Suppr超能文献

肺癌切除术的长时间漏气评分:胸外科医师学会普通胸外科数据库分析。

A Prolonged Air Leak Score for Lung Cancer Resection: An Analysis of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Nov;108(5):1478-1483. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.05.069. Epub 2019 Jul 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to create a simple preoperative tool to assess the risk of prolonged air leak (PAL) using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database (STS GTSD).

METHODS

The STS GTSD was queried for patients who underwent elective lung cancer resection between 2009 and 2016. Exclusion criteria included pneumonectomy, sleeve lobectomy, chest wall resection, bilateral procedures, and patients with incomplete data sets. The primary outcome was PAL exceeding 5 days. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for a PAL. Model coefficients were used to generate a PAL score (PALS). The approach was cross-validated in 100 replications of a training set consisting of two-thirds of the cohort that was randomly selected and a validation set of remaining patients.

RESULTS

A total of 52,198 patients from the STS GTSD met inclusion criteria, with an overall rate of PAL of 10.4% (n = 5453). Final variables incorporated into the PALS included body mass index of 25 kg/m or less (7 points), lobectomy or bilobectomy (6 points), forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 70% predicted or less (5 points), male sex (4 points), and right upper lobe procedure (3 points). A cumulative PALS exceeding 17 points stratified patients as high-risk or low-risk for PAL (19.6% vs 9% rate of PAL) with a cross-validated mean negative predictive value of 91%, positive predictive value of 19%, sensitivity of 30%, specificity of 85%, and correctly classifies 79% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The PALS is a simple preoperative clinical tool that can reliably risk-stratify patients for PAL who are undergoing lung cancer resection.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在使用胸外科医师学会普通胸外科数据库(STS GTSD)创建一种简单的术前工具,以评估延长漏气(PAL)的风险。

方法

从 STS GTSD 中查询 2009 年至 2016 年间接受择期肺癌切除术的患者。排除标准包括全肺切除术、袖状肺叶切除术、胸壁切除术、双侧手术以及数据不完整的患者。主要结局是 PAL 超过 5 天。多变量逻辑回归用于确定 PAL 的危险因素。模型系数用于生成 PAL 评分(PALS)。该方法在从队列中随机选择的三分之二的训练集和剩余患者的验证集中进行了 100 次交叉验证。

结果

STS GTSD 共纳入 52198 例患者,PAL 总发生率为 10.4%(n=5453)。纳入 PALS 的最终变量包括体重指数为 25kg/m2 或以下(7 分)、肺叶切除术或双肺叶切除术(6 分)、第 1 秒用力呼气量预测值的 70%或以下(5 分)、男性(4 分)和右上叶手术(3 分)。累积 PALS 超过 17 分将患者分为 PAL 高危或低危(PAL 发生率分别为 19.6%和 9%),交叉验证平均阴性预测值为 91%,阳性预测值为 19%,敏感性为 30%,特异性为 85%,正确分类 79%的患者。

结论

PALS 是一种简单的术前临床工具,可可靠地对接受肺癌切除术的患者进行 PAL 风险分层。

相似文献

1
A Prolonged Air Leak Score for Lung Cancer Resection: An Analysis of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Nov;108(5):1478-1483. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.05.069. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
5
Predicting Non-home Discharge After Lung Surgery: Analysis of the General Thoracic Surgery Database.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Mar;115(3):687-692. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.07.020. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
6
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Lung Cancer Resection Risk Model: Higher Quality Data and Superior Outcomes.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Aug;102(2):370-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.02.098. Epub 2016 May 19.
7
Penetration, Completeness, and Representativeness of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database for Lobectomy.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Mar;107(3):897-902. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.07.059. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
9

引用本文的文献

1
Implantation of polyglycolic acid mesh over lung resection staple lines to prevent air leaks.
JTCVS Tech. 2025 Jun 11;32:163-171. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2025.05.022. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Clinical impact of surgical approaches on early-phase postoperative air leakage.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 21;15(1):26475. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12038-y.
4
and DL predicting general complications but not prolonged air leaks in pulmonary segmentectomy.
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2025 Jan-Dec;19:17534666251341777. doi: 10.1177/17534666251341777. Epub 2025 Jul 7.
6
Pneumothorax After VATS for Pleural Empyema in Pediatric Patients.
Children (Basel). 2025 Jan 28;12(2):154. doi: 10.3390/children12020154.
7
Chest tube provocative clamping in patients having moderate or intense air leaks after lung resection to accelerate recovery.
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Dec 31;16(12):8648-8655. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1871. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
9
Incidence of air leaks in patients undergoing robotic thoracic surgery and video-assisted thoracic surgery.
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2024 Aug;86(3):464-471. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.86.3.464.
10
Routine conventional leak test is not required for robotic major pulmonary resections.
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Apr;73(4):245-253. doi: 10.1007/s11748-024-02081-3. Epub 2024 Sep 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges in Predicting Recurrence After Resection of Node-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Nov;106(5):1460-1467. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.06.022. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
2
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database 2018 Update on Outcomes and Quality.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 May;105(5):1304-1307. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.02.006. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
3
Surgically Managed Clinical Stage IIIA-Clinical N2 Lung Cancer in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Aug;104(2):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.02.031. Epub 2017 May 17.
5
A clinical prediction model for prolonged air leak after pulmonary resection.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Mar;153(3):690-699.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
6
Suction or Nonsuction: How to Manage a Chest Tube After Pulmonary Resection.
Thorac Surg Clin. 2017 Feb;27(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2016.08.006.
7
Identifying Patients at Higher Risk of Prolonged Air Leak After Lung Resection.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Nov;102(5):1674-1679. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.035. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
9
Research based on big data: The good, the bad, and the ugly.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Mar;151(3):629-630. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.11.016. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
10
The anticipation and management of air leaks and residual spaces post lung resection.
J Thorac Dis. 2014 Mar;6(3):271-84. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.11.29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验