• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相同还是不同?模糊语言频率表达的区分能力阈值确定及类别形成

Different or the Same? Determination of Discriminatory Power Threshold and Category Formation for Vague Linguistic Frequency Expressions.

作者信息

Bocklisch Franziska

机构信息

Cognitive and Engineering Psychology, Department of Psychology, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 3;10:1559. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01559. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01559
PMID:31333555
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6616075/
Abstract

In psychological research, many questionnaires use verbal response scales with vague linguistic terms (e.g., frequency expressions). The words' meanings can be formalized and evaluated using fuzzy membership functions (MFs), which allow constructing distinct and equidistant response scales. The discriminatory power value of MFs indicates how distinct the functions and, hence, the verbal expressions are. The present manuscript interrogates the threshold of discriminatory power necessary to indicate a sufficient difference in meaning. Using an empirical validation procedure, participants ( = 133) estimated (1) three correspondence values for verbal expressions to determine MFs, and (2) similarities of words by pairwise comparison ratings. Results show a non-linear relationship between discriminatory power and similarity, and fuzzy MFs, as well as the searched-for threshold value for discriminatory power. Implications for the selection of verbal expressions and the construction of verbal categories in questionnaire response scales are discussed.

摘要

在心理学研究中,许多问卷使用带有模糊语言术语(如频率表达)的言语反应量表。这些词的含义可以通过模糊隶属函数(MFs)进行形式化和评估,模糊隶属函数允许构建不同且等距的反应量表。MFs的辨别力值表明这些函数以及言语表达的差异程度。本手稿探讨了表明意义上有足够差异所需的辨别力阈值。通过实证验证程序,参与者(n = 133)估计:(1)言语表达的三个对应值以确定MFs,以及(2)通过成对比较评分来估计词语的相似度。结果显示了辨别力与相似度、模糊MFs以及所寻求的辨别力阈值之间的非线性关系。讨论了问卷反应量表中言语表达的选择和言语类别的构建所涉及的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26bc/6616075/792235075951/fpsyg-10-01559-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26bc/6616075/792235075951/fpsyg-10-01559-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26bc/6616075/792235075951/fpsyg-10-01559-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Different or the Same? Determination of Discriminatory Power Threshold and Category Formation for Vague Linguistic Frequency Expressions.相同还是不同?模糊语言频率表达的区分能力阈值确定及类别形成
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 3;10:1559. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01559. eCollection 2019.
2
Sometimes, often, and always: exploring the vague meanings of frequency expressions.有时、经常、总是:探究频率表达的模糊意义。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Mar;44(1):144-57. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0130-8.
3
Quantitative meanings of verbal probability expressions.
J Appl Psychol. 1989 Jun;74(3):433-42. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.3.433.
4
Verbal probabilities: Very likely to be somewhat more confusing than numbers.口头概率:比数字更有可能让人感到有些困惑。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 17;14(4):e0213522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213522. eCollection 2019.
5
The effect of order of presentation of verbal probability expressions on numerical estimates in a medical context.在医学背景下,言语概率表述呈现顺序对数值估计的影响。
Psychol Health Med. 2003 Nov;8(4):391-8. doi: 10.1080/1354850310001604522.
6
A collective decision model involving vague concepts and linguistic expressions.一种涉及模糊概念和语言表达的集体决策模型。
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2008 Apr;38(2):421-8. doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2007.913125.
7
Uncertainty of data, fuzzy membership functions, and multilayer perceptrons.数据的不确定性、模糊隶属函数和多层感知器。
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2005 Jan;16(1):10-23. doi: 10.1109/TNN.2004.836200.
8
Directional verbal probabilities: inconsistencies between preferential judgments and numerical meanings.方向性言语概率:偏好判断与数字含义之间的不一致
Exp Psychol. 2006;53(3):161-70. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.53.3.161.
9
Performance evaluation of fuzzy classifier systems for multidimensional pattern classification problems.用于多维模式分类问题的模糊分类器系统的性能评估。
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 1999;29(5):601-18. doi: 10.1109/3477.790443.
10
Design Features for Linguistically-Mediated Meaning Construction: The Relative Roles of the Linguistic and Conceptual Systems in Subserving the Ideational Function of Language.语言介导意义构建的设计特征:语言系统和概念系统在服务语言概念功能中的相对作用
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 19;7:156. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00156. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Where words meet numbers: Comprehension of measurement unit terms in posterior cortical atrophy.文字与数字的相遇:在后皮质萎缩症中对度量单位术语的理解。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Aug;131:216-222. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 13.
2
Diagnostic causal reasoning with verbal information.基于言语信息的诊断因果推理
Cogn Psychol. 2017 Aug;96:54-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
3
Using a Mixed IRT Model to Assess the Scale Usage in the Measurement of Job Satisfaction.使用混合IRT模型评估工作满意度测量中的量表使用情况。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 4;7:1998. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01998. eCollection 2016.
4
Improbable outcomes: infrequent or extraordinary?不大可能的结果:罕见还是异常?
Cognition. 2013 Apr;127(1):119-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
5
Sometimes, often, and always: exploring the vague meanings of frequency expressions.有时、经常、总是:探究频率表达的模糊意义。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Mar;44(1):144-57. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0130-8.
6
Interpersonal comparison of subjective probabilities: toward translating linguistic probabilities.主观概率的人际比较:迈向语言概率的转换
Mem Cognit. 2005 Sep;33(6):1057-68. doi: 10.3758/bf03193213.