• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人工智能算法的可植入式心脏监测器的诊断性能得到提高。

Improved diagnostic performance of insertable cardiac monitors by an artificial intelligence-based algorithm.

机构信息

Implicity SAS, Paris, France.

Jacques Cartier Private Hospital, Massy, France.

出版信息

Europace. 2023 Dec 28;26(1). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad375.

DOI:10.1093/europace/euad375
PMID:38170474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10787483/
Abstract

AIMS

The increasing use of insertable cardiac monitors (ICM) produces a high rate of false positive (FP) diagnoses. Their verification results in a high workload for caregivers. We evaluated the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based ILR-ECG Analyzer™ (ILR-ECG-A). This machine-learning algorithm reclassifies ICM-transmitted events to minimize the rate of FP diagnoses, while preserving device sensitivity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We selected 546 recipients of ICM followed by the Implicity™ monitoring platform. To avoid clusterization, a single episode per ICM abnormal diagnosis (e.g. asystole, bradycardia, atrial tachycardia (AT)/atrial fibrillation (AF), ventricular tachycardia, artefact) was selected per patient, and analyzed by the ILR-ECG-A, applying the same diagnoses as the ICM. All episodes were reviewed by an adjudication committee (AC) and the results were compared. Among 879 episodes classified as abnormal by the ICM, 80 (9.1%) were adjudicated as 'Artefacts', 283 (32.2%) as FP, and 516 (58.7%) as 'abnormal' by the AC. The algorithm reclassified 215 of the 283 FP as normal (76.0%), and confirmed 509 of the 516 episodes as abnormal (98.6%). Seven undiagnosed false negatives were adjudicated as AT or non-specific abnormality. The overall diagnostic specificity was 76.0% and the sensitivity was 98.6%.

CONCLUSION

The new AI-based ILR-ECG-A lowered the rate of FP ICM diagnoses significantly while retaining a > 98% sensitivity. This will likely alleviate considerably the clinical burden represented by the review of ICM events.

摘要

目的

越来越多的可植入心脏监测器(ICM)的使用导致了大量的假阳性(FP)诊断。这些诊断的验证会给护理人员带来很大的工作负担。我们评估了基于人工智能(AI)的 ILR-ECG Analyzer™(ILR-ECG-A)的性能。该机器学习算法重新分类 ICM 传输的事件,以尽量减少 FP 诊断的发生率,同时保持设备的灵敏度。

方法和结果

我们选择了 546 名接受 ICM 监测的患者,随后使用了 ImplicityTM 监测平台。为了避免聚类,每个患者的 ICM 异常诊断(如停搏、心动过缓、房性心动过速(AT)/心房颤动(AF)、室性心动过速、伪差)仅选择一个事件,由 ILR-ECG-A 进行分析,并应用与 ICM 相同的诊断。所有的事件都由一个裁决委员会(AC)进行审查,并比较结果。在 ICM 分类为异常的 879 个事件中,80 个(9.1%)被裁决为“伪差”,283 个(32.2%)为 FP,516 个(58.7%)为 AC 判定的“异常”。该算法将 283 个 FP 中的 215 个重新分类为正常(76.0%),并确认了 516 个事件中的 509 个为异常(98.6%)。7 个未诊断的假阴性被裁决为 AT 或非特异性异常。总的诊断特异性为 76.0%,敏感性为 98.6%。

结论

新的基于 AI 的 ILR-ECG-A 显著降低了 ICM 诊断的 FP 率,同时保持了>98%的灵敏度。这将大大减轻对 ICM 事件审查的临床负担。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce68/10787483/f92bf6b10921/euad375f5a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce68/10787483/daf896ffac94/euad375f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce68/10787483/b916438551e5/euad375f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce68/10787483/b9d407b33018/euad375f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce68/10787483/18c34c041c3c/euad375f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce68/10787483/f92bf6b10921/euad375f5a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce68/10787483/daf896ffac94/euad375f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce68/10787483/b916438551e5/euad375f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce68/10787483/b9d407b33018/euad375f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce68/10787483/18c34c041c3c/euad375f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce68/10787483/f92bf6b10921/euad375f5a.jpg

相似文献

1
Improved diagnostic performance of insertable cardiac monitors by an artificial intelligence-based algorithm.基于人工智能算法的可植入式心脏监测器的诊断性能得到提高。
Europace. 2023 Dec 28;26(1). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad375.
2
Artificial intelligence cloud platform improves arrhythmia detection from insertable cardiac monitors to 25 cardiac rhythm patterns through multi-label classification.人工智能云平台通过多标签分类将可植入式心脏监测器的心律失常检测提高到 25 种心脏节律模式。
J Electrocardiol. 2023 Nov-Dec;81:4-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2023.07.001. Epub 2023 Jul 9.
3
Real-world performance of an enhanced atrial fibrillation detection algorithm in an insertable cardiac monitor.一种增强型心房颤动检测算法在可植入式心脏监测器中的真实性能。
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Aug;13(8):1624-30. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 May 7.
4
Comparison of the Effect of Atrial Fibrillation Detection Algorithms in Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke Using Implantable Loop Recorders.使用植入式环路记录器比较隐匿性卒中患者的房颤检测算法的效果。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Aug 15;129:25-29. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.05.027. Epub 2020 May 23.
5
Novel algorithms improve arrhythmia detection accuracy in insertable cardiac monitors.新型算法提高可植入式心脏监测器的心律失常检测准确性。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Sep;34(9):1961-1968. doi: 10.1111/jce.16007. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
6
Artificial intelligence augments detection accuracy of cardiac insertable cardiac monitors: Results from a pilot prospective observational study.人工智能提高心脏可植入式监测器的检测准确性:一项前瞻性试点观察研究的结果。
Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2022 Aug 4;3(5):201-211. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2022.07.071. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
Performance of a new atrial fibrillation detection algorithm in a miniaturized insertable cardiac monitor: Results from the Reveal LINQ Usability Study.一种新型房颤检测算法在小型化可插入式心脏监测仪中的性能:Reveal LINQ可用性研究结果
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jul;13(7):1425-30. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
8
Are implantable cardiac monitors reliable tools for cardiac arrhythmias detection? An intra-patient comparison with permanent pacemakers.植入式心脏监测器是检测心律失常的可靠工具吗?一项与永久起搏器的患者内比较。
J Electrocardiol. 2020 Mar-Apr;59:147-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.02.014. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
9
Adapting detection sensitivity based on evidence of irregular sinus arrhythmia to improve atrial fibrillation detection in insertable cardiac monitors.基于不规则窦性心律失常证据调整检测灵敏度,以提高植入式心脏监测器中的房颤检测效果。
Europace. 2018 Nov 1;20(FI_3):f321-f328. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux272.
10
Daily and automatic remote monitoring of implantable cardiac monitors: A descriptive analysis of transmitted episodes.每日和自动远程监测植入式心脏监测器:传输事件的描述性分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Oct 15;389:131199. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131199. Epub 2023 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
EHRA perspective on the digital data revolution in arrhythmia management: insights from the association's annual summit.欧洲心律协会对心律失常管理中数字数据革命的观点:来自该协会年度峰会的见解
Europace. 2025 Aug 4;27(8). doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf149.
2
The present and future of cardiological telemonitoring in Europe: a statement from seven European countries.欧洲心脏远程监测的现状与未来:七个欧洲国家的声明
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2025 Apr 8. doi: 10.1007/s00399-025-01076-8.
3
Impact of Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Insertable Cardiac Monitors on Device Clinic Workflow and Resource Utilization.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinician's guide to trustworthy and responsible artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging.心血管成像中值得信赖和负责任的人工智能临床医生指南。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 8;9:1016032. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1016032. eCollection 2022.
2
What is new with Artificial Intelligence? Human-agent interactions through the lens of social agency.人工智能有哪些新进展?从社会能动性视角看人与智能体的交互。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:954444. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954444. eCollection 2022.
3
Artificial intelligence for early atrial fibrillation detection.
人工智能增强型可插入式心脏监测仪对设备诊所工作流程和资源利用的影响。
JACC Adv. 2025 Apr;4(4):101656. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101656. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
用于早期房颤检测的人工智能
Lancet. 2022 Oct 8;400(10359):1173-1175. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01802-5.
4
Artificial intelligence-guided screening for atrial fibrillation using electrocardiogram during sinus rhythm: a prospective non-randomised interventional trial.人工智能引导窦性心律心电图心房颤动筛查:一项前瞻性非随机干预性试验。
Lancet. 2022 Oct 8;400(10359):1206-1212. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01637-3. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
5
Analysis of digitalized ECG signals based on artificial intelligence and spectral analysis methods specialized in ARVC.基于人工智能和专门针对 ARVC 的频谱分析方法的数字化 ECG 信号分析。
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2022 Nov;38(11):e3644. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3644. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
6
Qualitative Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support System to Guide Rhythm Management of Atrial Fibrillation: Survey Study.基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统指导心房颤动节律管理的定性评估:调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 11;6(8):e36443. doi: 10.2196/36443.
7
Wearables, telemedicine, and artificial intelligence in arrhythmias and heart failure: Proceedings of the European Society of Cardiology Cardiovascular Round Table.可穿戴设备、远程医疗和心律失常与心力衰竭中的人工智能:欧洲心脏病学会心血管圆桌会议论文集。
Europace. 2022 Oct 13;24(9):1372-1383. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac052.
8
Machine Learning Using a Single-Lead ECG to Identify Patients With Atrial Fibrillation-Induced Heart Failure.使用单导联心电图的机器学习来识别房颤诱发心力衰竭患者。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 28;9:812719. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.812719. eCollection 2022.
9
Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing the Impact of Implantable Loop Recorder Versus Usual Care After Ischemic Stroke for Detection of Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Risk.Meta 分析缺血性卒中后植入式循环记录仪与常规护理比较对心房颤动和卒中风险检测的影响的随机临床试验。
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Jan 1;162:100-104. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.09.013. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
10
Resource Use and Economic Implications of Remote Monitoring With Subcutaneous Cardiac Rhythm Monitors.远程监测皮下心脏节律监测器的资源利用和经济影响。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Jun;7(6):745-754. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.10.014. Epub 2021 Jan 27.