• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较触觉模式对行走平衡控制的影响:使用一只或两只手臂更好吗?

Comparing the effect of haptic modalities on walking balance control: Is using one or two arms better?

机构信息

College of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

College of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

出版信息

Hum Mov Sci. 2019 Oct;67:102495. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.102495. Epub 2019 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2019.102495
PMID:31326741
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adding haptic input by lightly touching a railing or using haptic anchors may improve walking balance control. Typical use of the railing(s) and haptic anchors requires the use of one and two arms in an extended position, respectively. It is unclear whether it is arm configuration and/or the number of arms used or the addition of sensory input that affects walking balance control.

RESEARCH QUESTION

This study examined whether using one arm or two arms to add haptic input through light touch on a railing or using the haptic anchors affects walking balance control.

METHODS

In this study, young adults (n = 24) walked while using (actual use) or pretending to use (pretend use) the railing(s) and haptic anchors with one or two arms. Inertial-based sensors (Mobility Lab, APDM) were used to measure stride velocity, relative time spent in double support (%DS), and peak normalized medio-lateral trunk velocity (pnMLTV).

RESULTS

Using two arms lead to a decrease in pnMLTV compared to using one arm and pnMLTV was lower in the actual use trials compared to the pretend use trials for the anchors only. Stride velocity and %DS did not change between trials when one or two arms were used or when participants actually or pretended to use the haptic tools. Participants walked slower when using the railing compared to the anchors.

SIGNIFICANCE

The importance of considering the number of arms is highlighted in the improved balance control when using two arms with either tool. The augmented sensory input adds to the stabilizing effect of arm configuration for the anchors but not the railings. These results have implications for future research and rehabilitation efforts emphasizing sensorimotor integration to improve walking balance control.

摘要

背景

轻轻触摸栏杆或使用触觉锚定点来增加触觉输入,可以改善步行平衡控制。典型的栏杆和触觉锚定点使用方式分别需要手臂伸展到一个和两个位置。目前尚不清楚影响步行平衡控制的是手臂配置和/或使用手臂的数量,还是增加的感官输入。

研究问题

本研究通过比较使用单臂或双臂轻触栏杆或使用触觉锚定点来增加触觉输入,来探究使用单臂或双臂对步行平衡控制的影响。

方法

在这项研究中,年轻成年人(n=24)在使用(实际使用)或假装使用(假装使用)单臂或双臂栏杆和触觉锚定点时进行行走。惯性传感器(Mobility Lab,APDM)用于测量步速、双支撑时间百分比(%DS)和峰值归一化中侧躯干速度(pnMLTV)。

结果

与使用单臂相比,使用双臂导致 pnMLTV 降低,仅使用锚定点时实际使用试验的 pnMLTV 低于假装使用试验。当使用单臂或双臂,或当参与者实际或假装使用触觉工具时,步速和%DS在试验之间没有变化。与使用锚定点相比,参与者使用栏杆时行走速度较慢。

意义

这些结果强调了在使用任何工具时,双臂的重要性可以提高平衡控制能力。增加的感官输入增加了手臂配置的稳定效果,对于锚定点是如此,但对于栏杆则不然。这些结果对未来强调感觉运动整合以改善步行平衡控制的研究和康复工作具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Comparing the effect of haptic modalities on walking balance control: Is using one or two arms better?比较触觉模式对行走平衡控制的影响:使用一只或两只手臂更好吗?
Hum Mov Sci. 2019 Oct;67:102495. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.102495. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
2
Different haptic tools reduce trunk velocity in the frontal plane during walking, but haptic anchors have advantages over lightly touching a railing.不同的触觉工具在行走过程中可降低额状面的躯干速度,但触觉锚点比轻触栏杆具有优势。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Jun;235(6):1731-1739. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4921-8. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
3
Are there attentional demands associated with haptic modalities while walking in young, healthy adults?在年轻健康的成年人行走时,触觉模态是否存在注意力需求?
Hum Mov Sci. 2019 Aug;66:399-406. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
4
The effect of light touch on balance control during overground walking in healthy young adults.轻触对健康年轻成年人在地面行走时平衡控制的影响。
Heliyon. 2017 Dec 28;3(12):e00484. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00484. eCollection 2017 Dec.
5
The effects of haptic input on biomechanical and neurophysiological parameters of walking: A scoping review.触觉输入对步行生物力学和神经生理学参数的影响:一项范围综述。
Gait Posture. 2017 Oct;58:232-239. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
6
Trunk balance control during beam walking improves with the haptic anchors without the interference of an auditory-cognitive task in older adults.在老年人中,在没有听觉认知任务干扰的情况下,使用触觉锚点可改善束步行时的躯干平衡控制。
Gait Posture. 2020 Sep;81:166-171. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.07.067. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
7
Adding Light Touch While Walking in Older Adults: Biomechanical and Neuromotor Effects.老年人行走时增加轻触:生物力学和神经运动效应
J Aging Phys Act. 2020 Feb 20;28(5):680-685. doi: 10.1123/japa.2019-0270. Print 2020 Oct 1.
8
Sensorimotor integration during stance: processing time of active or passive addition or withdrawal of visual or haptic information.站立时的感觉运动整合:主动或被动添加或撤回视觉或触觉信息的处理时间。
Neuroscience. 2012 Jun 14;212:59-76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.03.044. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
9
The effects of light touch on gait and dynamic balance during normal and tandem walking in individuals with an incomplete spinal cord injury.轻触对不完全性脊髓损伤患者正常和双足行走时步态和动态平衡的影响。
Spinal Cord. 2021 Feb;59(2):159-166. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-0516-5. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
10
Three days of beam walking practice improves dynamic balance control regardless of the use of haptic anchors in older adults.三天的束棒行走练习可改善老年人的动态平衡控制,无论是否使用触觉锚定。
Neurosci Lett. 2022 Jun 11;781:136682. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2022.136682. Epub 2022 May 16.