University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK.
University of Murcia, Spain.
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Mar;27(2):567-586. doi: 10.1177/0969733019851542. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
Nurses who work in an emergency department regularly care for acute patients in a fast-paced environment, being at risk of suffering high levels of burnout. This situation makes them especially vulnerable to be accountable for decisions they did not have time to consider or have been pressured into.
The objective of this study was to find which factors influence ethical, legal and professional accountability in nursing practice in an emergency department.
Data were analysed, codified and triangulated using qualitative ethnographic content analysis.
This research is set in a large emergency department in the Midlands area of England. Data were collected from 186 nurses using participant observation, 34 semi-structured interviews with nurses and ethical analysis of 54 applicable clinical policies.
Ethical approval was granted by two research ethics committees and the National Health Service Health Research Authority.
The main result was the clinical nursing accountability cycle model, which showed accountability as a subjective concept that flows between the nurse and the healthcare institution. Moreover, the relations among the clinical nursing accountability factors are also analysed to understand which factors affect decision-making.
The retrospective understanding of the factors that regulate nursing accountability is essential to promote that both the nurse and the healthcare institution take responsibility not only for the direct consequences of their actions but also for the indirect consequences derived from previous decisions.
The decision-making process and the accountability linked to it are affected by several factors that represent the holistic nature of both entities, which are organised and interconnected in a complex grid. This pragmatic interpretation of nursing accountability allows the nurse to comprehend how their decisions are affected, while the healthcare institution could act proactively to avoid any problems before they happen.
在急诊室工作的护士经常在快节奏的环境中照顾急性病患者,因此有很高的倦怠风险。这种情况使他们特别容易对自己没有时间考虑或迫于压力做出的决定负责。
本研究旨在确定影响急诊护理实践中伦理、法律和专业责任的因素。
使用定性民族志内容分析法对数据进行分析、编码和三角剖分。
这项研究是在英格兰中部地区的一个大型急诊室进行的。使用参与式观察收集了 186 名护士的数据,对 34 名护士进行了半结构化访谈,并对 54 项适用的临床政策进行了伦理分析。
两个研究伦理委员会和国家卫生服务健康研究局批准了伦理。
主要结果是临床护理责任周期模型,该模型表明责任是一个主观的概念,在护士和医疗机构之间流动。此外,还分析了临床护理责任因素之间的关系,以了解哪些因素影响决策。
对调节护理责任的因素的回顾性理解对于促进护士和医疗机构不仅对其行动的直接后果负责,而且对源自先前决策的间接后果负责至关重要。
决策过程及其相关责任受到几个因素的影响,这些因素代表了两个实体的整体性质,这些因素以复杂的网格形式组织和相互关联。这种对护理责任的务实解释使护士能够理解他们的决策是如何受到影响的,而医疗机构则可以采取积极主动的措施,在问题发生之前加以避免。