Suppr超能文献

术前神经阻滞置管时音乐与咪达唑仑的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。

Music versus midazolam during preoperative nerve block placements: a prospective randomized controlled study.

作者信息

Graff Veena, Cai Lu, Badiola Ignacio, Elkassabany Nabil M

机构信息

Anesthesiology & Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Anesthesiology & Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jul 18. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100251.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Music medicine is a non-pharmacologic intervention that is virtually harm-free, relatively inexpensive and has been shown to significantly decrease preoperative anxiety. In this study we aim to compare the use of music to midazolam as a preoperative anxiolytic prior to the administration of an ultrasound-guided single-injection peripheral nerve block.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled study we compared the anxiolytic effects of intravenous midazolam (1-2 mg) with noise-canceling headphone-delivered music medicine. All patients received a preoperative ultrasound-guided single-injection peripheral nerve block indicated for a primary regional anesthetic or postoperative analgesia.

RESULTS

The change in the State Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 (STAI-6) anxiety scores from after to before the procedure were similar in both groups (music group -1.6 (SD 10.7); midazolam group -4.2 (SD 11); p=0.14; mean difference between groups -2.5 (95% CI -5.9 to 0.9), p=0.1). Patient satisfaction scores with their procedure experience were higher in the midazolam group (p=0.01); however, there were no differences in physician satisfaction scores of their procedure experience between groups (p=0.07). Both patient and physician perceptions on difficulties in communication were higher in the music group than in the midazolam group (p=0.005 and p=0.0007, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Music medicine may be offered as an alternative to midazolam administration prior to peripheral regional anesthesia. However, further studies are warranted to evaluate whether or not the type of music, as well as how it is delivered, offers advantages over midazolam that outweigh the increase in communication barriers.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY

Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT03069677.

摘要

背景与目的

音乐疗法是一种几乎无伤害、成本相对较低的非药物干预措施,已证实其能显著减轻术前焦虑。本研究旨在比较在超声引导下单次注射外周神经阻滞前,使用音乐与咪达唑仑作为术前抗焦虑药物的效果。

方法

在这项随机对照研究中,我们比较了静脉注射咪达唑仑(1 - 2毫克)与通过降噪耳机播放音乐疗法的抗焦虑效果。所有患者均接受术前超声引导下单次注射外周神经阻滞,用于主要区域麻醉或术后镇痛。

结果

两组患者在手术前后状态 - 特质焦虑量表 - 6(STAI - 6)焦虑评分的变化相似(音乐组 -1.6(标准差10.7);咪达唑仑组 -4.2(标准差11);p = 0.14;组间平均差异 -2.5(95%置信区间 -5.9至0.9),p = 0.1)。咪达唑仑组患者对手术体验的满意度评分更高(p = 0.01);然而,两组医生对手术体验的满意度评分没有差异(p = 0.07)。音乐组患者和医生对沟通困难的感知均高于咪达唑仑组(分别为p = 0.005和p = 0.0007)。

结论

在进行外周区域麻醉前,音乐疗法可作为咪达唑仑给药的替代方法。然而,需要进一步研究以评估音乐的类型及其播放方式是否具有优于咪达唑仑的优势,且这种优势是否能超过沟通障碍的增加。

临床试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT03069677

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验