• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种欺骗检测训练方法对老年人有效性的比较。

A comparison of the effectiveness of two types of deceit detection training methods in older adults.

作者信息

Stanley Jennifer Tehan, Webster Britney A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Akron, Akron, OH, 44325-4301, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 Jul 22;4(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41235-019-0178-z.

DOI:10.1186/s41235-019-0178-z
PMID:31332602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6646507/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In general, people are poor at detecting deception. Older adults are even worse than young adults at detecting deceit, which might make them uniquely vulnerable to certain types of financial fraud. One reason for poor deceit detection abilities is that lay theories of cues to deception are not valid. This study compared the effectiveness of two training methods to improve deceit detection among older adults: valid facial cues versus valid verbal cues to deception. Approximately 150 older adults were randomly assigned to facial training, verbal training, or a control condition. Participants completed a pre-test deceit detection task, their assigned training, and a post-test deceit detection task.

RESULTS

Both training groups significantly improved at recognizing their respectively trained cues after training. However, the facial cue training group were less accurate at detecting deception post-test compared to pre-test and the control group exhibited improved accuracy of deceit detection from pre-test to post-test.

CONCLUSIONS

These results are consistent with the body of literature on deception suggesting people hover around chance accuracy, even after training. Older adults' facial and verbal cue recognition can be improved with training, but these improvements did not translate into more accurate deceit detection, and actually hampered performance in the facial condition. Older adults showed the most benefit from sheer practice at detecting deception (in the control condition), perhaps because this condition encouraged implicit rather than explicit judgments of deception.

摘要

背景

一般来说,人们在察觉欺骗方面能力欠佳。老年人在察觉欺骗方面比年轻人更差,这可能使他们特别容易受到某些类型的金融欺诈。欺骗察觉能力差的一个原因是,关于欺骗线索的外行理论是无效的。本研究比较了两种训练方法在提高老年人欺骗察觉能力方面的有效性:有效的面部线索与有效的言语线索。大约150名老年人被随机分配到面部训练组、言语训练组或对照组。参与者完成了一项欺骗察觉预测试任务、他们被分配的训练以及一项欺骗察觉后测试任务。

结果

两个训练组在训练后识别各自训练的线索方面都有显著提高。然而,面部线索训练组在测试后的欺骗察觉准确性低于测试前,而对照组在从测试前到测试后的欺骗察觉准确性有所提高。

结论

这些结果与关于欺骗的文献一致,表明即使经过训练,人们的准确性也只是接近随机水平。通过训练可以提高老年人对面部和言语线索的识别能力,但这些提高并没有转化为更准确的欺骗察觉,实际上还妨碍了面部条件下的表现。老年人从单纯的欺骗察觉练习(在对照组中)中受益最大,可能是因为这种条件鼓励对欺骗进行隐性而非显性的判断。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cdb/6646507/37c4d505dd44/41235_2019_178_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cdb/6646507/66d266e908a1/41235_2019_178_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cdb/6646507/37c4d505dd44/41235_2019_178_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cdb/6646507/66d266e908a1/41235_2019_178_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cdb/6646507/37c4d505dd44/41235_2019_178_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparison of the effectiveness of two types of deceit detection training methods in older adults.两种欺骗检测训练方法对老年人有效性的比较。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 Jul 22;4(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41235-019-0178-z.
2
Challenges older adults face in detecting deceit: the role of emotion recognition.老年人在识别欺骗时面临的挑战:情绪识别的作用。
Psychol Aging. 2008 Mar;23(1):24-32. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.23.1.24.
3
Interoceptive Accuracy Enhances Deception Detection in Older Adults.内感受准确性提高老年人的欺骗检测能力。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Nov 1;79(11). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae151.
4
Truth, lies, and videotape: an investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception.真相、谎言与录像带:对联邦假释官识破欺骗能力的一项调查。
Law Hum Behav. 2000 Dec;24(6):643-58. doi: 10.1023/a:1005500219657.
5
Veracity judgement, not accuracy: Reconsidering the role of facial expressions, empathy, and emotion recognition training on deception detection.真实性判断,而非准确性:重新审视面部表情、同理心和情绪识别训练在欺骗检测中的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 May;74(5):910-927. doi: 10.1177/1747021820978851. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
6
Detecting deception in facial expressions of pain: accuracy and training.检测疼痛面部表情中的欺骗行为:准确性与训练
Clin J Pain. 2004 Nov-Dec;20(6):415-22. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200411000-00006.
7
The Limits of Conscious Deception Detection: When Reliance on False Deception Cues Contributes to Inaccurate Judgments.有意识的欺骗检测的局限性:当对虚假欺骗线索的依赖导致判断不准确时。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 19;11:1331. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01331. eCollection 2020.
8
How researchers can make verbal lie detection more attractive for practitioners.研究人员如何能让言语测谎对从业者更具吸引力。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2022 Mar 22;30(3):383-396. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2022.2035842. eCollection 2023.
9
Emotional intelligence and mismatching expressive and verbal messages: a contribution to detection of deception.情商与表达性信息和言语信息的不匹配:对欺骗检测的贡献。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 21;9(3):e92570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092570. eCollection 2014.
10
A sheep in wolf's clothing: levels of deceit and detection in the evolution of cue-mimicry.披着羊皮的狼:在拟态进化中欺骗和检测的程度。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Sep 11;286(1910):20191425. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1425. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring the Candidates' Emotions in Political Debates Based on Facial Expression Recognition Techniques.基于面部表情识别技术测量政治辩论中候选人的情绪。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 9;13:785453. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.785453. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Latent Class Analysis to Identify Profiles of Elder Abuse Perpetrators.运用潜在类别分析鉴定虐待老人行为施害者的类型。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018 Jun 14;73(5):e49-e58. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx023.
2
Does aging impair first impression accuracy? Differentiating emotion recognition from complex social inferences.衰老会损害第一印象的准确性吗?区分情绪识别与复杂的社会推理。
Psychol Aging. 2014 Sep;29(3):482-90. doi: 10.1037/a0037146.
3
Some evidence for unconscious lie detection.无意识谎言检测的一些证据。
Psychol Sci. 2014 May 1;25(5):1098-105. doi: 10.1177/0956797614524421. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
4
Exploring own-age biases in deception detection.探究欺骗检测中的同年龄偏见。
Cogn Emot. 2014 Apr;28(3):493-506. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.839438. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
5
A meta-analytic review of age differences in theory of mind.元分析综述心智理论的年龄差异。
Psychol Aging. 2013 Sep;28(3):826-39. doi: 10.1037/a0030677. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
6
Cry me a river: identifying the behavioral consequences of extremely high-stakes interpersonal deception.痛哭流涕:识别高风险人际欺骗的行为后果。
Law Hum Behav. 2012 Dec;36(6):469-477. doi: 10.1037/h0093929. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
7
Bringing an Ecological Perspective to the Study of Aging and Recognition of Emotional Facial Expressions: Past, Current, and Future Methods.将生态视角引入衰老研究及面部表情情绪识别:过去、当前及未来的方法
J Nonverbal Behav. 2011 Dec 1;35(4):261-278. doi: 10.1007/s10919-011-0113-6.
8
Investigating the "deceiver stereotype": do older adults associate averted gaze with deception?探究“欺骗者刻板印象”:老年人是否会将回避的目光与欺骗联系起来?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012 Mar;67(2):178-83. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr087. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
9
Age-related differences in deception.与年龄相关的欺骗差异。
Psychol Aging. 2012 Sep;27(3):543-9. doi: 10.1037/a0023380. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
10
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.使用 G*Power 3.1 进行统计功效分析:相关和回归分析的检验。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.