Masyn Serge, Vuchelen Anneleen, Santermans Eva, Rasschaert Freya, Bangura Allieu, Parys Wim, Rutten Romain
Johnson & Johnson Global Public Health, Beerse, Belgium.
Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340, Beerse, Belgium.
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Jul 22;12(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4485-8.
Biometric identification techniques for pediatric use are limited. This investigation studied iris scanning in minors aged 1-4 in two exploratory studies in Belgium (n = 197) and Sierra Leone (n = 230), and in a subsequent clinical study in Sierra Leone (n = 635). Images of participants' irises were captured using a camera, while a survey assessed the ease of use with children.
The image capture success rate per individual was high; 86.0% of the participants had ≥ 2 successful captures. Iris scan quality and surface were similar in all age groups and in the matching population database. When including feasibility in the analysis of minors aged 3-4, sensitivity and specificity were non-inferior compared to using the biometric of a guardian. However, the quality of iris scanning in minors aged 1-4 was worse than the iris scanning reference quality in adults. A mean total usability score of 1.55 ± 0.27 was calculated; a usability threshold of 1.45 is required for routine use. Overall, this technique is feasible in minors aged 3-4, replacing the use of guardian biometrics. Additional work is ongoing to improve this technique further, striving for uniformity from the age of 1.
适用于儿科的生物识别技术有限。本研究在比利时(n = 197)和塞拉利昂(n = 230)的两项探索性研究以及随后在塞拉利昂进行的一项临床研究(n = 635)中,对1至4岁未成年人的虹膜扫描进行了研究。使用相机采集参与者的虹膜图像,同时通过一项调查评估与儿童使用的便捷性。
个体图像采集成功率很高;86.0%的参与者有≥2次成功采集。所有年龄组以及匹配人群数据库中的虹膜扫描质量和表面情况相似。在对3至4岁未成年人的分析中纳入可行性时,与使用监护人的生物识别技术相比,灵敏度和特异性并不逊色。然而,1至4岁未成年人的虹膜扫描质量比成年人虹膜扫描的参考质量要差。计算得出的总体可用性平均评分为1.55±0.27;常规使用要求的可用性阈值为1.45。总体而言,该技术在3至4岁未成年人中可行,可替代监护人生物识别技术的使用。目前正在开展更多工作以进一步改进该技术,力争从1岁起实现统一。