Neurochirurgie, Générale de Santé - Hôpital Privé Clairval, Serarl Neuro Val Redon, 317, boulevard du Redon, Marseille 13009, France.
Chirurgie Orthopedique et Traumatologie, Hôpital Privé Jean-Mermoz, Ramsay Générale de Santé, 24, avenue Paul-Santy, Lyon 69008, France.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Oct;105(6):1157-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.04.023. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
This is a Phase IV, national, multicentre, retrospective study to observe the real-world use of rhBMP-2 in France.
There was no statistical hypothesis, the statistical analyses were descriptive in nature.
Data was collected from patient medical files in 10 French spinal centres. Primary objectives were to understand which patients were treated with rhBMP-2, commercialised in Europe as InductOs™ and how rhBMP-2 was used during spinal fusion surgery in France between 2011 and 2012.
Four hundred patients (634 levels) treated with rhBMP-2 were included in the analysis. The most frequent primary diagnostic indication for rhBMP-2 use was degenerative disc disease (DDD; 129/400; 32.3% of patients) followed by spondylolisthesis (119/400; 29.8%), deformity (59/400; 14.8%) and pseudoarthrosis (29/400; 7.3%). The most frequently treated level was L4-L5 (33.8% of levels in 53.5% of patients); followed by L5-S1 (29.8%, 47.3%), L3-L4 (16.7%, 26.5%), and L2-L3 (7.3%, 11.5%), all other levels (less than 5% of patients). No interbody fusion device was used in 42.7% of levels. Wetted matrix of rhBMP-2 was placed in the interbody space in 58.4% of levels (370/634). The most common procedure for rhBMP-2 treatment was posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) (221/634; 34.9% of levels), followed by anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) (188/634; 29.7%), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) (111/634; 17.5%), lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) (106/634; 16.7%), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) (4/634; 0.6%) and 'other' (4/634; 0.6%). Thirty-one adverse events of Interest (AEI) were recorded in 27 patients. One AEI was considered related to rhBMP-2. Unplanned secondary spine interventions at index level treated with rhBMP-2 were required in 4 patients.
In years 2011 and 2012 when the surgeries captured in this retrospective study were done, rhBMP-2 was indicated for single level (L4-S1) anterior lumbar spine fusion as a substitute for autogenous bone graft in adults with DDD. The most common procedure for the treatment with rhBMP-2 was PLF (off-label use), followed by ALIF (on-label use). The safety findings confirm a predictable and manageable safety profile.
IV.
这是一项在法国进行的、全国性的、多中心的回顾性研究,旨在观察 rhBMP-2 在真实世界中的应用。
没有统计假设,统计分析本质上是描述性的。
数据从法国 10 个脊柱中心的患者病历中收集。主要目的是了解哪些患者使用了在欧洲商业化的 rhBMP-2(InductOs™),以及在 2011 年至 2012 年期间,rhBMP-2 在法国脊柱融合手术中是如何使用的。
共纳入 400 例(634 个节段)接受 rhBMP-2 治疗的患者进行分析。使用 rhBMP-2 的最常见的主要诊断指征是退行性椎间盘疾病(DDD;129/400;32.3%的患者),其次是脊椎滑脱(119/400;29.8%)、畸形(59/400;14.8%)和假关节(29/400;7.3%)。最常治疗的节段是 L4-L5(53.5%的患者中有 33.8%的节段);其次是 L5-S1(29.8%,47.3%)、L3-L4(16.7%,26.5%)和 L2-L3(7.3%,11.5%),所有其他节段(少于 5%的患者)。42.7%的节段未使用椎间融合器。58.4%的节段(370/634)中湿化的 rhBMP-2 基质被放置在椎间间隙。rhBMP-2 治疗最常见的手术是后路腰椎融合术(PLF)(221/634;34.9%的节段),其次是前路腰椎间融合术(ALIF)(188/634;29.7%)、后路腰椎间融合术(PLIF)(111/634;17.5%)、侧路腰椎间融合术(LLIF)(106/634;16.7%)、经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(TLIF)(4/634;0.6%)和“其他”(4/634;0.6%)。在 27 名患者中记录了 31 个感兴趣的不良事件(AEI)。有 1 个 AEI 被认为与 rhBMP-2 有关。在接受 rhBMP-2 治疗的索引水平需要进行计划外的二次脊柱干预的患者有 4 名。
在进行这项回顾性研究的 2011 年和 2012 年,rhBMP-2 被指示用于单节段(L4-S1)前路腰椎融合术,作为成人 DDD 自体骨移植物的替代品。rhBMP-2 治疗最常见的手术是 PLF(标签外使用),其次是 ALIF(标签内使用)。安全性发现证实了一种可预测和可控的安全性。
IV。