Schneider-Thoma Johannes, Efthimiou Orestis, Bighelli Irene, Dörries Carola, Huhn Maximilian, Krause Marc, Reichelt Leonie, Röder Hannah, Furukawa Toshi A, Davis John M, Leucht Stefan
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;6(9):753-765. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30223-8. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
Antipsychotic drugs might cause acutely occurring, serious side-effects and thus contribute to the increased physical morbidity and mortality observed in patients with severe mental health disorders. We examined this hypothesis by doing a meta-analysis of International Conference on Harmonisation-Good Clinical Practice-defined serious adverse events occurring in placebo-controlled trials of antipsychotics.
For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing second-generation antipsychotics with placebo. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, BIOSIS, PsycINFO, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for trials published in any language from database inception up until Jan 27, 2017. Trials were included without limitations in population (diagnostic category, age, sex, ethnicity), dosing regimen, blinding status, duration, or publication year. Only psychological studies lasting less than 1 day and trials done in mainland China were excluded. We contacted pharmaceutical companies, drug regulatory authorities, and study investigators for additional data. The primary outcome was the number of patients with at least one somatic serious adverse event. We estimated minimum and maximum numbers of patients with the outcome in each study group and synthesised the results with odds ratios (ORs) in a common-effects meta-analysis. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42016033930.
We identified 597 RCTs, comprising 108 664 participants, that met the inclusion criteria. 314 trials (67 642 participants) with details on individual serious adverse events available constituted the main dataset for meta-analysis. 88% of these were 13 weeks (approximately 3 months) or shorter in duration (median 6 weeks, IQR 4-9). At least one somatic serious adverse event occurred in 698 (1·63%) to 862 (2·02%) of 42 600 patients on antipsychotics, and in 343 (1·37%) to 419 (1·67%) of 25 042 patients on placebo. The odds ratios (ORs) were 1·24 (95% CI 1·08-1·42) and 1·24 (1·10-1·41) based on the minimum and maximum estimate, respectively. In predefined subgroup analyses we found evidence suggesting a larger effect in older patients (>65 years; OR 1·56, 95% CI 1·22-1·98; 1·58, 1·25-1·99) as compared with adults (18-65 years; 1·09, 0·91-1·29; 1·10, 0·95-1·28); likewise in children or adolescents (<18 years) although the evidence was more uncertain (1·49, 0·81-2·75; 1·54, 0·85-2·77). Of 597 included RCTs, 30 (5%), 358 (60%), and 209 (35%) were rated at high, moderate, or low risk of bias, respectively. τ was zero for both analyses of the primary outcome (minimum estimate, maximum estimate). A Bayesian sensitivity analysis using external information on heterogeneity gave similar results.
We found evidence that antipsychotics cause short-term somatic serious adverse events on top of somatic serious adverse events occurring independent of treatment. This effect appears to be mainly driven by results in older patients. Hence, clinicians should be aware that antipsychotics are potentially toxic, particularly when treating patients sharing risk factors with the older population.
German Ministry of Education and Research.
抗精神病药物可能会引发急性严重副作用,进而导致严重精神健康障碍患者的身体发病率和死亡率上升。我们通过对国际协调会议-良好临床实践定义的抗精神病药物安慰剂对照试验中发生的严重不良事件进行荟萃分析,来检验这一假设。
对于这项系统评价和荟萃分析,我们纳入了比较第二代抗精神病药物与安慰剂的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane CENTRAL、BIOSIS、PsycINFO、PubMed、ClinicalTrials.gov和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台,以获取从数据库建立至2017年1月27日以任何语言发表的试验。纳入的试验在人群(诊断类别、年龄、性别、种族)、给药方案、盲法状态、持续时间或发表年份方面没有限制。仅排除持续时间少于1天的心理学研究和在中国内地进行的试验。我们联系了制药公司、药品监管当局和研究调查人员以获取额外数据。主要结局是至少发生一次躯体严重不良事件的患者数量。我们估计了每个研究组中具有该结局的患者的最小和最大数量,并在固定效应荟萃分析中用比值比(OR)综合结果。本研究已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD42016033930。
我们识别出597项符合纳入标准的RCT,共108664名参与者。314项试验(67642名参与者)提供了个体严重不良事件的详细信息,构成了荟萃分析的主要数据集。其中88%的试验持续时间为13周(约3个月)或更短(中位数为6周,四分位间距为4 - 9周)。服用抗精神病药物的42600名患者中,有698名(1.63%)至862名(2.02%)至少发生了一次躯体严重不良事件,服用安慰剂的25042名患者中有343名(1.37%)至419名(1.67%)发生了此类事件。基于最小和最大估计值,比值比分别为1.24(95%置信区间1.08 - 1.42)和1.24(1.10 - 1.41)。在预定义的亚组分析中,我们发现有证据表明,与成年人(18 - 65岁;1.09,0.91 - 1.29;1.10,0.95 - 1.28)相比,老年患者(>65岁;1.56,95%置信区间1.22 - 1.98;1.58,1.25 - 1.99)的影响更大;儿童或青少年(<18岁)的情况类似,尽管证据更不确切(1.49,0.81 - 2.75;1.54,0.85 - 2.77)。在纳入的597项RCT中,分别有30项(5%)、358项(60%)和209项(35%)被评为高、中、低偏倚风险。主要结局的两种分析(最小估计值、最大估计值)的τ均为零。使用关于异质性的外部信息进行的贝叶斯敏感性分析得出了类似结果。
我们发现有证据表明,抗精神病药物除了导致与治疗无关的躯体严重不良事件外,还会引发短期躯体严重不良事件。这种效应似乎主要由老年患者的结果驱动。因此,临床医生应意识到抗精神病药物具有潜在毒性,尤其是在治疗具有与老年人群相同风险因素的患者时。
德国教育和研究部。