Warner Stephen J, Garner Matthew R, Fabricant Peter D, Schottel Patrick C, Loftus Michael L, Hentel Keith D, Helfet David L, Lorich Dean G
1University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite 1700, Houston, TX 70030 USA.
2Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA USA.
HSS J. 2019 Jul;15(2):115-121. doi: 10.1007/s11420-018-09655-x. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
Operative indications for supination-external rotation (SER) ankle fractures depend on the integrity of the medial structures. Despite the importance of assessing deep deltoid ligament injuries, the accuracy of common diagnostic tests has not been established.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The objective of this study was to compare the ability of injury (non-stress) and stress radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to diagnose deep deltoid ligament ruptures in operative SER ankle fractures.
Patients were included who underwent surgical fixation of SER ankle fractures and had appropriate injury and manual stress test radiographs, pre-operative ankle MRI, and intra-operative assessment of deep deltoid integrity by direct visualization. The medial clear space (MCS) was considered positive for all values over 5 mm on the injury or stress mortise radiographs. MRI analysis of the deep deltoid ligament injury was performed by blinded fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists. Intra-operative direct visualization and assessment of the deltoid was performed using a direct medial ankle approach at the time of operative fracture fixation.
Using intra-operative visualization as the gold standard, MCS measurements and MRI had differing abilities to diagnose a deep deltoid rupture. In cases where the MCS was less than 5 mm on injury radiographs and stress tests were performed, MCS measurements were much less accurate than MRI in predicting deltoid ruptures (46% versus 79%, respectively) with a high false positive rate (80%). In contrast, an MCS measurement of greater than 5 mm on injury radiographs was a strong predictor of deep deltoid rupture (accuracy of 95%).
Compared with direct visualization of the deltoid ligament intra-operatively, these data support proceeding with surgery when the MCS on injury radiographs is greater than 5 mm without any additional stress tests or advanced imaging. When the MCS is less than 5 mm, we recommend MRI analysis because of its increased accuracy and decreased false positive rate. Improving our ability to diagnose deltoid ruptures will contribute to more effective management of patients with SER ankle fractures.
旋后-外旋(SER)型踝关节骨折的手术指征取决于内侧结构的完整性。尽管评估三角韧带深层损伤很重要,但常用诊断检查的准确性尚未得到证实。
问题/目的:本研究的目的是比较损伤(非应力)X线片、应力X线片和磁共振成像(MRI)诊断手术治疗的SER型踝关节骨折中三角韧带深层断裂的能力。
纳入接受SER型踝关节骨折手术固定且有合适的损伤及手法应力试验X线片、术前踝关节MRI以及术中通过直接观察评估三角韧带深层完整性的患者。损伤或应力位踝关节正位X线片上内侧间隙(MCS)大于5 mm均视为阳性。由接受过专科培训的肌肉骨骼放射科医生对三角韧带深层损伤进行盲法MRI分析。在手术骨折固定时,采用踝关节内侧直接入路对三角韧带进行术中直接观察和评估。
以术中观察为金标准,MCS测量和MRI诊断三角韧带深层断裂的能力不同。在损伤X线片上MCS小于5 mm且进行了应力试验的病例中,MCS测量在预测三角韧带断裂方面远不如MRI准确(分别为46%和79%),假阳性率高(80%)。相比之下,损伤X线片上MCS大于5 mm是三角韧带深层断裂的有力预测指标(准确率95%)。
与术中三角韧带的直接观察相比,这些数据支持当损伤X线片上的MCS大于5 mm时,无需任何额外的应力试验或高级影像学检查即可进行手术。当MCS小于5 mm时,我们建议进行MRI分析,因为其准确性更高且假阳性率更低。提高我们诊断三角韧带断裂的能力将有助于更有效地治疗SER型踝关节骨折患者。