Bery Anand K, Chang Tzu-Pu
Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Department of Neurology/Neuro-Medical Scientific Center, Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taichung, Taiwan.
Front Neurol. 2022 Sep 26;13:941909. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.941909. eCollection 2022.
Diagnosis of acute vestibular syndrome (AVS) with hearing loss is challenging because the leading vascular cause-AICA territory stroke-can appear benign on head impulse testing. We evaluated the diagnostic utility of various bedside oculomotor tests to discriminate imaging-positive and imaging-negative cases of AVS plus hearing loss.
We reviewed 13 consecutive inpatients with AVS and acute unilateral hearing loss. We compared neurologic findings, bedside and video head impulse testing (bHIT, vHIT), and other vestibular signs (including nystagmus, skew deviation, and positional testing) between MRI+ and MRI- cases.
Five of thirteen patients had a lateral pontine lesion (i.e., MRI+); eight did not (i.e., MRI-). Horizontal-canal head impulse test showed ipsilateral vestibular loss in all five MRI+ patients but only in three MRI- patients. The ipsilesional VOR gains of horizontal-canal vHIT were significantly lower in the MRI+ than the MRI- group (0.56 ± 0.11 vs. 0.87 ± 0.24, = 0.03). All 5 MRI+ patients had horizontal spontaneous nystagmus beating away from the lesion (5/5). One patient (1/5) had direction-changing nystagmus with gaze. Two had skew deviation (2/5). Among the 8 MRI- patients, one (1/8) presented as unilateral vestibulopathy, four (4/8) had positional nystagmus and three (3/8) had isolated posterior canal hypofunction.
The horizontal-canal head impulse test poorly discriminates central and peripheral lesions when hearing loss accompanies AVS. Paradoxically, a lateral pontine lesion usually mimics unilateral peripheral vestibulopathy. By contrast, patients with peripheral lesions usually present with positional nystagmus or isolated posterior canal impairment, risking misdiagnosis as central vestibulopathy.
急性前庭综合征(AVS)伴听力损失的诊断具有挑战性,因为主要的血管病因——小脑前下动脉(AICA)供血区卒中——在头部脉冲试验中可能表现为良性。我们评估了各种床旁动眼神经检查在鉴别AVS伴听力损失的影像学阳性和影像学阴性病例中的诊断效用。
我们回顾了13例连续的AVS和急性单侧听力损失住院患者。我们比较了MRI阳性和MRI阴性病例之间的神经学检查结果、床旁和视频头脉冲试验(bHIT、vHIT)以及其他前庭体征(包括眼球震颤、斜视和位置试验)。
13例患者中有5例存在脑桥外侧病变(即MRI阳性);8例没有(即MRI阴性)。水平半规管头脉冲试验显示,所有5例MRI阳性患者均有同侧前庭功能丧失,但仅3例MRI阴性患者有。MRI阳性组水平半规管vHIT的患侧前庭眼反射(VOR)增益显著低于MRI阴性组(0.56±0.11对0.87±0.24,P = 0.03)。所有5例MRI阳性患者均有背离病变侧的水平自发性眼球震颤(5/5)。1例患者(1/5)有凝视时方向改变的眼球震颤。2例有斜视(2/5)。在8例MRI阴性患者中,1例(1/8)表现为单侧前庭病,4例(4/8)有位置性眼球震颤,3例(3/8)有孤立的后半规管功能减退。
当AVS伴有听力损失时,水平半规管头脉冲试验在鉴别中枢性和周围性病变方面效果不佳。矛盾的是,脑桥外侧病变通常类似单侧周围性前庭病。相比之下,周围性病变患者通常表现为位置性眼球震颤或孤立的后半规管功能障碍,有被误诊为中枢性前庭病的风险。