Suppr超能文献

波兰毒液过敏治疗实践与指南的比较:国家审计的下一版

Venom allergy treatment practices in Poland in comparison to guidelines: next edition of the national audit.

作者信息

Cichocka-Jarosz Ewa, Stobiecki Marcin, Nittner-Marszalska Marita, Jedynak-Wąsowicz Urszula, Brzyski Piotr

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Department of Clinical and Environmental Allergology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

出版信息

Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2019 Jun;36(3):346-353. doi: 10.5114/ada.2019.85642. Epub 2019 Jun 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Venom immunotherapy treatment (VIT) is the only causal treatment of hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis, which aims to provide long-lasting immunoprotection against severe reactions to subsequent stings.

AIM

To reassess the compliance of VIT procedures in the Polish allergy centres with the European guidelines.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A structured questionnaire survey conducted in all 33 VIT-centres. The response rate was 94%.

RESULTS

The ultrarush initial protocol was the most common protocol (71%, = 22), usually lasting for 3.5 h (50%, = 7). The most frequent (36%, = 11) time interval from the initial to the first maintenance dose (MD) was 14 days, ranging from 7 to 35 days. All centres used an MD of 100 μg. The most frequent time interval between subsequent MDs was 4 weeks (58%, = 18). Five years' of VIT was declared by 71% ( = 22). Before the termination of treatment, more than half of the centres (58%, = 18) performed sIgE and almost half (42%, = 13) performed skin tests. To confirm VIT efficacy, few centres (26%, = 8) conducted the sting challenge. About half of centres provided the patients with an adrenalin auto-injector both at the time of initial diagnostics and at the end of treatment. More than half (55%, = 17) used antihistamines in all patients. Almost half (45%, = 14) declared to stop treatment with β-blockers and almost one fourth (23%, = 7) discontinued angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

In the most important procedures, there is a very high compliance with the guidelines. In the areas where the guidelines are not precise, we observed a large spread of results.

摘要

引言

毒液免疫疗法(VIT)是膜翅目毒液过敏反应的唯一病因治疗方法,旨在提供针对后续蜇伤严重反应的持久免疫保护。

目的

重新评估波兰过敏中心的VIT程序对欧洲指南的依从性。

材料与方法

对所有33个VIT中心进行结构化问卷调查。回复率为94%。

结果

超快速初始方案是最常见的方案(71%,n = 22),通常持续3.5小时(50%,n = 7)。从初始剂量到首次维持剂量(MD)的最常见时间间隔(36%,n = 11)为14天,范围为7至35天。所有中心使用的MD剂量为100μg。后续MD之间最常见的时间间隔为4周(58%,n = 18)。71%(n = 22)的中心宣称进行了5年的VIT治疗。在治疗结束前,超过一半的中心(58%,n = 18)进行了特异性IgE检测,近一半(42%,n = 13)进行了皮肤试验。为确认VIT疗效,很少有中心(26%,n = 8)进行蜇刺激发试验。约一半的中心在初始诊断时和治疗结束时都为患者提供了肾上腺素自动注射器。超过一半(55%,n = 17)的中心对所有患者使用了抗组胺药。近一半(45%,n = 14)的中心宣称停止使用β受体阻滞剂治疗,近四分之一(23%,n = 7)的中心停用了血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂。

结论

在最重要的程序中,对指南的依从性非常高。在指南不明确的领域,我们观察到结果差异很大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c5/6640023/f3d11743ea56/PDIA-36-85642-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验