Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Emerg Med J. 2018 Jan;35(1):65-66. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207366.1.
A short cut review was carried out to establish whether continuous flow insufflation of oxygen (CFIO) is better than standard ventilation strategies at improving outcome in adults who have suffered an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Papers were found in Medline and Embase using the reported searches of which four presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses of these best papers are tabulated. It is concluded that CFIO does not improve survival or return of spontaneous circulation compared with standard ventilation strategies in OHCA.
一篇简短的综述评估了在院外心脏骤停（OHCA）成人中，与标准通气策略相比，持续气流供氧（CFIO）是否能改善预后。在 Medline 和 Embase 中使用报告的检索词找到了相关文献，其中 4 篇最能回答临床问题的文献被纳入。这些最佳文献的作者、日期和出版国家、研究的患者群体、研究类型、相关结局、结果以及研究局限性均被制成表格。结论是，与标准通气策略相比，CFIO 并不能提高 OHCA 患者的生存率或自主循环恢复率。
