Suppr超能文献

一项系统评价发现,核心结局集在不同健康领域的采用情况差异很大。

A systematic review finds Core Outcome Set uptake varies widely across different areas of health.

机构信息

MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Block F Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GL, United Kingdom.

Centre for Public Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Block B, Queen's University Belfast, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BA, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:114-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.029. Epub 2020 Sep 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our review was to bring together studies that had assessed the uptake of core outcome sets (COS) to explore the level of uptake across different COS and areas of health.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We examined the citations of 337 COS reports to identify studies that had assessed the uptake of a particular COS in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or systematic reviews (SRs).

RESULTS

We identified 24 studies that had assessed uptake in RCTs and two studies that had assessed uptake in SRs. The studies covered a total of 17/337 (5%) COS. Uptake rates reported for RCTs varied from 0% of RCTs (gout) to 82% RCTs (rheumatoid arthritis) measuring the full COS. Studies that assessed uptake of individual core outcomes showed a wide variation in uptake between the outcomes. Suggested barriers to uptake included lack of validated measures, lack of patient and other key stakeholder involvement in COS development, and lack of awareness of the COS.

CONCLUSIONS

Few studies have been undertaken to assess the uptake of COS in RCTs and SRs. Further studies are needed to assess whether COS have been implemented across a wider range of disease categories and to explore the barriers and facilitators to COS uptake.

摘要

目的

本综述的目的是汇集评估核心结局集(COS)采用情况的研究,以探索不同 COS 和卫生领域的采用程度。

研究设计和设置

我们检查了 337 个 COS 报告的引用,以确定评估特定 COS 在随机对照试验(RCT)或系统评价(SR)中采用情况的研究。

结果

我们确定了 24 项评估 RCT 中采用情况的研究和 2 项评估 SR 中采用情况的研究。这些研究总共涵盖了 17/337(5%)个 COS。报告的 RCT 采用率从 0%(痛风)到测量完整 COS 的 82%(类风湿关节炎)的 RCT 不等。评估个别核心结局采用情况的研究表明,不同结局之间的采用情况存在很大差异。采用的障碍包括缺乏经过验证的测量方法、缺乏患者和其他关键利益相关者对 COS 制定的参与,以及对 COS 的认识不足。

结论

很少有研究评估 RCT 和 SR 中 COS 的采用情况。需要进一步研究,以评估 COS 是否已在更广泛的疾病类别中得到实施,并探讨采用 COS 的障碍和促进因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0832/7815247/ed84322bb048/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
A systematic review finds Core Outcome Set uptake varies widely across different areas of health.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:114-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.029. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
2
Study found increasing use of core outcome sets in Cochrane systematic reviews and identified facilitators and barriers.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 May;169:111277. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111277. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
3
Current trends, barriers, and facilitators of use of core outcome sets in Cochrane systematic reviews: Protocol.
F1000Res. 2023 Sep 25;12:735. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.133688.2. eCollection 2023.
4
The methodological quality of systematic reviews regarding the Core Outcome Set (COS) development.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Mar 11;24(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02182-w.
5
Review finds core outcome set uptake in new studies and systematic reviews needs improvement.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;150:154-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.06.016. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Assessing the uptake of the type 1 diabetes core outcome set in randomized controlled trials: A Cross-Sectional study.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2024 Jan;207:111085. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.111085. Epub 2024 Jan 7.
10
More than half of systematic reviews have relevant core outcome sets.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;136:168-179. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.019. Epub 2021 May 8.

引用本文的文献

2
Core Outcome Sets for Pain Disorders: A Systematic Review of Research and Reporting Quality.
J Pain Res. 2025 Jul 28;18:3745-3756. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S533561. eCollection 2025.
3
A common outcome set for trials in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB COS).
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 Jul 11;11(3):e70134. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70134. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
8
Mechanical ventilation core outcome set uptake in Cochrane systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study.
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2024 Jan 10;2(1):e12038. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12038. eCollection 2024 Jan.
10
Measuring What Matters in Parkinson's Disease Research and Dysphagia: The Need for Core Outcome Sets.
Mov Disord. 2025 Jul;40(7):1260-1264. doi: 10.1002/mds.30241. Epub 2025 May 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing uptake of the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) Core Outcome Set and recommended instruments.
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Sep;183(3):566-568. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19030. Epub 2020 May 10.
3
Assessing the impact of a research funder's recommendation to consider core outcome sets.
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 13;14(9):e0222418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222418. eCollection 2019.
4
Industry funding was associated with increased use of core outcome sets.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Nov;115:90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
8
The uptake of the hip fracture core outcome set: analysis of 20 years of hip fracture trials.
Age Ageing. 2019 Jul 1;48(4):595-598. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验