Achard Caroline Stéphanie, Dupouy Véronique, Siviglia Suzanne, Arpaillange Nathalie, Cauquil Laurent, Bousquet-Mélou Alain, Zemb Olivier
GenPhySE, INRA, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Lallemand SAS, Blagnac, France.
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jul 2;10:1503. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01503. eCollection 2019.
Reducing antibiotic use is a necessary step toward less antibiotic resistance in livestock, but many antibiotic resistance genes can persist for years, even in an antibiotic-free environment. In this study, we investigated the potential of three fecal complex microbial communities from antibiotic-naive does to drive the microbiota of kits from antibiotic-exposed dams and outcompete bacteria-carrying antibiotic-resistant genes. The fecal complex microbial communities were either orally delivered or simply added as fresh fecal pellets in four to five nests that were kept clean from maternal feces. Additionally, four nests were cleaned for the maternal feces and five nests were handled according to the common farm practice (i.e., cleaning once a week) as controls. At weaning, we measured the relative abundance of 26 antibiotic resistance genes, the proportion of resistant to tetracycline and sulfonamide antibiotics, and the taxonomic composition of the microbiota by sequencing the 16S rRNA genes of one kit per nest. Changing the surrounding microbes of the kits can hinder the transmission of antibiotic resistance genes from one generation to the next, but the three communities widely differed in their ability to orient gut microbes and in their impact on antibiotic resistance genes. The most efficient delivery of the microbial community reduced the proportion of resistant from 93 to 9%, decreased the relative abundance of eight antibiotic resistance genes, and changed the gut microbes of the kits at weaning. The least efficient did not reduce any ARG or modify the bacterial community. In addition, adding fecal pellets was more efficient than the oral inoculation of the anaerobic suspension derived from these fecal pellets. However, we were unable to predict the outcome of the exclusion from the data of the donor does (species composition and abundance of antibiotic resistance genes). In conclusion, we revealed major differences between microbial communities regarding their ability to exclude antibiotic resistance genes, but more work is needed to understand the components leading to the successful exclusion of antibiotic resistance genes from the gut. As a consequence, studies about the impact of competitive exclusion should use several microbial communities in order to draw general conclusions.
减少抗生素使用是降低家畜抗生素耐药性的必要步骤,但许多抗生素耐药基因可能会持续数年,即使在无抗生素环境中也是如此。在本研究中,我们调查了来自未接触过抗生素的母羊的三种粪便复杂微生物群落,驱动来自接触过抗生素的母羊的幼崽的微生物群,并胜过携带抗生素耐药基因的细菌的潜力。粪便复杂微生物群落要么通过口服给药,要么简单地作为新鲜粪便颗粒添加到四到五个保持清洁、无母体粪便的巢穴中。此外,四个巢穴清理了母体粪便,五个巢穴按照农场常规做法(即每周清理一次)处理作为对照。在断奶时,我们通过对每个巢穴中的一只幼崽的16S rRNA基因进行测序,测量了26种抗生素耐药基因的相对丰度、对四环素和磺胺类抗生素耐药的比例以及微生物群的分类组成。改变幼崽周围的微生物可以阻碍抗生素耐药基因从一代向下一代的传播,但这三个群落引导肠道微生物的能力及其对抗生素耐药基因的影响差异很大。微生物群落最有效的传递方式将耐药菌的比例从93%降至9%,降低了8种抗生素耐药基因的相对丰度,并在断奶时改变了幼崽的肠道微生物。效率最低的传递方式没有减少任何抗生素耐药基因,也没有改变细菌群落。此外,添加粪便颗粒比口服源自这些粪便颗粒的厌氧悬浮液更有效。然而,我们无法从供体母羊的数据(物种组成和抗生素耐药基因丰度)中预测排除结果。总之,我们揭示了微生物群落在排除抗生素耐药基因能力方面的主要差异,但需要更多的研究来了解导致成功从肠道中排除抗生素耐药基因的成分。因此,关于竞争性排除影响的研究应该使用几种微生物群落,以便得出一般性结论。