• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BET1:是否进行汇报。

BET 1: To debrief or not debrief.

机构信息

Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2019 Jul;36(7):444-445. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208698.2.

DOI:10.1136/emermed-2019-208698.2
PMID:31320337
Abstract

A short cut review was carried out to establish whether a staff debriefing session after involvement in a traumatic resuscitation reduces stress and anxiety, reduces sickness, improves team working and morale and improves staff retention. Four papers presented the best evidence to answer the question. The author, date and country of publication, group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses of these papers are tabulated. It is concluded that there is no evidence about the efficacy of team debriefing in the ED. However, there is some desire among staff for it to occur. Further research is needed and in the meantime local advice should be followed.

摘要

一项简短的回顾性研究旨在确定在经历创伤性复苏后进行员工汇报是否能减轻压力和焦虑、减少疾病、改善团队合作和士气以及提高员工保留率。四篇论文提供了最佳证据来回答这个问题。作者、日期和出版国家、研究组、研究类型、相关结果、这些论文的结果和研究弱点都列在表中。研究结论认为,目前尚无证据表明 ED 中团队汇报会有效。然而,员工对此有一定的需求。需要进一步的研究,同时应遵循当地的建议。

相似文献

1
BET 1: To debrief or not debrief.BET1:是否进行汇报。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Jul;36(7):444-445. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208698.2.
2
Towards evidence based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. BET 1: does restrictive fluid resuscitation in penetrating chest injury affect outcome?迈向循证急诊医学:来自曼彻斯特皇家医院的最佳临床证据。最佳临床证据1:穿透性胸部损伤时采用限制性液体复苏会影响预后吗?
Emerg Med J. 2014 Oct;31(10):861-2. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204199.1.
3
BET 2: Pain management in patients who show awareness during CPR.BET 2:在心肺复苏期间表现出意识的患者的疼痛管理。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Apr;36(4):249-250. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208599.2.
4
Towards evidence-based emergency medicine: Best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. BET 3: Can metronomes improve CPR quality?迈向循证急诊医学:曼彻斯特皇家医院的最佳临床实践建议。最佳临床实践建议3:节拍器能否提高心肺复苏质量?
Emerg Med J. 2014 Mar;31(3):251-4. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-203617.3.
5
Debriefing after failed paediatric resuscitation: a survey of current UK practice.儿童复苏失败后的总结汇报:英国当前实践调查
Emerg Med J. 2008 Jun;25(6):328-30. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.048942.
6
BET 1: Continuous flow insufflation of oxygen in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.BET1:院外心脏骤停时持续气流供氧。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Jan;35(1):65-66. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207366.1.
7
Towards evidence based emergency medicine: Best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. BET 3: Advantages of ultrasound-assisted lumbar puncture.迈向循证急诊医学:曼彻斯特皇家医院的最佳临床证据。最佳临床证据3:超声引导下腰椎穿刺的优势
Emerg Med J. 2016 Feb;33(2):163-5. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205681.3.
8
BET 2: Usefulness of epinephrine in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.BET 2:肾上腺素在院外心脏骤停中的效用。
Emerg Med J. 2016 May;33(5):367-8. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205807.2.
9
Towards evidence based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. BET 1: the use of adrenaline and long-term survival in cardiopulmonary resuscitation following cardiac arrest.迈向循证急救医学:来自曼彻斯特皇家医院的最佳临床实践证据。BET1:心脏骤停后心肺复苏中使用肾上腺素与长期生存。
Emerg Med J. 2013 Mar;30(3):249-50. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202363.2.
10
Towards evidence based emergency medicine: Best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. BET 3: Vitamin C in severe burns.循证急救医学:来自曼彻斯特皇家医院的最佳临床实践证据。BET3:维生素 C 在严重烧伤中的应用。
Emerg Med J. 2012 Dec;29(12):1017-8. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-202054.4.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting hot debriefing in an emergency department.促进急诊科的热点讨论。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Aug;9(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000913.
2
Critical Event Debriefing in a Community Hospital.社区医院的关键事件汇报
Cureus. 2020 Jun 25;12(6):e8822. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8822.