Suppr超能文献

远程电神经调节(REN)在偏头痛的急性治疗中的应用:与常规护理和急性偏头痛药物的比较。

Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) in the acute treatment of migraine: a comparison with usual care and acute migraine medications.

机构信息

The David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, California, Los Angeles, USA.

Mercy Clinic Neurology & Headache Cente, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

J Headache Pain. 2019 Jul 22;20(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-1033-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a significant unmet need for new, effective and well tolerated acute migraine treatments. A recent study has demonstrated that a novel remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) treatment provides superior clinically meaningful pain relief with a low rate of device-related adverse events. The results reported herein compare the efficacy of REN with current standard of care in the acute treatments of migraine.

METHODS

We performed a post-hoc analysis on a subgroup of participants with migraine from a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, sham-controlled, multicenter study on acute care. The original study included a 2-4 weeks run-in phase, in which migraine attacks were treated according to patient preference (i.e., usual care) and reported in an electronic diary; next, participants entered a double-blind treatment phase in which they treated the attacks with an active or sham device. The efficacy of REN was compared to the efficacy of usual care or pharmacological treatments in the run-in phase in a within-subject design that included participants who treated at least one attack with the active REN device and reported pain intensity at 2 h post-treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 252 patients randomized, there were 99 participants available for analysis. At 2 h post-treatment, pain relief was achieved in 66.7% of the participants using REN versus 52.5% participants with usual care (p < 0.05). Pain relief at 2 h in at least one of two attacks was achieved by 84.4% of participants versus 68.9% in usual care (p < 0.05). REN and usual care were similarly effective for pain-free status at 2 h. The results also demonstrate the non-inferiority of REN compared with acute pharmacological treatments and its non-dependency on preventive medication use.

CONCLUSION

REN is an effective acute treatment for migraine with non-inferior efficacy compared to current acute migraine therapies. Together with a very favorable safety profile, these findings suggest that REN may offer a promising alternative for the acute treatment of migraine and could be considered first line treatment in some patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03361423 . Registered 18 November 2017.

摘要

背景

目前,人们急需新的、有效且耐受性良好的急性偏头痛治疗方法。最近的一项研究表明,一种新型的远程电神经调节(REN)治疗方法在提供卓越的临床意义上的疼痛缓解方面具有较低的设备相关不良事件发生率。本文报告的结果比较了 REN 与当前偏头痛急性治疗标准护理的疗效。

方法

我们对一项随机、双盲、平行组、假对照、多中心急性护理研究中偏头痛亚组参与者进行了事后分析。原始研究包括 2-4 周的预试验阶段,在此期间,偏头痛发作根据患者的偏好(即常规护理)进行治疗,并在电子日记中报告;然后,参与者进入双盲治疗阶段,他们使用活性或假性设备治疗发作。在包括至少一次使用活性 REN 设备治疗并报告治疗后 2 小时疼痛强度的参与者的自身内设计中,将 REN 的疗效与预试验阶段的常规护理或药物治疗的疗效进行了比较。

结果

在随机分配的 252 名患者中,有 99 名患者可进行分析。在治疗后 2 小时,使用 REN 的参与者中有 66.7%缓解疼痛,而使用常规护理的参与者中有 52.5%(p<0.05)。在至少两次发作中的一次发作中,有 84.4%的参与者缓解疼痛,而常规护理中有 68.9%(p<0.05)。在 2 小时时,REN 和常规护理在无疼痛状态方面同样有效。结果还表明,REN 与急性药物治疗相比具有非劣效性,并且不依赖预防性药物的使用。

结论

REN 是一种有效的偏头痛急性治疗方法,与当前的急性偏头痛治疗方法相比具有非劣效性。加上非常有利的安全性概况,这些发现表明 REN 可能为偏头痛的急性治疗提供了一种有前途的替代方法,并可考虑作为某些患者的一线治疗方法。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03361423。注册于 2017 年 11 月 18 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba7/6734294/9fba1190fffd/10194_2019_1033_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验