• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工业界的资金支持与核心结局指标的更多使用相关。

Industry funding was associated with increased use of core outcome sets.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Centre for Biostatistics, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Nov;115:90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.07.007
PMID:31326541
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to assess the uptake of the rheumatoid arthritis core outcome set (RA-COS) using data from multiple data providers, and to investigate factors that may influence this uptake.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

An observational review was carried out on all clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis that were indexed on the World Health Organization-International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO-ICTRP). Various measures of COS uptake were calculated from information presented in the trial registries and trial publications. Logistic regression was conducted to investigate factors thought to be associated with planned COS uptake.

RESULTS

A total of 341 trials were eligible for the evaluation of RA-COS uptake. In the decade leading up to 2019, the assessment of uptake based on published results was maintained at just over 80%. Trials that were not commercially funded were much less likely to plan to measure the RA-COS than those with industry funding (60% vs. 80%; adjusted OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.32; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study has demonstrated that the use of the WHO-ICTRP can identify a large and geographically diverse range of trials to include in the evaluation of COS uptake.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估类风湿关节炎核心结局集(RA-COS)的采用情况,数据来源于多个数据提供者,并探讨可能影响采用的因素。

研究设计和设置

对世界卫生组织-国际临床试验注册平台(WHO-ICTRP)索引的所有类风湿关节炎临床试验进行了观察性综述。从试验注册处和试验出版物中提供的信息中计算了各种 COS 采用措施。采用逻辑回归分析了与计划采用 COS 相关的因素。

结果

共有 341 项试验符合评估 RA-COS 采用情况的条件。在 2019 年之前的十年中,基于已发表结果评估的采用率保持在 80%以上。没有商业资金支持的试验计划测量 RA-COS 的可能性远低于有行业资金支持的试验(60%比 80%;调整后的 OR 0.18,95%CI 0.11 至 0.32;P<0.001)。

结论

本研究表明,WHO-ICTRP 的使用可以识别大量具有地理多样性的试验,纳入 COS 采用情况的评估。

相似文献

1
Industry funding was associated with increased use of core outcome sets.工业界的资金支持与核心结局指标的更多使用相关。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Nov;115:90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
2
A methodological approach for assessing the uptake of core outcome sets using ClinicalTrials.gov: findings from a review of randomised controlled trials of rheumatoid arthritis.一种利用ClinicalTrials.gov评估核心结局集纳入情况的方法学途径:类风湿性关节炎随机对照试验综述的结果
BMJ. 2017 May 17;357:j2262. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2262.
3
The Uptake of the Core Outcome Set for Non-Specific Low Back Pain Clinical Trials is Poor: A Meta-Epidemiological Study of Trial Registrations.非特异性腰痛临床试验核心结局集的采用情况不佳:一项关于试验注册的元流行病学研究
J Pain. 2024 Jan;25(1):31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.08.006. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
4
Citation analysis did not provide a reliable assessment of core outcome set uptake.引文分析并未对核心结局指标集的采用情况提供可靠评估。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;86:153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
5
Outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis randomised trials over the last 50 years.过去50年类风湿关节炎随机试验中的结局指标。
Trials. 2013 Oct 9;14:324. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-324.
6
Clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis: a status report from the ClinicalTrials.gov website.类风湿关节炎临床试验:ClinicalTrials.gov 网站的现状报告。
Rheumatol Int. 2012 Jun;32(6):1831-5. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-2027-3. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
7
Assessing uptake of the core outcome set in clinical trials for immune thrombocytopenia: A cross-sectional analysis.评估免疫性血小板减少症临床试验中核心结局集的应用情况:一项横断面分析。
Thromb Res. 2024 Feb;234:113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2023.12.017. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
8
The American College of Rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. The Committee on Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials.美国风湿病学会类风湿关节炎临床试验疾病活动度测量初步核心指标集。类风湿关节炎临床试验结果测量委员会。
Arthritis Rheum. 1993 Jun;36(6):729-40. doi: 10.1002/art.1780360601.
9
Assessment of Consistency Between Peer-Reviewed Publications and Clinical Trial Registries.同行评议出版物与临床试验注册库之间的一致性评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 May 1;137(5):552-556. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0312.
10
Randomized controlled trials of rheumatoid arthritis registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: what gets published and when.临床试验.gov 注册的类风湿关节炎随机对照试验:发表情况和时间。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Oct;66(10):2664-74. doi: 10.1002/art.38784.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing 5-year follow-up of core outcome set uptake for Bronchiectasis and Hidradenitis Suppurativa: a review of trial registry entries.评估支气管扩张症和化脓性汗腺炎核心结局集应用的5年随访:试验注册条目综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 18;15(8):e095190. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095190.
2
Protocol for developing a core outcome set for medicines safety at transitions of care: a systematic review, qualitative study and Delphi consensus.制定照护转接时药物安全核心结局集的方案:一项系统评价、定性研究及德尔菲共识法
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 1;15(7):e095343. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095343.
3
How are trial outcomes prioritised by stakeholders from different regions? Analysis of an international Delphi survey to develop a core outcome set in gastric cancer surgery.
来自不同地区的利益相关者如何对试验结果进行优先级排序?一项关于制定胃癌手术核心结局集的国际德尔菲调查分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 31;16(12):e0261937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261937. eCollection 2021.
4
The standards of obstetrics and gynecology core outcome sets: A scoping review.妇产科学核心结局集的标准:一项范围综述。
Integr Med Res. 2022 Mar;11(1):100776. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2021.100776. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
5
Developing a core outcome set for traumatic brachial plexus injuries: a systematic review of outcomes.制定创伤性臂丛神经损伤的核心结局集:一项结局的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 30;11(7):e044797. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044797.
6
A systematic review finds Core Outcome Set uptake varies widely across different areas of health.一项系统评价发现,核心结局集在不同健康领域的采用情况差异很大。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:114-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.029. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
7
Primary outcome reporting in adolescent depression clinical trials needs standardization.青少年抑郁症临床试验的主要结局报告需要标准化。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 25;20(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01019-6.