• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑损伤伴痉挛患者结局测量用腿部活动测量量表(LegA)的心理测量学评估。

Psychometric evaluation of the leg activity measure (LegA) for outcome measurement in people with brain injury and spasticity.

机构信息

Regional Hyper-acute Rehabilitation Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.

Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Apr;43(7):976-987. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1643933. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1080/09638288.2019.1643933
PMID:31328963
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the properties of the Leg Activity measure according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments.

METHOD

Participants were assessed at baseline, one day, 6 weeks and 12 weeks, following treatment for leg spasticity with botulinum toxin and physical interventions.

RESULTS

In stage 1, 64 participants were recruited to evaluate the initial psychometric properties of Leg Activity measure. In stage 2, 100 additional participants were recruited, to evaluate the scaling properties. Total sample of 164 participants was used. Construct validity was supported for "passive function", "active function" and "impact on quality of life". Cronbach's alpha was 0.86, 0.97 and 0.87 respectively for the scales. Item level test-retest agreement ranged from 91-97% (Kappa 0.75-0.95). Following treatment for spasticity ( = 64), the Leg Activity measure "passive function" and "impact on life" scales were responsive to change. Principal components analysis confirmed the constructs and a unidimensional Rasch Partial Credit Model was subsequently established for each scale. Transformation to an interval scale was achieved. Using the ordinal-to-interval conversion tables, parametric statistical analysis may be used.

CONCLUSION

The study provides support for the Leg Activity measure being valid, reliable and responsive.Implications for rehabilitationThe Leg Activity measure is the only published self-report measure in the current literature that addresses passive and active function as well as impact on quality of life, of the paretic leg in a comprehensive manner.The initial evaluation of Leg Activity measure psychometric properties, in relation to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist and Medical Outcomes Trust Quality Criteria, supports its measurement properties for clinical and research use.The Leg Activity measure as a valid, reliable and responsive tool for the evaluation of treatment in leg spasticity including condition specific (spasticity) quality-of-life.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在根据基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准评估 Leg Activity 测量的特性。

方法

参与者在接受肉毒毒素和物理干预治疗腿部痉挛后,在基线、第 1 天、第 6 周和第 12 周进行评估。

结果

在第 1 阶段,招募了 64 名参与者评估 Leg Activity 测量的初始心理测量特性。在第 2 阶段,招募了 100 名额外的参与者评估定标特性。总共 164 名参与者的样本用于研究。“被动功能”、“主动功能”和“对生活质量的影响”的结构效度得到了支持。量表的克朗巴赫α值分别为 0.86、0.97 和 0.87。项目水平的测试-重测一致性在 91-97%之间(Kappa 值为 0.75-0.95)。痉挛治疗后(n=64),Leg Activity 测量的“被动功能”和“对生活的影响”量表对变化有反应。主成分分析证实了这些结构,随后为每个量表建立了一个单维 Rasch 部分信用模型。实现了向区间量表的转换。使用有序到区间的转换表,可以进行参数统计分析。

结论

该研究为 Leg Activity 测量的有效性、可靠性和反应性提供了支持。

对康复的启示

Leg Activity 测量是目前文献中唯一发表的自我报告测量,全面评估了瘫痪腿的被动和主动功能以及对生活质量的影响。

根据基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准清单和医疗成果信托质量标准,对 Leg Activity 测量心理测量特性的初步评估支持其在临床和研究中的测量特性。

Leg Activity 测量是一种有效的、可靠的、有反应的工具,可用于评估腿部痉挛的治疗效果,包括特定于病情的(痉挛)生活质量。

相似文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of the leg activity measure (LegA) for outcome measurement in people with brain injury and spasticity.脑损伤伴痉挛患者结局测量用腿部活动测量量表(LegA)的心理测量学评估。
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Apr;43(7):976-987. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1643933. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
2
Turkish translation and transcultural validity and reliability of an assessment tool for spasticity: Leg Activity Measure (Leg A).评估痉挛的一种工具:腿部活动测量(Leg A)的土耳其语翻译及跨文化效度和信度。
Neurol Res. 2024 Jul;46(7):644-652. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2024.2340878. Epub 2024 May 2.
3
Initial psychometric evaluation of the Arm Activity Measure (ArmA): a measure of activity in the hemiparetic arm.偏瘫上肢活动测量表(ArmA)的初步心理计量评估:一种偏瘫上肢活动的测量方法。
Clin Rehabil. 2013 Aug;27(8):728-40. doi: 10.1177/0269215512474942. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
4
The Leg Activity measure, a new measure of passive and active function and impact on quality of life; informing goal setting and outcome evaluation in leg spasticity.腿部活动测量,一种新的被动和主动功能及对生活质量影响的测量方法;为腿部痉挛的目标设定和结果评估提供信息。
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Aug;43(16):2366-2374. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1697765. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
5
Conceptualization and Development of the Leg Activity Measure (LegA) for Patient and Carer Reported Assessment of Activity in the Paretic Leg.用于患者和护理人员报告的偏瘫侧下肢活动评估的下肢活动测量法(LegA)的概念化与开发
Physiother Res Int. 2017 Apr;22(2). doi: 10.1002/pri.1660. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
6
A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Action Research Arm Test in neurorehabilitation.对神经康复中行动研究臂测试的心理测量特性的系统评价。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2018 Oct;65(5):449-471. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12527.
7
The cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the MSSS-88 for use in Italian patients with multiple sclerosis.多 sclerosis 患者使用 MSSS-88 的跨文化调适和心理计量学验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Feb;41(4):465-471. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1393699. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
8
Initial psychometric validation of the questionnaire on pain caused by spasticity (QPS).痉挛所致疼痛问卷(QPS)的初步心理测量学验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Nov 28;15(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0804-8.
9
Modified PRISM and SCI-SET Spasticity Measures for Persons With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Results of a Rasch Analyses.改良 PRISM 和 SCI-SET 痉挛评估量表在创伤性脊髓损伤患者中的应用:一项 Rasch 分析结果。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Sep;101(9):1570-1579. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.05.012. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
10
A systematic review protocol to evaluate the psychometric properties of measures of function within adult neuro-rehabilitation.一项评估成人神经康复中功能测量指标心理测量特性的系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 13;4:86. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0076-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Cryoneurolysis: A Novel Treatment for Management of Spasticity. Presentation of a Case Series.冷冻神经溶解术:一种治疗痉挛的新方法。病例系列报告
Adv Rehabil Sci Pract. 2025 Jul 15;14:27536351251340216. doi: 10.1177/27536351251340216. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Meta-Analysis of Goal Setting and Physical Treatment Categorisation for Focal Spasticity Following Stroke or Other Acquired Brain Injury.中风或其他后天性脑损伤后局灶性痉挛的目标设定与物理治疗分类的Meta分析
Adv Rehabil Sci Pract. 2025 Jun 19;14:27536351251343520. doi: 10.1177/27536351251343520. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Clinical presentation of patients with lower limb spasticity undergoing routine treatment with botulinum toxin: baseline findings from an international observational study.
下肢痉挛接受常规肉毒毒素治疗的患者的临床表现:一项国际观察性研究的基线结果。
J Rehabil Med. 2023 Oct 5;55:jrm4257. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v55.4257.