• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2011 年至 2017 年期间英格兰颈动脉内膜切除术模式的变化。

Changing Patterns of Carotid Endarterectomy Between 2011 and 2017 in England.

机构信息

From the Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, United Kingdom (A.S.J., S.W., K.H., D.A.C.).

St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (I.M.L.).

出版信息

Stroke. 2019 Sep;50(9):2461-2468. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025231. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025231
PMID:31327312
Abstract

Background and Purpose- Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) reduces the risk of stroke in recently symptomatic patients and less so in asymptomatic patients. Recent evidence suggests that the number of CEAs may be declining. The aim of this study was to investigate annual patterns of CEA in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients in England from 2011 to 2017. Methods- Data from the National Vascular Registry were used to describe (1) the number of CEA procedures in England and its 9 geographic regions from 2011 to 2017, (2) the characteristics of patients undergoing CEA, and (3) whether rates of CEA correlated with the number of vascular arterial units within each region. Annual stroke incidence for each region was derived from official population figures and the number of index stroke admissions per year. Results- The overall number of CEAs performed in England fell from 4992 in 2011 to 3482 in 2017, a 30% decline. Among symptomatic patients, there was a 25% decline, the number of CEAs falling from 4270 to 3217. In asymptomatic patients, there were 722 CEAs performed in 2011 and 265 in 2017, a 63% decline. CEAs per 100 000 adults within all regions declined over time but the size of change varied across the regions (range, 1.7-5.5 per 100 000). The regional numbers of CEAs per year were associated with changes in the regional stroke incidence, the proportion of CEAs performed in asymptomatic patients, and the number of hospitals performing CEA. Conclusions- This population-based study revealed a 63% decline in CEAs among asymptomatic patients between 2011 and 2017, possibly because of changing attitudes in the role of CEA. Reasons for the 25% decline in CEAs among symptomatic patients are unclear as UK guidelines on CEA have not changed for these patients. Whether the proportion of symptomatic patients with 50% to 99% ipsilateral stenosis has changed requires investigation.

摘要

背景与目的-颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)可降低近期症状性患者和无症状患者的中风风险。最近的证据表明,CEA 的数量可能正在下降。本研究的目的是调查 2011 年至 2017 年期间英国无症状和有症状患者的 CEA 年度模式。方法-使用国家血管登记处的数据,描述了(1)2011 年至 2017 年英格兰的 CEA 手术数量及其 9 个地区,(2)接受 CEA 的患者的特征,以及(3)CEA 率是否与每个地区的血管动脉单位数量相关。每个地区的年度中风发病率是根据官方人口数据和每年的指数中风入院人数得出的。结果-英格兰进行的 CEA 总数从 2011 年的 4992 例下降到 2017 年的 3482 例,下降了 30%。在有症状的患者中,下降了 25%,CEA 从 4270 例下降到 3217 例。在无症状患者中,2011 年进行了 722 例 CEA,2017 年进行了 265 例,下降了 63%。所有地区的每 10 万成年人 CEA 数量随着时间的推移而下降,但变化幅度在各地区之间有所不同(范围为每 10 万人 1.7-5.5 例)。每年 CEA 的区域数量与区域中风发病率的变化、无症状患者中 CEA 的实施比例以及实施 CEA 的医院数量相关。结论-这项基于人群的研究显示,2011 年至 2017 年间,无症状患者的 CEA 数量下降了 63%,这可能是由于 CEA 作用的观念发生了变化。有症状患者的 CEA 数量下降 25%的原因尚不清楚,因为英国针对这些患者的 CEA 指南没有改变。需要调查 50%-99%同侧狭窄的有症状患者比例是否发生了变化。

相似文献

1
Changing Patterns of Carotid Endarterectomy Between 2011 and 2017 in England.2011 年至 2017 年期间英格兰颈动脉内膜切除术模式的变化。
Stroke. 2019 Sep;50(9):2461-2468. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025231. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
2
Defining the threshold surgeon volume associated with improved patient outcomes for carotid endarterectomy.确定颈动脉内膜切除术患者结局改善相关的外科医生手术量阈值。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;72(1):209-218.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.057. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
3
Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy in a multicenter regional registry.多中心区域性注册研究中的颈动脉内膜切除术术后再狭窄。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Oct;52(4):897-904, 905.e1-2; discussion 904-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.005.
4
A stroke/vascular neurology service increases the volume of urgent carotid endarterectomies performed in a tertiary referral center.中风/血管神经病学服务增加了三级转诊中心进行的紧急颈动脉内膜切除术的数量。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Jul;28(5):1172-7. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
5
Impact of practice patterns in shunt use during carotid endarterectomy with contralateral carotid occlusion.在伴有对侧颈动脉闭塞的颈动脉内膜切除术中转流管使用实践模式的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jan;55(1):61-71.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.046. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
6
Addition of proximal intervention to carotid endarterectomy increases risk of stroke and death.颈动脉内膜切除术加近端干预增加中风和死亡的风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Apr;69(4):1102-1110. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.042. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
7
Early carotid endarterectomy performed 2 to 5 days after the onset of neurologic symptoms leads to comparable results to carotid endarterectomy performed at later time points.在神经症状出现后2至5天内进行早期颈动脉内膜切除术,其结果与在更晚时间点进行颈动脉内膜切除术相当。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Dec;66(6):1719-1726. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.101. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
8
The effect of surgeon's specialty and volume on the perioperative outcome of carotid endarterectomy.外科医生的专业和手术量对颈动脉内膜切除术围手术期结果的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Sep;58(3):666-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.02.016. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
9
Redo carotid endarterectomy versus primary carotid endarterectomy.再次颈动脉内膜切除术与初次颈动脉内膜切除术对比
Stroke. 2001 Dec 1;32(12):2787-92. doi: 10.1161/hs1201.099649.
10
The Efficacy of Carotid Surgery by Subgroups: The Concept of Stroke Prevention Potential.颈动脉手术的疗效分组分析:卒中预防潜能概念。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58(1):5-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Endarterectomy and Stenting in the Treatment of Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Real-World Nationwide, Total Population-Based Study from Korea.颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄的比较:一项来自韩国的基于全国总人口的真实世界研究。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025;31(1). doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.24-00177.
2
External validity of randomized clinical trials in vascular surgery: systematic review of demographic factors of patients recruited to randomized clinical trials with comparison to the National Vascular Registry.血管外科随机临床试验的外部效度:对随机临床试验招募患者的人口统计学因素与国家血管登记处进行比较的系统评价
BJS Open. 2025 Mar 4;9(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae156.
3
Extra-Cranial Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Objective Analysis of the Available Evidence.
颅外颈动脉狭窄:现有证据的客观分析
Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 21;13:739999. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.739999. eCollection 2022.
4
Impact of the first COVID-19 pandemic peak and lockdown on the interventional management of carotid artery stenosis in France.新冠疫情第一波高峰和封锁对法国颈动脉狭窄介入治疗管理的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 May;75(5):1670-1678.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.11.064. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
5
Carotid interventions and evidence-based medicine: not always an easy marriage.颈动脉介入治疗与循证医学:并非总是天作之合。
Br J Surg. 2021 May 27;108(5):451-452. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab038.
6
Monitoring indirect impact of COVID-19 pandemic on services for cardiovascular diseases in the UK.监测 COVID-19 大流行对英国心血管疾病服务间接影响。
Heart. 2020 Dec;106(24):1890-1897. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317870. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
7
Contemporary Trends in Physician Utilization Rates of CEA and CAS for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis among Medicare Beneficiaries.当代 Medicare 受益人群无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者行 CEA 和 CAS 治疗的医师使用率趋势。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Feb;71:132-144. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.08.118. Epub 2020 Sep 3.