• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Does Change in Attention Control Mediate the Impact of tDCS on Attentional Bias for Threat? Limited Evidence from a Double-blind Sham-controlled Experiment in an Unselected Sample.注意力控制的变化是否介导了经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对威胁性注意偏向的影响?来自一项针对未筛选样本的双盲假刺激对照实验的有限证据。
Psychol Belg. 2019 Jan 15;59(1):16-32. doi: 10.5334/pb.449.
2
Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on attentional bias for threat: a proof-of-concept study among individuals with social anxiety disorder.经颅直流电刺激对威胁性注意偏向的影响:一项针对社交焦虑障碍个体的概念验证研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Feb 1;12(2):251-260. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw119.
3
Impact of Anodal and Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex during Attention Bias Modification: An Eye-Tracking Study.注意力偏向矫正期间经颅直流电刺激阳极和阴极刺激左侧背外侧前额叶皮质的影响:一项眼动追踪研究
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 24;10(4):e0124182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124182. eCollection 2015.
4
The Impact of Anodal tDCS on the Attentional Networks as a Function of Trait Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms: A Preregistered Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Experiment.作为特质焦虑和抑郁症状函数的阳极经颅直流电刺激对注意网络的影响:一项预注册的双盲假对照实验。
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2020 Aug;17(4):225-235. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20200404.
5
Attentional bias mediates the effect of neurostimulation on emotional vulnerability.注意偏向介导了神经刺激对情绪易损性的影响。
J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Oct;93:12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 May 22.
6
The causal role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the modification of attentional bias: evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation.背外侧前额叶皮层在注意偏向修正中的因果作用:经颅直流电刺激的证据。
Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Dec 15;76(12):946-52. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
7
Neurocognitive mechanisms behind emotional attention: Inverse effects of anodal tDCS over the left and right DLPFC on gaze disengagement from emotional faces.情绪注意力背后的神经认知机制:左右背外侧前额叶皮质阳极经颅直流电刺激对从情绪面孔上移开注视的反向作用。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Jun;18(3):485-494. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0582-8.
8
Modulation of cortical responses by transcranial direct current stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A resting-state EEG and TMS-EEG study.经颅直流电刺激背外侧前额叶皮层对皮质反应的调制:静息态 EEG 和 TMS-EEG 研究。
Brain Stimul. 2018 Sep-Oct;11(5):1024-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
9
The effect of bicephalic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on the attentional bias for threat: A transcranial direct current stimulation study.背外侧前额叶皮层双侧刺激对威胁性注意偏向的影响:一项经颅直流电刺激研究。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Oct;17(5):1048-1057. doi: 10.3758/s13415-017-0532-x.
10
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Targeting Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Modulates Task-Induced Acute Pain in Healthy Volunteers.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)靶向左侧背外侧前额叶皮层可调节健康志愿者任务诱导的急性疼痛。
Pain Med. 2016 Apr;17(4):737-45. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnv042. Epub 2015 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
No Impact of Tdcs on Stress-Induced State Rumination and no Influence of Executive Control and Trait Rumination: A Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Within-Subjects Study.经颅直流电刺激对压力诱发的状态反刍无影响,执行控制和特质反刍也无影响:一项双盲假对照的受试者内研究。
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2024 Feb;21(1):99-109. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20240107.
2
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Augments the Effects of Gamified, Mobile Attention Bias Modification.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)增强了游戏化移动注意力偏差修正的效果。
Front Neuroergon. 2021 May 19;2:652162. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2021.652162. eCollection 2021.
3
The Impact of Anodal tDCS on the Attentional Networks as a Function of Trait Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms: A Preregistered Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Experiment.作为特质焦虑和抑郁症状函数的阳极经颅直流电刺激对注意网络的影响:一项预注册的双盲假对照实验。
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2020 Aug;17(4):225-235. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20200404.

本文引用的文献

1
A meta-analysis of bias at baseline in RCTs of attention bias modification: No evidence for dot-probe bias towards threat in clinical anxiety and PTSD.注意偏向修改的 RCT 中基线偏倚的荟萃分析:临床焦虑和 PTSD 中没有指向威胁的点探测偏向的证据。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 Aug;128(6):563-573. doi: 10.1037/abn0000406.
2
Attentional bias for threat: Crisis or opportunity?注意偏向威胁:危机还是机遇?
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Apr;69:4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 21.
3
Neurocognitive mechanisms behind emotional attention: Inverse effects of anodal tDCS over the left and right DLPFC on gaze disengagement from emotional faces.情绪注意力背后的神经认知机制:左右背外侧前额叶皮质阳极经颅直流电刺激对从情绪面孔上移开注视的反向作用。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Jun;18(3):485-494. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0582-8.
4
Deconstructing trait anxiety: a network perspective.剖析特质焦虑:网络视角。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2018 May;31(3):262-276. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2018.1439263. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
5
The Effect of Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Attention Network Function in Healthy Volunteers.前额叶经颅直流电刺激对健康志愿者注意力网络功能的影响。
Neuromodulation. 2018 Jun;21(4):355-361. doi: 10.1111/ner.12629. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
6
Correlates of Social Exclusion in Social Anxiety Disorder: An fMRI study.社交焦虑障碍中社会排斥的相关性:一项 fMRI 研究。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 21;7(1):260. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00310-9.
7
Attentional impairments in Huntington's disease: A specific deficit for the executive conflict.亨廷顿舞蹈症中的注意力损伤:执行冲突的特定缺陷
Neuropsychology. 2017 May;31(4):424-436. doi: 10.1037/neu0000321. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
8
Differential impairments across attentional networks in binge drinking.暴饮暴食者注意力网络的差异损伤
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Apr;234(7):1059-1068. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4538-4. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
9
The dot-probe task to measure emotional attention: A suitable measure in comparative studies?点探测任务测量情绪注意:在比较研究中是一种合适的测量方法吗?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1686-1717. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1224-1.
10
Anxiety and attention to threat: Cognitive mechanisms and treatment with attention bias modification.焦虑与对威胁的关注:认知机制及注意偏向矫正治疗
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Dec;87:76-108. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 7.

注意力控制的变化是否介导了经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对威胁性注意偏向的影响?来自一项针对未筛选样本的双盲假刺激对照实验的有限证据。

Does Change in Attention Control Mediate the Impact of tDCS on Attentional Bias for Threat? Limited Evidence from a Double-blind Sham-controlled Experiment in an Unselected Sample.

作者信息

Coussement Charlotte, Maurage Pierre, Billieux Joël, Heeren Alexandre

机构信息

Cellule de Recherche et Publications Scientifiques (CRPS), Hôpital Psychiatrique du Beau Vallon, Namur, BE.

Psychological Science Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BE.

出版信息

Psychol Belg. 2019 Jan 15;59(1):16-32. doi: 10.5334/pb.449.

DOI:10.5334/pb.449
PMID:31328008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6625550/
Abstract

Neurocognitive models of attentional bias for threat posit that attentional bias may result from a decreased activation of the left prefrontal cortex, and especially of its dorsolateral part (dlPFC), resulting in an impaired attention control. Consequently, a transient increase of neural activity within the left dlPFC via non-invasive brain stimulation reduces attentional bias among both anxious and nonanxious participants. Yet, it is still unclear whether the impact of dlPFC activation on attentional bias is mediated by improvement in attention control. In this experiment, we sought to test this hypothesis in an unselected sample ( = 20). Accordingly, we adopted a double-blind within-subject protocol in which we delivered a single-session of anodal sham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) over the left dlPFC during the completion of a task assessing attention control. We also assessed its subsequent impact on attentional bias. Neither attention control nor attentional bias did significantly improve following anodal tDCS. Although our results do not support our main hypothesis, we believe the present null results to be particularly useful for future meta-research in the field. We also formulated a series of methodological recommendations for future research aiming at testing the tDCS-induced modification of attentional bias.

摘要

针对威胁的注意偏向的神经认知模型认为,注意偏向可能是由于左前额叶皮质,尤其是其背外侧部分(dlPFC)的激活减少,导致注意控制受损所致。因此,通过非侵入性脑刺激使左dlPFC内的神经活动短暂增加,可减少焦虑和非焦虑参与者的注意偏向。然而,dlPFC激活对注意偏向的影响是否通过注意控制的改善来介导仍不清楚。在本实验中,我们试图在一个未经过筛选的样本(n = 20)中检验这一假设。因此,我们采用了双盲被试内实验方案,在完成一项评估注意控制的任务过程中,对左dlPFC进行单节次的阳极或假经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)。我们还评估了其随后对注意偏向的影响。阳极tDCS后,注意控制和注意偏向均未显著改善。尽管我们的结果不支持我们的主要假设,但我们认为目前的阴性结果对该领域未来的元研究特别有用。我们还为未来旨在测试tDCS引起的注意偏向改变的研究制定了一系列方法学建议。