• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项系统评价发现,核心结局集在不同健康领域的采用情况差异很大。

A systematic review finds Core Outcome Set uptake varies widely across different areas of health.

机构信息

MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Block F Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GL, United Kingdom.

Centre for Public Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Block B, Queen's University Belfast, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BA, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:114-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.029. Epub 2020 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.029
PMID:32987162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7815247/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our review was to bring together studies that had assessed the uptake of core outcome sets (COS) to explore the level of uptake across different COS and areas of health.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We examined the citations of 337 COS reports to identify studies that had assessed the uptake of a particular COS in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or systematic reviews (SRs).

RESULTS

We identified 24 studies that had assessed uptake in RCTs and two studies that had assessed uptake in SRs. The studies covered a total of 17/337 (5%) COS. Uptake rates reported for RCTs varied from 0% of RCTs (gout) to 82% RCTs (rheumatoid arthritis) measuring the full COS. Studies that assessed uptake of individual core outcomes showed a wide variation in uptake between the outcomes. Suggested barriers to uptake included lack of validated measures, lack of patient and other key stakeholder involvement in COS development, and lack of awareness of the COS.

CONCLUSIONS

Few studies have been undertaken to assess the uptake of COS in RCTs and SRs. Further studies are needed to assess whether COS have been implemented across a wider range of disease categories and to explore the barriers and facilitators to COS uptake.

摘要

目的

本综述的目的是汇集评估核心结局集(COS)采用情况的研究,以探索不同 COS 和卫生领域的采用程度。

研究设计和设置

我们检查了 337 个 COS 报告的引用,以确定评估特定 COS 在随机对照试验(RCT)或系统评价(SR)中采用情况的研究。

结果

我们确定了 24 项评估 RCT 中采用情况的研究和 2 项评估 SR 中采用情况的研究。这些研究总共涵盖了 17/337(5%)个 COS。报告的 RCT 采用率从 0%(痛风)到测量完整 COS 的 82%(类风湿关节炎)的 RCT 不等。评估个别核心结局采用情况的研究表明,不同结局之间的采用情况存在很大差异。采用的障碍包括缺乏经过验证的测量方法、缺乏患者和其他关键利益相关者对 COS 制定的参与,以及对 COS 的认识不足。

结论

很少有研究评估 RCT 和 SR 中 COS 的采用情况。需要进一步研究,以评估 COS 是否已在更广泛的疾病类别中得到实施,并探讨采用 COS 的障碍和促进因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0832/7815247/791ad54f81f1/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0832/7815247/ed84322bb048/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0832/7815247/dbff21833043/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0832/7815247/791ad54f81f1/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0832/7815247/ed84322bb048/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0832/7815247/dbff21833043/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0832/7815247/791ad54f81f1/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
A systematic review finds Core Outcome Set uptake varies widely across different areas of health.一项系统评价发现,核心结局集在不同健康领域的采用情况差异很大。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:114-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.029. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
2
Study found increasing use of core outcome sets in Cochrane systematic reviews and identified facilitators and barriers.研究发现Cochrane系统评价中核心结局集的使用日益增加,并确定了促进因素和障碍。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 May;169:111277. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111277. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
3
Current trends, barriers, and facilitators of use of core outcome sets in Cochrane systematic reviews: Protocol.当前在 Cochrane 系统评价中使用核心结局集的趋势、障碍和促进因素:方案。
F1000Res. 2023 Sep 25;12:735. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.133688.2. eCollection 2023.
4
The methodological quality of systematic reviews regarding the Core Outcome Set (COS) development.关于核心结局集(COS)开发的系统评价的方法学质量。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Mar 11;24(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02182-w.
5
Review finds core outcome set uptake in new studies and systematic reviews needs improvement.综述发现,新研究和系统评价中核心结局集的采用情况有待改善。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;150:154-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.06.016. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Assessing the uptake of the type 1 diabetes core outcome set in randomized controlled trials: A Cross-Sectional study.评估 1 型糖尿病核心结局集在随机对照试验中的应用:一项横断面研究。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2024 Jan;207:111085. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.111085. Epub 2024 Jan 7.
9
Core outcomes were rarely reported overall in systematic reviews on acupuncture for osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional meta-epidemiological study.系统评价中很少有关于针灸治疗骨关节炎的核心结局报告:一项横断面的meta 流行病学研究。
Acupunct Med. 2023 Jun;41(3):142-150. doi: 10.1177/09645284221108215. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
10
More than half of systematic reviews have relevant core outcome sets.超过一半的系统评价有相关的核心结局集。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;136:168-179. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.019. Epub 2021 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing 5-year follow-up of core outcome set uptake for Bronchiectasis and Hidradenitis Suppurativa: a review of trial registry entries.评估支气管扩张症和化脓性汗腺炎核心结局集应用的5年随访:试验注册条目综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 18;15(8):e095190. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095190.
2
Core Outcome Sets for Pain Disorders: A Systematic Review of Research and Reporting Quality.疼痛障碍的核心结局集:研究与报告质量的系统评价
J Pain Res. 2025 Jul 28;18:3745-3756. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S533561. eCollection 2025.
3
A common outcome set for trials in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB COS).

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing uptake of the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) Core Outcome Set and recommended instruments.评估湿疹统一结局测量指标(HOME)核心结局集及推荐工具的采用情况。
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Sep;183(3):566-568. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19030. Epub 2020 May 10.
2
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.选择重要的健康结局用于比较效果研究:对用于研究的核心结局集的系统评价的第 5 次年度更新。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 12;14(12):e0225980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225980. eCollection 2019.
3
Assessing the impact of a research funder's recommendation to consider core outcome sets.
路易体痴呆试验的通用结局集(DLB COS)。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 Jul 11;11(3):e70134. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70134. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
4
Developing a core outcome set for gender-affirming healthcare in transgender and gender diverse adults in Sweden using the Delphi approach: a study protocol.采用德尔菲法为瑞典跨性别和性别多样化成年人制定性别确认医疗保健核心结局集:一项研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 8;15(7):e098300. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098300.
5
Core outcome set for research in necrotising soft tissue infection patients: an international, multidisciplinary, modified Delphi consensus study.坏死性软组织感染患者研究的核心结局集:一项国际多学科改良德尔菲共识研究
Diving Hyperb Med. 2025 Jun 30;55(2):91-103. doi: 10.28920/dhm55.2.91-103.
6
Uptake of the IMMPACT-recommended core outcome set in randomised controlled trials on chronic neck or shoulder pain: a cross-sectional study.慢性颈肩痛随机对照试验中IMMPACT推荐的核心结局指标的纳入情况:一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 19;15(6):e094482. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094482.
7
Protocol for the development of a transdiagnostic core outcome set for mental health disorders in adults: the Patient Important Outcomes in Psychiatry (PIO-Psych) Initiative.成人心理健康障碍跨诊断核心结局集的制定方案:精神病学患者重要结局(PIO-Psych)倡议。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 9;15(6):e093958. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093958.
8
Mechanical ventilation core outcome set uptake in Cochrane systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study.Cochrane系统评价中机械通气核心结局集的应用:一项横断面研究。
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2024 Jan 10;2(1):e12038. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12038. eCollection 2024 Jan.
9
How do we measure dysarthria after stroke? A systematic review to guide the core outcome set for dysarthria.中风后我们如何测量构音障碍?一项指导构音障碍核心结局集的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2025 May 23;15(5):e099662. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099662.
10
Measuring What Matters in Parkinson's Disease Research and Dysphagia: The Need for Core Outcome Sets.衡量帕金森病研究和吞咽困难中的关键因素:核心结局集的必要性。
Mov Disord. 2025 Jul;40(7):1260-1264. doi: 10.1002/mds.30241. Epub 2025 May 23.
评估研究资助者建议考虑核心结局集的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 13;14(9):e0222418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222418. eCollection 2019.
4
Industry funding was associated with increased use of core outcome sets.工业界的资金支持与核心结局指标的更多使用相关。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Nov;115:90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
5
Awareness and acceptability of Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials core outcome set for chronic pain among surveyed neuropathic pain authors.调查神经性疼痛作者对临床试验方法、测量和疼痛评估倡议核心结局集用于慢性疼痛的知晓和可接受性。
J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Jul;8(9):671-683. doi: 10.2217/cer-2018-0123. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
6
World Workshop in Oral Medicine VII: Reporting of IMMPACT-recommended outcome domains in randomized controlled trials of burning mouth syndrome: A systematic review.世界口腔医学研讨会 VII:随机对照试验中报告 IMMPACT 推荐的口腔灼口综合征结局指标:系统评价。
Oral Dis. 2019 Jun;25 Suppl 1:122-140. doi: 10.1111/odi.13053.
7
Outcome Domains, Outcome Measures, and Characteristics of Randomized Controlled Trials Testing Nonsurgical Interventions for Osteoarthritis.针对骨关节炎非手术干预的随机对照试验的结果领域、结果测量指标及特征
J Rheumatol. 2020 Jan;47(1):126-131. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180985. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
8
The uptake of the hip fracture core outcome set: analysis of 20 years of hip fracture trials.髋关节骨折核心结局集的应用:20 年髋关节骨折试验分析。
Age Ageing. 2019 Jul 1;48(4):595-598. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz018.
9
Uptake of the OMERACT-OARSI Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Core Outcome Set: Review of Randomized Controlled Trials from 1997 to 2017.1997 年至 2017 年随机对照试验中 OMERACT-OARSI 髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎核心结局集的应用情况:综述。
J Rheumatol. 2019 Aug;46(8):976-980. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.181066. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
10
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.选择重要的健康结局进行比较效果研究:对用于研究的核心结局集进行系统评价的第 4 次年度更新。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 28;13(12):e0209869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209869. eCollection 2018.