Suppr超能文献

商业和非商业轻型机动车驾驶员噪声暴露的听觉影响:勒克瑙市的一项比较横断面研究。

Auditory effect of noise exposures among commercial and non-commercial light motor vehicle drivers: A comparative cross-sectional study in Lucknow city.

作者信息

Manar Manish K, Verma Veerendra, Mohan Uday, Shukla Sheo P, Singh Shivendra K

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine and Public Health, KG Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, KG Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Jun;8(6):2023-2028. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_220_19.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Noise-induced hearing loss, one of the most common and preventable occupational hazard, occurs due to repeated and continuous exposure of loud noise, A single exposure of an impulse of noise at the level of 130--140 dB or long and repeated exposures to loud sounds to an average level of 85 dB or higher for an 8-h period can cause permanent loss of hearing.

AIMS

To study and compare hearing loss over different audiometric frequencies among autorickshaw and non-commercial institutional personal car drivers.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional comparative study conducted at a tertiary medical college, located in Lucknow during October 2017-November 2018.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The sample size was calculated using EpiInfo7. We took a sample size of 300 drivers, out of which 150 three-wheeler autorickshaw drivers (Tempo), that is, group I and 150 non-commercial car drivers, that is, group II were selected.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

For statistical analysis, "Chi-square test of independence" and student's t-tests were used.

RESULTS

The mean age at which drivers in group I and group II started work was 23.91 ± 7.63 years an d 23.60 ± 5.58 years, respectively. The mean hearing loss in Group I was 21.15 ± 8.65 dB and in group II it was 13.34 ± 5.79 dB.

CONCLUSIONS

Autorickshaw drivers who were exposed to louder noise, that is, autorickshaw drivers in group I had more sensory neural hearing loss than the non-commercial car drivers, that is, group II.

摘要

背景

噪声性听力损失是最常见且可预防的职业危害之一,它是由于长期反复暴露于高强度噪声所致。单次暴露于130 - 140分贝的脉冲噪声,或长时间反复暴露于平均强度达85分贝及以上的噪声中8小时,都可能导致永久性听力丧失。

目的

研究并比较人力三轮车和非商业机构私家车司机在不同听力频率下的听力损失情况。

设置与设计

这是一项横断面比较研究,于2017年10月至2018年11月在勒克瑙的一所三级医学院进行。

方法与材料

使用EpiInfo7计算样本量。我们选取了300名司机作为样本,其中150名三轮人力车司机(即第一组)和150名非商业私家车司机(即第二组)。

所用统计分析方法

采用“独立性卡方检验”和学生t检验进行统计分析。

结果

第一组和第二组司机开始工作的平均年龄分别为23.91 ± 7.63岁和23.60 ± 5.58岁。第一组的平均听力损失为21.15 ± 8.65分贝,第二组为13.34 ± 5.79分贝。

结论

暴露于更强噪声的人力三轮车司机,即第一组司机,比非商业私家车司机,即第二组司机,有更多的感音神经性听力损失。

相似文献

6
Noise induced hearing loss risk assessment in truck drivers.卡车司机噪声性听力损失风险评估
Noise Health. 2010 Jan-Mar;12(46):49-55. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.59999.
8
Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.预防职业性噪声性听力损失的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 7;7(7):CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub4.

本文引用的文献

2
Cellular mechanisms of noise-induced hearing loss.噪声性听力损失的细胞机制。
Hear Res. 2017 Jun;349:129-137. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.11.013. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
4
Hearing Impairment and High Blood Pressure among Bus Drivers in Puducherry.本地治里公交司机的听力损伤与高血压
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Feb;10(2):CC08-10. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17361.7199. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
6
How to build an inner hair cell: challenges for regeneration.如何构建内毛细胞:再生面临的挑战。
Hear Res. 2007 May;227(1-2):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.12.005. Epub 2006 Dec 16.
10
Patterns of hair cell damage after intense auditory stimulation.强烈听觉刺激后毛细胞损伤的模式。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1969 Dec;78(6):1144-68. doi: 10.1177/000348946907800602.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验