Division de Neurotologia, Hospital Del Carmen, Mendoza, Argentina.
Illinois Neurologic Institute, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, IL, United States.
Prog Brain Res. 2019;249:345-360. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.04.022. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
The diagnosis of central positional vertigo (CPV) is challenging, mainly because symptoms overlap with the common variants of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). Recent correlations of imaging with neurotologic exams have improved our understanding of CPV and ability differentiate it from BPPV. Yet, there is still a need to develop better diagnostic algorithms to improve timely diagnosis and early intervention. Here we present a retrospective review of the clinical characteristics, neurotologic evaluation and imaging of CPV in a cohort of 27 patients and propose a diagnostic algorithm to be tested in future prospective fashion. Most patients had positional nystagmus (downbeat and apogeotropic horizontal), cerebellar ocular motor abnormalities and truncal ataxia indicative of a central lesion. 61.5% of our cohort had paroxysmal CPV, 30.5% had a non-paroxysmal CPV and 8% paroxysmal-evolving-to-non-paroxysmal CPV. The most common pattern of positional nystagmus evoked with maneuvers was positional downbeat nystagmus (pDBN, 69.2%), apogeotropic horizontal nystagmus (42.3%), geotropic (7.69%) and multiplanar (23.0%). Notably, 13 (50%) of patients had cerebral imaging prior to CPV being on the differential diagnosis, whereas another 50% of patients had CPV diagnosis preceding their work-up. Unilateral lesions on imaging were 4× less likely to exhibit nausea and vomiting, nearly 2× less likely to exhibit paroxysmal nystagmus, and 2× less likely to exhibit nystagmus with habituality. Findings of pDBN or apogeotropic nystagmus alone were enough to diagnose CPV in 50% of our patient cohort, underscoring the importance of clinical evaluation in a time when an "imaging-first" philosophy is gaining popularity in Neurology.
中央位置性眩晕(CPV)的诊断具有挑战性,主要是因为其症状与常见的良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)变体重叠。最近影像学与神经耳科学检查的相关性提高了我们对 CPV 的认识,并增强了我们将其与 BPPV 区分开来的能力。然而,仍然需要开发更好的诊断算法,以提高及时诊断和早期干预的能力。在这里,我们回顾性分析了 27 例 CPV 患者的临床特征、神经耳科学评估和影像学表现,并提出了一种诊断算法,以供未来前瞻性研究。大多数患者存在位置性眼球震颤(下跳性和向地性水平性)、小脑眼动异常和躯干性共济失调,提示为中枢性病变。我们队列中有 61.5%的患者为阵发性 CPV,30.5%的患者为非阵发性 CPV,8%的患者为阵发性向非阵发性 CPV 演变。通过手法诱发的位置性眼球震颤中最常见的模式是位置性下跳性眼球震颤(pDBN,69.2%)、向地性水平性眼球震颤(42.3%)、向地性(7.69%)和多平面性(23.0%)。值得注意的是,13 名(50%)患者在 CPV 被列入鉴别诊断之前已经进行了脑部影像学检查,而另外 50%的患者在进行检查之前已经被诊断为 CPV。影像学单侧病变不太可能出现恶心和呕吐,不太可能出现阵发性眼球震颤的可能性低近 2 倍,且不太可能出现习惯性眼球震颤的可能性低 2 倍。pDBN 或向地性眼球震颤单独存在就足以诊断我们患者队列中的 50%的 CPV,这凸显了在神经科中“影像学优先”理念日益流行的时代,临床评估的重要性。