School of Public Health, Physiotherapy, and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Sports Medicine Center, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jan;54(2):94-101. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100164. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
To determine whether individuals who sustained a sports concussion would exhibit persistent impairments in gait and quiet standing compared to non-injured controls during a dual-task assessment .
Systematic review and meta-analysis using individual participant data (IPD).
The search strategy was applied across seven electronic bibliographic and grey literature databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SportDISCUS, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES and Web of Science, from database inception until June 2017.
Studies were included if; individuals with a sports concussion and non-injured controls were included as participants; a steady-state walking or static postural balance task was used as the primary motor task; dual-task performance was assessed with the addition of a secondary cognitive task; spatiotemporal, kinematic or kinetic outcome variables were reported, and; included studies comprised an observational study design with case-control matching.
Our review is reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analyses-IPD Statement. We implemented the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomised Studies to undertake an outcome-level risk of bias assessment using a domain-based tool. Study-level data were synthesised in one of three tiers depending on the availability and quality of data: (1) homogeneous IPD; (2) heterogeneous IPD and (3) aggregate data for inclusion in a descriptive synthesis. IPD were aggregated using a 'one-stage', random-effects model.
26 studies were included. IPD were available for 20 included studies. Consistently high and unclear risk of bias was identified for selection, detection, attrition, and reporting biases across studies. Individuals with a recent sports concussion walked with slower average walking speed (χ=51.7; df=4; p<0.001; mean difference=0.06 m/s; 95% CI: 0.004 to 0.11) and greater frontal plane centre of mass displacement (χ=10.3; df=4; p=0.036; mean difference -0.0039 m; 95% CI: -0.0075 to -0.0004) than controls when evaluated using a dual-task assessment up to 2 months following concussion.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS: Our IPD evidence synthesis identifies that, when evaluated using a dual-task assessment, individuals who had incurred a sports concussion exhibited impairments in gait that persisted beyond reported standard clinical recovery timelines of 7-10 days. Dual-task assessment (with motion capture) may be a useful clinical assessment to evaluate recovery after sports concussion.
PROTOCOL PRE-REGISTRATION: This systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO CRD42017064861.
在双重任务评估中,确定与未受伤的对照组相比,遭受运动性脑震荡的个体是否在步态和安静站立方面持续存在障碍。
使用个体参与者数据(IPD)的系统评价和荟萃分析。
该搜索策略适用于七个电子书目和灰色文献数据库:MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、SportDISCUS、PsycINFO、PsycARTICLES 和 Web of Science,从数据库建立到 2017 年 6 月。
如果;将有运动性脑震荡和未受伤的对照组的个体纳入参与者;稳态步行或静态姿势平衡任务用作主要运动任务;使用添加次要认知任务来评估双重任务表现;报告时空、运动学或动力学结果变量,并且;纳入的研究包括观察性研究设计,采用病例对照匹配。
我们的综述是按照系统评价和荟萃分析-IPD 报告的首选报告项目进行的。我们使用基于域的工具对非随机研究进行了风险评估工具,以进行基于结果的风险偏倚评估。根据数据的可用性和质量,对研究数据进行综合分析,分为三个层次:(1)同质 IPD;(2)异质 IPD 和(3)汇总数据,用于描述性综合。使用“单阶段”随机效应模型汇总 IPD。
纳入了 26 项研究。20 项纳入研究提供了 IPD。在整个研究中,一致存在选择、检测、流失和报告偏倚的高风险和不明确风险。与对照组相比,在双任务评估中,近期发生运动性脑震荡的个体行走时平均行走速度较慢(χ=51.7;df=4;p<0.001;平均差异=0.06 m/s;95%CI:0.004 至 0.11),额状面质心位移较大(χ=10.3;df=4;p=0.036;平均差异 -0.0039 m;95%CI:-0.0075 至 -0.0004)。
总结/结论:我们的 IPD 证据综合表明,在使用双重任务评估时,发生运动性脑震荡的个体在步态方面存在障碍,这种障碍持续时间超过报告的 7-10 天的标准临床恢复时间。双重任务评估(结合运动捕捉)可能是评估运动性脑震荡后恢复的有用临床评估方法。
本系统评价前瞻性地在 PROSPERO CRD42017064861 中进行了注册。