Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China.
Environ Pollut. 2019 Oct;253:449-463. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.118. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
Sustainable remediation is a goal in the remediation industry. Thermal treatment can remediate contaminated sites quickly and reliably, but its energy-intensive nature and potential to damage soil properties make it seemingly not sustainable. This review evaluates the potential for thermal treatment to become a sustainable remediation technology based on a comprehensive analysis of the scientific literature. The fundamentals, advantages, and limitations of single thermal treatment technologies are summarized. The compatibility and advantages of thermal treatment coupled with thermal, physicochemical, or biological technologies are reviewed. The results suggest that ingeniously designed coupled technologies can improve the availability and removal efficiency of contaminant, suppress the production of toxic byproduct, and reduce the required heating temperature and energy input. The sustainability of thermal treatment is then discussed from the perspectives of energy efficiency and land reuse. Approaches for improving energy efficiency include applying solar energy-based technologies, smoldering-based technologies, and coupled technologies. For land reuse, heating below 250 °C has negligible adverse impacts on most soil properties, and can increase nutrient availability and release dissolved organic carbon to support the growth of microorganisms and plants. Heating above 250 °C can significantly reduce soil organic matter and clay content, which decreases the soil cation exchange capacity and water holding capacity, and consequently damages the soil fertility. Some restoration strategies are also proposed for the recovery of soil quality. In addition, thermally remediated soil is considered to be a good candidate as an engineering medium for construction. This review concludes with an outlook of future research efforts that will further shift thermal treatment toward sustainable remediation.
可持续修复是修复行业的目标。热修复技术可以快速、可靠地修复污染场地,但它的能源密集型性质和破坏土壤特性的潜力使其似乎不可持续。本综述基于对科学文献的综合分析,评估了热修复技术成为可持续修复技术的潜力。总结了单一热修复技术的基本原理、优点和局限性。综述了热修复与热、物理化学或生物技术相结合的兼容性和优点。结果表明,巧妙设计的耦合技术可以提高污染物的可用性和去除效率,抑制有毒副产物的产生,并降低所需的加热温度和能源输入。然后从能源效率和土地再利用的角度讨论了热修复的可持续性。提高能源效率的方法包括应用基于太阳能的技术、闷烧技术和耦合技术。对于土地再利用,加热温度低于 250°C 对大多数土壤性质几乎没有不利影响,反而可以增加养分的有效性并释放溶解有机碳,以支持微生物和植物的生长。加热温度高于 250°C 会显著降低土壤有机质和粘粒含量,从而降低土壤阳离子交换能力和持水能力,进而破坏土壤肥力。还提出了一些恢复策略来恢复土壤质量。此外,热修复土壤被认为是建筑工程介质的良好候选材料。最后展望了未来的研究工作,将进一步推动热修复向可持续修复方向发展。