Endicott College and H.O.P.E. Consulting, LLC.
University of Southern California and FirstSteps for Kids.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jan;53(1):10-24. doi: 10.1002/jaba.611. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
According to traditional linguistic accounts language, and its generative nature, cannot be taught. From a behavior analytic perspective, language is like any other behavior; it is learned and amenable to change. Based upon Skinner's radical behavioral analysis of verbal behavior, specific procedures have been designed to promote novel verbal relations. However, despite the strength and utility of this approach, using behavioral principles to understand the generativity of language has been challenging. Dependent upon the specific theory (e.g., stimulus equivalence, relational frame theory, bidirectional naming) within the radical behavioral orientation, researchers arrange unique procedures to evaluate the variables responsible for this phenomenon. This paper presents the commonalities and differences of two procedures (i.e., multiple exemplar training, multiple exemplar instruction) with examples of research highlighting the use of both in producing generativity. Further, it describes how multiple exemplar instruction is independent from other procedures leading to this outcome, and concludes by providing recommendations for both research and practice.
根据传统语言学的观点,语言及其生成性是无法教授的。而从行为分析的角度来看,语言就像其他行为一样,是可以习得并发生变化的。基于斯金纳对言语行为的彻底行为分析,已经设计出了特定的程序来促进新的言语关系。然而,尽管这种方法具有强大的作用和实用性,但是用行为原理来理解语言的生成性一直具有挑战性。在激进的行为取向中,取决于特定的理论(例如,刺激等价物、关系框架理论、双向命名),研究人员会安排独特的程序来评估负责这种现象的变量。本文介绍了两种程序(即多重范例训练、多重范例指导)的异同,并举例说明了这两种程序在产生生成性方面的应用。此外,它还描述了多重范例指导如何独立于其他导致这一结果的程序,并对研究和实践提出了建议。