Neurology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Muscle Nerve. 2019 Oct;60(4):433-436. doi: 10.1002/mus.26645. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
The sarcolemmal resting membrane potential (RMP) affects muscle excitability, contractility, and force generation. However, there are limited In vivo data on the normal RMP of the human sarcolemma between muscles. We hypothesize that the in vivo RMP may differ between human muscles with different physiological roles.
Muscle velocity recovery cycles were recorded from a proximal antigravity muscle, the rectus femoris, and compared with paired recordings from a distal non-antigravity muscle, the tibialis anterior, in 34 normal individuals.
Significant differences in muscle relative refractory period (3.55 millseconds vs 3.87 milliseconds, P = .002), early supernormality (14.22% vs 10.50%, P < .0001), and late supernormality (5.43% vs 3.50%, P < .0001) were observed.
The results strongly suggest a less negative RMP in tibialis anterior vs rectus femoris and attest to intermuscle differences in normal excitability and physiology. This novel finding employing an in vivo methodology highlights the need for muscle-specific normative data in future studies.
肌膜静息膜电位(RMP)影响肌肉兴奋性、收缩性和肌力产生。然而,关于人体肌肉之间正常肌膜 RMP 的体内数据有限。我们假设体内 RMP 可能因具有不同生理作用的肌肉而异。
从近端抗重力肌肉股直肌记录肌肉速度恢复周期,并与 34 名正常个体的配对记录进行比较,记录来自远端非抗重力肌肉胫骨前肌的记录。
观察到肌肉相对不应期(3.55 毫秒比 3.87 毫秒,P =.002)、早期超极化(14.22%比 10.50%,P < .0001)和晚期超极化(5.43%比 3.50%,P < .0001)存在显著差异。
结果强烈表明胫骨前肌的 RMP 比股直肌更负,证明正常兴奋性和生理学方面存在肌肉间差异。这项采用体内方法的新发现强调了未来研究中需要肌肉特异性的正常数据。