Denny Sarah, Gittelman Mike, Southworth Hayley, Anzeljc Samantha, Arnold Melissa Wervey
1Division of Emergency Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, 43205 USA.
American Academy of Pediatrics, Ohio Chapter, Columbus, 43235 USA.
Inj Epidemiol. 2019 May 29;6(Suppl 1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40621-019-0206-y. eCollection 2019.
Standardized screening tools used by pediatric providers can help determine a child's injury and social risks. This study determined if an office-based quality improvement program could increase targeted anticipatory guidance and community resource distribution to families.
Practices recruited from the Ohio Chapter, American Academy of Pediatrics' database self-selected to participate in a quality improvement project. Two age-appropriate screening tools, corresponding talking points and local resources for birth-1 year and 1-5 year aged children were developed for unintentional injury and social health determinant topics. After a one-day learning session, practice teams implemented the tools into well-child care visits for children < 5 years of age. Two months of retrospective baseline data was collected for each participating clinician. During the 6-month collaborative, physicians randomly reviewed 5 screening tools monthly for each age category to identify injury and social risk discussions and to determine if resources were provided. Frequencies of counseling and resource distribution were calculated. Participating providers received Maintenance of Certification IV credit.
Ten practices (18 providers) participated and 667 tools ( = 313, birth-1 year, = 354, 1-5 year) were collected. For birth-1 year, the most common risky behaviors were related to unintentional injuries: no CPR training 164(52%), car seat not checked 149(48%) and home furniture not secured 117 (37%). For 1-5 year screens, unintentional injuries were also most common: no CPR training 222(63%), car seat not checked 203(57%) and access to choking hazards 198(56%). Families practiced riskier behaviors for unintentional injuries compared to social risks for both age groups (birth - 1 year, social 189/4801 (4%) vs. unintentional injury questions 999/6260 (16%) and 1-5 years, social 271/5451 (5%) vs unintentional injury questions 1140/6372 (18%). From baseline, discussions increased from 31% to 83% for birth - 1 year and 24% to 86% for 1-5 year families. Resource distribution increased by 63% for birth-1 year and 69% for 1-5 year families by pilot conclusion.
Using standardized screening tools in an office setting shows that families often practice unintentional injury risks more than having social concerns. After screening, appropriate resources can be provided to families to encourage behavior change.
儿科医疗服务提供者使用的标准化筛查工具有助于确定儿童的受伤风险和社会风险。本研究旨在确定一个基于门诊的质量改进项目是否可以增加针对家庭的有针对性的预期指导和社区资源分配。
从美国儿科学会俄亥俄分会数据库中招募的医疗机构自行选择参与一项质量改进项目。针对意外伤害和社会健康决定因素主题,为1岁及以下和1 - 5岁儿童开发了两种适合年龄的筛查工具、相应的谈话要点和当地资源。在为期一天的学习课程后,实践团队将这些工具应用于5岁以下儿童的健康体检。为每位参与的临床医生收集两个月的回顾性基线数据。在为期6个月的合作期间,医生每月随机审查每个年龄组的5份筛查工具,以确定是否进行了伤害和社会风险讨论,并确定是否提供了资源。计算咨询和资源分配的频率。参与的医疗服务提供者获得了继续医学教育IV类学分。
10家医疗机构(18名医疗服务提供者)参与了研究,共收集了667份筛查工具(1岁及以下组 = 313份,1 - 5岁组 = 354份)。对于1岁及以下儿童,最常见的危险行为与意外伤害有关:未接受心肺复苏培训164例(52%)、未检查汽车安全座椅149例(48%)以及未固定家中家具117例(37%)。对于1 - 5岁儿童的筛查,意外伤害也是最常见的:未接受心肺复苏培训222例(63%)、未检查汽车安全座椅203例(57%)以及接触窒息危险物品198例(56%)。与两个年龄组的社会风险相比,家庭在意外伤害方面表现出更危险的行为(1岁及以下组,社会风险189/4801(4%) vs. 意外伤害问题999/6260(16%);1 - 5岁组,社会风险271/5451(5%) vs. 意外伤害问题1140/6372(18%))。从基线水平来看,1岁及以下组的讨论从31%增加到83%,1 - 5岁组家庭从24%增加到86%。到试点结束时,1岁及以下组的资源分配增加了63%,1 - 5岁组家庭增加了69%。
在门诊环境中使用标准化筛查工具表明,家庭在意外伤害风险方面的行为往往比社会问题更为常见。筛查后,可以向家庭提供适当的资源以鼓励行为改变。