International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC, USA.
J Nutr. 2019 Nov 1;149(11):2020-2033. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxz158.
Relative prices of healthy/unhealthy foods have been implicated in the obesity epidemic, but never extensively quantified across countries or empirically linked to undernutrition.
This study compared relative caloric prices (RCPs) for different food categories across 176 countries and ascertained their associations with dietary indicators and nutrition outcomes.
We converted prices for 657 standardized food products from the 2011 International Comparison Program into caloric prices using USDA Food Composition tables. We classified products into 21 specific food groups. We constructed RCPs as the ratio of the 3 cheapest products in each food group, relative to the weighted cost of a basket of starchy staples. We analyzed RCP differences across World Bank income levels and regions and used cross-country regressions to explore associations with Demographic Health Survey dietary indicators for women 15-49 y old and children 12-23 mo old and with WHO indicators of the under-5 stunting prevalence and adult overweight prevalence.
Most noncereal foods were relatively cheap in high-income countries, including sugar- and fat-rich foods. In lower-income countries, healthy foods were generally expensive, especially most animal-sourced foods and fortified infant cereals (FICs). Higher RCPs for a food predict lower consumption among children for 7 of 9 food groups. Higher milk and FIC prices were positively associated with international child stunting patterns: a 1-SD increase in milk prices was associated with a 2.8 percentage point increase in the stunting prevalence. Similarly, a 1-SD increase in soft drink prices was associated with a reduction in the overweight prevalence of ∼3.6 percentage points.
Relative food prices vary systematically across countries and partially explain international differences in the prevalences of undernutrition and overweight adults. Future research should focus on how to alter relative prices to achieve better dietary and nutrition outcomes.
健康/不健康食品的相对价格与肥胖流行有关,但从未在国家间进行广泛量化,也没有实证联系到营养不良。
本研究比较了 176 个国家不同食品类别的相对热量价格(RCP),并确定了它们与饮食指标和营养结果的关系。
我们使用美国农业部食品成分表将 2011 年国际比较计划中的 657 种标准食品的价格转换为热量价格。我们将产品分为 21 种特定的食品组。我们将 RCP 构建为每个食品组中 3 种最便宜产品的价格与淀粉主食篮子加权成本的比值。我们分析了世界银行收入水平和地区之间的 RCP 差异,并使用跨国回归探索了 RCP 与妇女(15-49 岁)和儿童(12-23 个月)15-49 岁的人口健康调查饮食指标以及 5 岁以下儿童发育迟缓流行率和成年人超重流行率的关系。
在高收入国家,大多数非谷物食品相对便宜,包括含糖和高脂肪食品。在低收入国家,健康食品通常价格昂贵,尤其是大多数动物源性食品和强化婴儿食品(FICs)。较高的食品 RCP 预示着儿童对 9 种食品组中的 7 种食品的消费减少。较高的牛奶和 FIC 价格与国际儿童发育迟缓模式呈正相关:牛奶价格每增加 1 个标准差,发育迟缓的流行率就会增加 2.8 个百分点。同样,软饮料价格每增加 1 个标准差,超重的流行率就会降低约 3.6 个百分点。
相对食品价格在国家间存在系统差异,部分解释了营养不良和超重成年人的国际差异。未来的研究应重点关注如何改变相对价格以实现更好的饮食和营养结果。