Al-Thani Hassan, Jabbour Gaby, El-Menyar Ayman, Wahlen Bianca M, Asim Mohammad, Abdelrahman Husham, Nabir Syed, Al-Jogol Hisham, Mahmood Ismail, El-Faramawy Ahmed, Parchani Ashok, Afifi Ibrahim, Peralta Ruben
Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
Department of Surgery, Clinical Research, Trauma and Vascular Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2019 Apr-Jun;9(2):75-81. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_67_18.
We aimed to assess the pattern and impact of sternal injury with rib fracture in a Level 1 trauma center.
We conducted a retrospective review of trauma registry data to identify patients who presented with sternal fracture between 2010 and 2017. Data were analyzed and compared in patients with and without rib fracture.
We identified 212 patients with traumatic sternal injury, of them 119 (56%) had associated rib fractures. In comparison to those who had no rib fracture, patients with rib fractures were older (40.1 ± 13.6 vs. 37.8 ± 14.5), were frequently involved in traffic accidents (75% vs. 71%), had higher chest abbreviated injury scale (AIS 2.8 ± 0.6 vs. 2.2 ± 0.5) and Injury Severity Score ( ISS 17.5 ± 8.6 vs. 13.3 ± 9.6), were more likely to be intubated (33% vs. 19%), required chest tube insertion (13.4% vs. 4.3%), and received blood transfusion (29% vs. 17%). Rates of spine fracture, head injury, and solid organ injury were comparable in the two groups. Manubrium, clavicular and scapular fractures, lung contusion, hemothorax, and pneumothorax were significantly more evident in those who had rib fractures. Hospital length of stay was prolonged in patients with rib fractures ( = 0.008). The overall mortality was higher but not statistically significant in patients with rib fractures (5.0% vs. 3.2%).
Sternal fractures are rare, and detection of associated injuries requires a high index of suspicion. Combined sternal and rib fractures are more evident in relatively older patients after chest trauma. This combination has certain clinical implications that necessitate further prospective studies.
我们旨在评估一级创伤中心胸骨损伤合并肋骨骨折的模式及影响。
我们对创伤登记数据进行了回顾性分析,以确定2010年至2017年间出现胸骨骨折的患者。对有肋骨骨折和无肋骨骨折的患者数据进行了分析和比较。
我们确定了212例创伤性胸骨损伤患者,其中119例(56%)合并肋骨骨折。与无肋骨骨折的患者相比,有肋骨骨折的患者年龄更大(40.1±13.6岁对37.8±14.5岁),经常发生交通事故(75%对71%),胸部简明损伤定级(AIS)更高(2.8±0.6对2.2±0.5),损伤严重度评分(ISS)更高(17.5±8.6对13.3±9.6),更有可能接受插管(33%对19%),需要插入胸管(13.4%对4.3%),并接受输血(29%对17%)。两组的脊柱骨折、头部损伤和实体器官损伤发生率相当。胸骨柄、锁骨和肩胛骨骨折、肺挫伤、血胸和气胸在有肋骨骨折的患者中明显更常见。有肋骨骨折的患者住院时间延长(P = 0.008)。有肋骨骨折的患者总体死亡率更高,但无统计学意义(5.0%对3.2%)。
胸骨骨折罕见,发现相关损伤需要高度怀疑。胸部创伤后,胸骨和肋骨联合骨折在相对年长的患者中更明显。这种组合有一定的临床意义,需要进一步的前瞻性研究。