Kitay Alison, Widmann Roger F, Doyle Shevaun M, Do Huong T, Green Daniel W
MedStar Orthopaedic Institute, 18109 Prince Philip Drive, Olney, MD 20832 USA.
2Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021 USA.
HSS J. 2019 Jul;15(2):153-158. doi: 10.1007/s11420-018-09657-9. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
Infants previously treated for developmental dysplasia of the hips (DDH) are routinely imaged with ultrasound initially and reimaged with an anteroposterior (AP) pelvis X-ray at 6 months of age to assess for dysplasia. It has become convention to transition from ultrasound to AP X-ray at 6 months of age, but no study has demonstrated that ultrasound is inadequate at this age.
QUESTION/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to confirm that ultrasound for the 6-month DDH evaluation is a feasible alternative to the standard X-ray.
Thirty-one 5- to 7-month-old infants undergoing AP pelvis X-ray related to previous Pavlik harness treatment for DDH or to a history of breech presentation were prospectively enrolled. All patients were imaged with an AP pelvis X-ray and bilateral hip ultrasounds. Three senior orthopedic surgeons unfamiliar with the patient histories evaluated both types of imaging for standard measures of hip dysplasia, including acetabular index (AI), alpha angle, and bony rim percent coverage of the femoral head. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for the X-ray and ultrasound measures.
Good quality ultrasound images were obtained in all patients, despite the presence of the ossific nucleus in 66% of the hips. All three reviewers correctly diagnosed the one dislocated hip via both X-ray and ultrasound. There were no false negatives on ultrasound, and none of the patients with negative ultrasounds required treatment during the mean 26 months of follow up. An increased AI on X-ray was correlated with lower percent coverage of the femoral head on ultrasound.
Ultrasound is a technically feasible DDH imaging modality that can be used as an alternative to X-ray for 6-month-olds.
曾接受发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH)治疗的婴儿通常一开始接受超声检查,在6个月大时再进行骨盆前后位(AP)X光检查以评估发育不良情况。6个月大时从超声检查过渡到APX光检查已成为惯例,但尚无研究表明此时超声检查不充分。
问题/目的:本研究的目的是确认6个月大时用于DDH评估的超声检查是标准X光检查的可行替代方法。
前瞻性纳入31例5至7个月大的婴儿,这些婴儿因之前接受过DDH的 Pavlik 吊带治疗或有臀位产史而接受骨盆APX光检查。所有患者均接受了骨盆APX光检查和双侧髋关节超声检查。三位不熟悉患者病史的资深骨科医生对两种影像学检查进行评估,以测量髋关节发育不良的标准指标,包括髋臼指数(AI)、α角和股骨头的骨缘覆盖率。计算X光和超声测量结果的Pearson相关系数。
尽管66%的髋关节存在骨化核,但所有患者均获得了高质量的超声图像。三位评估者均通过X光和超声正确诊断出一例髋关节脱位。超声检查无假阴性,在平均26个月的随访期间,超声检查阴性的患者均无需治疗。X光上AI增加与超声上股骨头覆盖率降低相关。
超声是一种技术上可行的DDH成像方式,可作为6个月大婴儿X光检查的替代方法。