Suppr超能文献

基于呼吸门控k空间分段扰相梯度回波(SGRE)和回波平面成像(EPI)的4D流磁共振成像的数据质量与最佳背景校正顺序

Data Quality and Optimal Background Correction Order of Respiratory-Gated k-Space Segmented Spoiled Gradient Echo (SGRE) and Echo Planar Imaging (EPI)-Based 4D Flow MRI.

作者信息

Viola Federica, Dyverfeldt Petter, Carlhäll Carl-Johan, Ebbers Tino

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Mar;51(3):885-896. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26879. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A reduction in scan time of 4D Flow MRI would facilitate clinical application. A recent study indicates that echo-planar imaging (EPI) 4D Flow MRI allows for a reduction in scan time and better data quality than the recommended k-space segmented spoiled gradient echo (SGRE) sequence. It was argued that the poor data quality of SGRE was related to the nonrecommended absence of respiratory motion compensation. However, data quality can also be affected by the background offset compensation.

PURPOSE

To compare the data quality of respiratory motion-compensated SGRE and EPI 4D Flow MRI and their dependence on background correction (BC) order.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS

Eighteen healthy subjects (eight female, mean age 32 ± 5 years).

FIELD STRENGTH AND SEQUENCE

1.5 T. [Correction added on July 26, 2019, after first online publication: The preceding field strength was corrected.] SGRE and EPI-based 4D Flow MRI.

ASSESSMENT

Data quality was investigated visually and by comparing flows through the cardiac valves and aorta. Measurements were obtained from transvalvular flow and pathline analysis.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis were used. Wilcoxon test was used for comparison of visual scoring. Student's t-test was used for comparison of flow volumes.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found by visual inspection (P = 0.08). Left ventricular (LV) flows were strongly and very strongly associated with SGRE and EPI, respectively (R = 0.86-0.94 SGRE; 0.71-0.79 EPI, BC0-4). LV and right ventricular (RV) outflows and LV pathline flows were very strongly associated (R = 0.93-0.95 SGRE; 0.88-0.91 EPI, R = 0.91-0.95 SGRE; 0.91-0.93 EPI, BC1-4). EPI LV outflow was lower than the short-axis-based stroke volume. EPI RV outflow and proximal descending aortic flow were lower than SGREs.

DATA CONCLUSION

Both sequences yielded good internal data consistency when an adequate background correction was applied. Second and first BC order were considered sufficient for transvalvular flow analysis in SGRE and EPI, respectively. Higher BC orders were preferred for particle tracing. Level of Evidence 4 Technical Efficacy Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:885-896.

摘要

背景

减少四维流磁共振成像(4D Flow MRI)的扫描时间将有助于其临床应用。最近的一项研究表明,与推荐的k空间分段扰相梯度回波(SGRE)序列相比,回波平面成像(EPI)4D Flow MRI能够减少扫描时间并获得更好的数据质量。有人认为,SGRE数据质量较差与未推荐的缺乏呼吸运动补偿有关。然而,数据质量也可能受到背景偏移补偿的影响。

目的

比较呼吸运动补偿的SGRE和EPI 4D Flow MRI的数据质量及其对背景校正(BC)阶数的依赖性。

研究类型

回顾性研究。

研究对象

18名健康受试者(8名女性,平均年龄32±5岁)。

场强与序列

1.5T。[2019年7月26日首次在线发表后添加的校正:先前的场强已校正。]基于SGRE和EPI的4D Flow MRI。

评估

通过视觉检查以及比较通过心脏瓣膜和主动脉的血流来研究数据质量。测量通过跨瓣膜血流和迹线分析获得。

统计检验

采用线性回归和Bland-Altman分析。采用Wilcoxon检验比较视觉评分。采用学生t检验比较血流量。

结果

视觉检查未发现显著差异(P = 0.08)。左心室(LV)血流分别与SGRE和EPI有强和非常强的相关性(SGRE的R = 0.86 - 0.94;EPI的R = 0.71 - 0.79,BC0 - 4)。左心室和右心室(RV)流出道以及左心室迹线血流有非常强的相关性(SGRE的R = 0.93 - 0.95;EPI的R = 0.88 - 0.91,SGRE的R = 0.91 - 0.95;EPI的R = 0.91 - 0.93,BC1 - 4)。EPI左心室流出量低于基于短轴的每搏输出量。EPI右心室流出量和近端降主动脉血流低于SGRE。

数据结论

当应用适当的背景校正时,两种序列均产生了良好的内部数据一致性。分别认为第二和第一BC阶数足以用于SGRE和EPI中的跨瓣膜血流分析。对于粒子追踪,较高的BC阶数更可取。证据水平4 技术效能1期 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:885 - 896。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76ea/7027768/fa6db4b62429/JMRI-51-885-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验