J Phys Act Health. 2019 Sep 1;16(9):780-784. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0178. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
This investigation aimed to analyze the agreement between the GT3X accelerometer and the ActivPAL inclinometer for estimating and detecting changes in sedentary behavior of different contexts among adolescents.
Secondary data from an intervention using standing desks in the classroom conducted within 2 sixth-grade classes (intervention [n = 22] and control [n = 27]) were used. The intervention took place over 16 weeks, with activity assessments (ActivPAL and GT3X) being performed 7 days before and in the last week of the intervention. Baseline information from both groups was considered for cross-sectional analysis (209 valid days), while data from 20 participants (intervention group) were used for longitudinal analysis.
The authors observed that GT3X overestimated sedentary time at school (16.8%), after school (13.5%), and during weekends (7.3%) compared with ActivPAL (P < .05). Outside the school (after school [r = -.188] and on weekends [r = -.260]), there was a trend to higher overestimation among adolescents with less sedentary behavior. Longitudinally, the GT3X was unable to detect changes resulting from an intervention in school hours (ActivPAL = -34.7 min·9 h-1 vs GT3X = +6.7 min·9 h-1; P < .05).
The authors conclude that GT3X (cut-point of <100 counts·min-1) overestimated sedentary time of free-living activities and did not detect changes resulting from a classroom standing desk intervention in adolescents.
本研究旨在分析 GT3X 加速度计和 ActivPAL 测斜仪在估计和检测青少年不同情境下久坐行为变化方面的一致性。
使用在两个六年级班级(干预组[n=22]和对照组[n=27])中使用站立式书桌的干预措施的二级数据。干预措施持续了 16 周,在干预前和干预最后一周进行了活动评估(ActivPAL 和 GT3X)。考虑了两组的基线信息进行横断面分析(209 个有效天数),而 20 名参与者(干预组)的数据用于纵向分析。
作者观察到 GT3X 在校内(16.8%)、课后(13.5%)和周末(7.3%)期间高估了久坐时间,而与 ActivPAL 相比(P<.05)。在校外(课后 [r=-.188] 和周末 [r=-.260]),久坐行为较少的青少年有更高的高估趋势。纵向来看,GT3X 无法检测到学校时间干预产生的变化(ActivPAL = -34.7 min·9 h-1 与 GT3X = +6.7 min·9 h-1;P<.05)。
作者得出结论,GT3X(<100 计数·min-1 的切点)高估了自由活动的久坐时间,并且无法检测到课堂站立式书桌干预对青少年产生的变化。