Tam Vivian, You John J, Bernacki Rachelle
1 Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
2 Departments of Medicine, and Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Dec;36(12):1096-1104. doi: 10.1177/1049909119857988. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
Having early discussions with seriously ill patients about their priorities and values can improve their peace of mind and family outcomes during bereavement; however, physicians and medical students report feeling underprepared to hold serious illness conversations. We evaluated the impact of the Serious Illness Care Program clinician training workshop on medical learners' knowledge of comfort and confidence in holding such conversations.
Eligible learners were penultimate- or final-year medical students or first-year residents of generalist programs (Family Medicine, Internal Medicine). Learners participated in a 2.5-hour workshop involving reflection on serious illness discussions, didactic teaching and demonstration of the Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG), role play with standardized patients, direct observation, and feedback from experts. Participants completed pre- and post-intervention questionnaires with Likert-type scale and open-ended questions, which were analyzed using paired tests and qualitative content analysis, respectively.
We enrolled 25 learners. The intervention was associated with an increase in knowledge ( < .001) and self-efficacy ( < .001). All learners reported gaining new skills, with a majority specifically identifying a framework for structuring serious illness conversations in the qualitative analysis (n = 14, 56%). Participants stated the workshops would improve their comfort in holding serious illness conversations (n = 24, 96%), and that it would be valuable to integrate the workshops into their formal curricula (n = 23, 92%).
Training on the use of the SICG is novel for medical students and first-year residents and associated with the improvement in their knowledge of and perceived capacity to hold serious illness conversations. This study suggests that the integration of SICG training into medical curricula may have educational value.
与重症患者尽早讨论他们的优先事项和价值观,可在患者丧亲期间改善其心境平和程度及家庭状况;然而,医生和医学生表示,他们在进行重病相关谈话方面准备不足。我们评估了重症护理计划临床医生培训工作坊对医学学习者在进行此类谈话时关于舒适度和信心方面知识的影响。
符合条件的学习者为医学专业倒数第二年或最后一年的学生,或通科项目(家庭医学、内科)的一年级住院医师。学习者参加了一个2.5小时的工作坊,内容包括对重病相关谈话的反思、讲授教学以及《重病谈话指南》(SICG)的演示、与标准化患者进行角色扮演、直接观察以及专家反馈。参与者完成了干预前后的问卷,问卷采用李克特量表和开放式问题,分别使用配对检验和定性内容分析进行分析。
我们招募了25名学习者。干预与知识增加(P <.001)和自我效能提高(P <.001)相关。所有学习者都报告获得了新技能,在定性分析中,大多数人特别提到了构建重病谈话的框架(n = 14,56%)。参与者表示,这些工作坊将提高他们进行重病谈话时的舒适度(n = 24,96%),并且将这些工作坊纳入正式课程很有价值(n = 23,92%)。
对于医学生和一年级住院医师而言,关于使用SICG的培训是新颖的,并且与他们进行重病谈话的知识和感知能力的提高相关。这项研究表明,将SICG培训纳入医学课程可能具有教育价值。