Crilly Julia, Robinson Jemma, Sharman Vicki, Cross Jack, Romero Bernadine, Teasdale Trudy, Keijzers Gerben
Department of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast Health, 1 Hospital Blvd, Southport 4215, QLD, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Parkwood 4222, QLD, Australia.
Pharmacy Department, Gold Coast Health, 1 Hospital Blvd, Southport 4215, QLD, Australia.
Int Emerg Nurs. 2019 Sep;46:100782. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
To describe clinical recognition, response and outcomes of patients with sepsis.
A retrospective, observational study was undertaken at two hospitals. Inclusion criteria were: adult patients admitted via the Emergency Department (ED) between 1 January and 30 April 2014 allocated a primary ICD-10-AM discharge from hospital code related to sepsis. Recognition of sepsis was considered based on the presence of clinical documentation that reflects the Sepsis Kills criteria being met. Response to sepsis was considered based on the presence of clinical documentation where the patient received a response consistent with the 'Sepsis Six' strategies. Outcomes pertained to response to sepsis (e.g. time to antibiotics) and ED measures (e.g. time to be seen, ED length of stay). Sub-group analysis considered location where sepsis was recognised (ED/ward).
In total, 96 patients met the inclusion criteria; most were admitted under general medicine (37%) followed by intensive care (18%). Sepsis was recognised in the ED for most patients (n = 64), with a history of fevers/rigors the most common (60%) indication of infection. Regarding response and ED outcomes for this group, the median time from triage nurse assessment i) to being seen by the treating clinician was 19 min; ii) to sepsis recognition was 27 min; and iii) to antibiotics was 181 min; 35% received antibiotics within 60 min from recognition. Those recognised in the ED had a longer ED stay than those where sepsis was recognised on the ward (336 min vs. 225 min, p = 0.013).
Sepsis can develop at various stages throughout the patient's journey. In this small sample, ED recognition was associated with longer ED stay, likely due to more interventions. Whilst guidelines recommend antibiotics be administered within 60 min of triage, this was not achieved for most patients. Given the dynamic nature of sepsis, future indicators may focus on time from recognition rather than time from triage.
描述脓毒症患者的临床识别、反应及转归。
在两家医院开展了一项回顾性观察研究。纳入标准为:2014年1月1日至4月30日期间经急诊科收治、出院时主要国际疾病分类第十次修订本澳大利亚和新西兰版(ICD - 10 - AM)编码与脓毒症相关的成年患者。脓毒症的识别基于反映符合“脓毒症致死”标准的临床记录。脓毒症的反应基于患者接受了符合“脓毒症六步法”策略的反应的临床记录。转归涉及对脓毒症的反应(如给予抗生素的时间)及急诊科措施(如就诊时间、急诊科住院时间)。亚组分析考虑脓毒症被识别的地点(急诊科/病房)。
共有96例患者符合纳入标准;大多数患者在内科(37%)之后入住重症监护病房(18%)。大多数患者(n = 64)在急诊科被识别出脓毒症,发热/寒战病史是最常见的(60%)感染指征。关于该组患者的反应及急诊科转归,从分诊护士评估到:i)接受治疗的临床医生诊治的中位时间为19分钟;ii)识别出脓毒症的时间为27分钟;iii)给予抗生素的时间为181分钟;35%的患者在识别出脓毒症后60分钟内接受了抗生素治疗。在急诊科被识别出脓毒症的患者比在病房被识别出脓毒症的患者在急诊科的住院时间更长(336分钟对225分钟,p = 0.013)。
脓毒症可在患者就医过程的不同阶段发生。在这个小样本中,在急诊科识别出脓毒症与更长的急诊科住院时间相关,可能是由于更多的干预措施。虽然指南建议在分诊后60分钟内给予抗生素,但大多数患者并未做到。鉴于脓毒症的动态特性,未来的指标可能侧重于从识别出脓毒症起的时间而非从分诊起的时间。