Frank-Ito Dennis O, Carpenter David J, Cheng Tracy, Avashia Yash J, Brown David A, Glener Adam, Allori Alexander, Marcus Jeffrey R
Division of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C.
Computational Biology and Bioinformatics PhD Program, Duke University, Durham, N.C.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 May 16;7(5):e2244. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002244. eCollection 2019 May.
Nasal airway obstruction (NAO) due to nasal anatomic deformities is known to be more common among cleft patients than the general population, yet information is lacking regarding severity and variability of cleft-associated nasal obstruction relative to other conditions causing NAO. This preliminary study compares differences in NAO experienced by unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity (uCLND) subjects with noncleft subjects experiencing NAO.
Computational modeling techniques based on patient-specific computed tomography images were used to quantify the nasal airway anatomy and airflow dynamics in 21 subjects: 5 healthy normal subjects; 8 noncleft NAO subjects; and 8 uCLND subjects. Outcomes reported include Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores, cross-sectional area, and nasal resistance.
uCLND subjects had significantly larger cross-sectional area differences between the left and right nasal cavities at multiple cross sections compared with normal and NAO subjects. Median and interquartile range (IQR) NOSE scores between NAO and uCLND were 75 (IQR = 22.5) and 67.5 (IQR = 30), respectively. Airflow partition difference between both cavities were: median = 9.4%, IQR = 10.9% (normal); median = 31.9%, IQR = 25.0% (NAO); and median = 29.9%, IQR = 44.1% (uCLND). Median nasal resistance difference between left and right nasal cavities were 0.01 pa.s/ml (IQR = 0.03 pa.s/ml) for normal, 0.09 pa.s/ml (IQR = 0.16 pa.s/ml) for NAO and 0.08 pa.s/ml (IQR = 0.25 pa.s/ml) for uCLND subjects.
uCLND subjects demonstrated significant asymmetry between both sides of the nasal cavity. Furthermore, there exists substantial disproportionality in flow partition difference and resistance difference between cleft and noncleft sides among uCLND subjects, suggesting that both sides may be dysfunctional.
因鼻解剖畸形导致的鼻气道阻塞(NAO)在腭裂患者中比普通人群更为常见,但相对于其他导致NAO的情况,关于腭裂相关鼻阻塞的严重程度和变异性的信息却很缺乏。这项初步研究比较了单侧唇裂鼻畸形(uCLND)受试者与患有NAO的非腭裂受试者在NAO方面的差异。
基于患者特异性计算机断层扫描图像的计算建模技术被用于量化21名受试者的鼻气道解剖结构和气流动力学:5名健康正常受试者;8名非腭裂NAO受试者;以及8名uCLND受试者。报告的结果包括鼻阻塞症状评估(NOSE)评分、横截面积和鼻阻力。
与正常受试者和NAO受试者相比,uCLND受试者在多个横截面上左右鼻腔之间的横截面积差异显著更大。NAO受试者和uCLND受试者的NOSE评分中位数和四分位间距(IQR)分别为75(IQR = 22.5)和67.5(IQR = 30)。两个鼻腔之间的气流分配差异为:中位数 = 9.4%,IQR = 10.9%(正常);中位数 = 31.9%,IQR = 25.0%(NAO);中位数 = 29.9%,IQR = 44.1%(uCLND)。正常受试者左右鼻腔之间的鼻阻力差异中位数为0.01pa.s/ml(IQR = 0.03pa.s/ml),NAO受试者为0.09pa.s/ml(IQR = 0.16pa.s/ml),uCLND受试者为0.08pa.s/ml(IQR = 0.25pa.s/ml)。
uCLND受试者鼻腔两侧表现出显著的不对称性。此外,uCLND受试者腭裂侧与非腭裂侧在气流分配差异和阻力差异方面存在很大的不均衡性,这表明两侧可能都存在功能障碍。