Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wexner Medical Center at the Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wexner Medical Center at the Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Jan;17(1):75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
Implantable loop recorder (ILR) is preferred strategy for prolonged rhythm monitoring.
The purpose of this study was to report the incidence and causes of false-positive (FP) diagnoses during remote monitoring with ILR.
During a 4-week study period, all consecutive remote transmissions in patients with ILR (Reveal LINQ, Medtronic) implanted for atrial fibrillation (AF) surveillance, cryptogenic stroke (CS), and syncope were reviewed. A nurse specializing in device management and an electrophysiologist adjudicated all transmissions. Primary endpoint of the study was incidence of FP in patients with AF, CS, and syncope.
A total of 695 remote transmissions (scheduled downloads: 414; Alerts: 281) sent from 559 patients were adjudicated. The majority of patients had ILR for AF surveillance (n = 321), followed by CS (n =168) and syncope (n = 70) with nominal programming for rhythm diagnosis. Incidence of FP transmissions during the study period was 46%, 86%, and 71% in patients with AF, CS, and syncope, respectively. Incidence of FP transmissions was higher in patients with CS and syncope than in patients with AF (P <.001). For scheduled transmissions, primary causes of FP were signal dropout and undersensing; for alert transmissions, primary reasons for FP were premature atrial and ventricular ectopy.
Incidence of FP during remote monitoring with nominal settings on this ILR was substantial, ranging from 46% to 86% depending on the indication for implantation. Adjudication of these transmissions required a considerable time commitment from electrophysiologists and device clinic personnel but would be required to avoid misdiagnosis and potential errors in clinical management.
植入式循环记录器(ILR)是进行长时间节律监测的首选策略。
本研究旨在报告 ILR 远程监测中假阳性(FP)诊断的发生率和原因。
在为期 4 周的研究期间,对植入 ILR(Reveal LINQ,美敦力)用于房颤(AF)监测、隐源性卒中(CS)和晕厥的患者的所有连续远程传输进行了回顾。专门的设备管理护士和电生理学家对所有传输进行了裁决。研究的主要终点是 AF、CS 和晕厥患者的 FP 发生率。
共对 559 名患者发送的 695 次远程传输(预定下载:414 次;警报:281 次)进行了裁决。大多数患者的 ILR 用于 AF 监测(n = 321),其次是 CS(n = 168)和晕厥(n = 70),其节律诊断的编程为名义编程。在研究期间,AF、CS 和晕厥患者的 FP 传输发生率分别为 46%、86%和 71%。CS 和晕厥患者的 FP 传输发生率高于 AF 患者(P <.001)。对于预定传输,FP 的主要原因为信号丢失和感知不足;对于警报传输,FP 的主要原因是过早的房性和室性早搏。
在这个 ILR 上进行的名义设置远程监测中,FP 的发生率相当高,根据植入的适应症,其发生率从 46%到 86%不等。这些传输的裁决需要电生理学家和设备诊所人员投入大量时间,但这是避免误诊和潜在临床管理错误所必需的。