leach Heather J, Covington Kelley R, Voss Corrine, LeBreton Kelli A, Harden Samantha M, Schuster Steven R
Colorado State University.
Taylor University.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019 Mar 1;46(2):185-197. doi: 10.1188/19.ONF.185-197.
To determine the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a group dynamics-based exercise intervention versus a personal training intervention for increasing physical activity (PA), physical fitness, and quality of life (QOL) in post-treatment breast cancer survivors.
SAMPLE & SETTING: 26 women with stage I or II breast cancer who attended intervention activities at a local academic institution.
METHODS & VRIABLES: Participants were randomly assigned to receive an eight-week intervention in either a group dynamics-based exercise or a personal training setting. Both intervention arms received supervised exercise twice per week, as well as PA education and discussion sessions.
Significant increases were noted in both intervention arms for vigorous PA, chest press, and leg press. Increases in overall QOL and total PA were significant only in the group dynamics-based exercise intervention arm.
The group dynamics-based exercise intervention produced similar improvements in PA and physical fitness compared to the personal training intervention, and it may have facilitated greater improvements in overall QOL.
确定基于群体动力学的运动干预与个人训练干预相比，在提高乳腺癌幸存者治疗后的身体活动（PA）、身体素质和生活质量（QOL）方面的可行性和初步效果。
26名患有I期或II期乳腺癌的女性，她们在当地一所学术机构参加干预活动。
参与者被随机分配接受为期八周的干预，干预方式为基于群体动力学的运动或个人训练。两个干预组每周接受两次有监督的运动，以及PA教育和讨论课程。
两个干预组的剧烈PA、卧推和腿举均显著增加。总体QOL和总PA的增加仅在基于群体动力学的运动干预组中显著。
与个人训练干预相比，基于群体动力学的运动干预在PA和身体素质方面产生了类似的改善，并且可能促进了总体QOL的更大改善。
