• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同时间常数下单麦克风降噪的主观评估。

Subjective evaluation of single microphone noise reduction with different time constants.

机构信息

Clinical & Experimental Audiology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC , Amsterdam , The Netherlands.

Audiology, Pento Audiological Centre , Amersfoort , The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2019 Nov;58(11):780-789. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1641231. Epub 2019 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1080/14992027.2019.1641231
PMID:31322023
Abstract

Previous studies on single microphone noise reduction (NR) in hearing aids (HAs) have shown that some NR algorithms provide beneficial effects in terms of listener preference. To improve HA user satisfaction, we are interested in characteristics that determine preferences for NR, and in the inter-individual variability. The aim of this study was to test if dynamic properties of NR influence listener preference. The gain reduction at speech offsets of a NR algorithm was slowed down by applying temporal exponential smoothing. At speech onsets the gain recovery was left unchanged. Test signals consisted of speech in continuous and modulated speech-shaped background noise, processed with three time constants: 0, 100, and 200 ms. 16 Normal hearing (NH) and 16 hearing impaired (HI) subjects participated in a paired-comparison listening test. NH subjects as a group had a significant preference for NR with time constants of 100, or 200 ms (slower acting NR). HI listeners as a group preferred NR over no NR, but had no clear preference for fast or slow NR. Patterns of preference differed between individual listeners. NR dynamics had an impact on individual listener preference and should be considered when optimising HAs.

摘要

先前有关助听器中单麦克风降噪(NR)的研究表明,一些 NR 算法在听众偏好方面具有有益的效果。为了提高助听器用户的满意度,我们对决定 NR 偏好的特性以及个体间的可变性很感兴趣。本研究旨在检验 NR 的动态特性是否会影响听众的偏好。通过应用时间指数平滑,将 NR 算法在语音结束时的增益减少速度减慢。在语音开始时,增益恢复保持不变。测试信号由连续语音和调制语音形状背景噪声组成,采用三个时间常数(0、100 和 200ms)进行处理。16 名正常听力(NH)和 16 名听力障碍(HI)受试者参加了配对比较听力测试。NH 受试者组对具有 100 或 200ms(作用较慢的 NR)时间常数的 NR 有显著偏好。HI 听众组更喜欢有 NR 而不是没有 NR,但对快或慢的 NR 没有明显偏好。个别听众的偏好模式存在差异。NR 动态特性对个体听众的偏好有影响,在优化助听器时应予以考虑。

相似文献

1
Subjective evaluation of single microphone noise reduction with different time constants.不同时间常数下单麦克风降噪的主观评估。
Int J Audiol. 2019 Nov;58(11):780-789. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1641231. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
2
Preferences for digital noise reduction and microphone mode settings in hearing-impaired listeners with low and high tolerances for background noise.对背景噪声容忍度低和高的听力受损者对数字降噪和麦克风模式设置的偏好。
Int J Audiol. 2020 Feb;59(2):90-100. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1671615. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
3
Comparison of single-microphone noise reduction schemes: can hearing impaired listeners tell the difference?单麦克风降噪方案的比较:听力受损的听众能分辨出差异吗?
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jun;57(sup3):S55-S61. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1279758. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
4
Individual Listener Preference for Strength of Single-Microphone Noise-Reduction; Trade-off Between Noise Tolerance and Signal Distortion Tolerance.个体对单麦克风降噪强度的偏好;噪声容忍度和信号失真容忍度之间的权衡。
Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231192304. doi: 10.1177/23312165231192304.
5
Directional Processing and Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids: Individual and Situational Influences on Preferred Setting.助听器中的定向处理与降噪:个体及情境因素对偏好设置的影响
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Sep;27(8):628-46. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15062.
6
Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?听力损失和认知功能是否会调节不同双耳降噪设置带来的益处?
Ear Hear. 2014 May-Jun;35(3):e52-62. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000003.
7
An objective measure for selecting microphone modes in OMNI/DIR hearing aid circuits.一种用于在全向性/方向性助听器电路中选择麦克风模式的客观测量方法。
Ear Hear. 2008 Apr;29(2):199-213. doi: 10.1097/aud.0b013e318164531f.
8
An Integrative Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Directional Microphone and Noise-Reduction Algorithm under Realistic Signal-to-Noise Ratios.在实际信噪比下定向麦克风和降噪算法功效的综合评估。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2020 Apr;31(4):262-270. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19009. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
9
Measuring the Influence of Noise Reduction on Listening Effort in Hearing-Impaired Listeners Using Response Times to an Arithmetic Task in Noise.使用噪声中算术任务的反应时间测量听力受损者在降噪环境下的聆听努力程度。
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211014437. doi: 10.1177/23312165211014437.
10
Perceptual consequences of different signal changes due to binaural noise reduction: do hearing loss and working memory capacity play a role?双耳降噪导致的不同信号变化的感知后果:听力损失和工作记忆容量起作用吗?
Ear Hear. 2014 Sep-Oct;35(5):e213-27. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000054.

引用本文的文献

1
Toward an Extended Classification of Noise-Distortion Preferences by Modeling Longitudinal Dynamics of Listening Choices.通过对听力选择的纵向动态进行建模实现噪声-失真偏好的扩展分类
Trends Hear. 2025 Jan-Dec;29:23312165251362018. doi: 10.1177/23312165251362018. Epub 2025 Aug 7.
2
Preferred Strength of Noise Reduction for Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.正常听力和听力障碍者的降噪偏好强度。
Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231211437. doi: 10.1177/23312165231211437.
3
Individual Listener Preference for Strength of Single-Microphone Noise-Reduction; Trade-off Between Noise Tolerance and Signal Distortion Tolerance.
个体对单麦克风降噪强度的偏好;噪声容忍度和信号失真容忍度之间的权衡。
Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231192304. doi: 10.1177/23312165231192304.
4
Measuring the Influence of Noise Reduction on Listening Effort in Hearing-Impaired Listeners Using Response Times to an Arithmetic Task in Noise.使用噪声中算术任务的反应时间测量听力受损者在降噪环境下的聆听努力程度。
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211014437. doi: 10.1177/23312165211014437.
5
Investigating the Effects of Four Auditory Profiles on Speech Recognition, Overall Quality, and Noise Annoyance With Simulated Hearing-Aid Processing Strategies.探究四种听觉轮廓对言语识别、整体质量和噪声烦恼的影响,以及模拟助听器处理策略。
Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec;24:2331216520960861. doi: 10.1177/2331216520960861.