Suppr超能文献

一项关于分剂量3L聚乙二醇灌洗液、2L聚乙二醇灌洗联合蓖麻油以及1L聚乙二醇灌洗联合蓖麻油和维生素C用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的随机试验。

A Randomized Trial of Split Dose 3 L Polyethylene Glycol Lavage Solution, 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Lavage Combined With Castor Oil, and 1 L of Polyethylene Glycol Lavage Solution Combined With Castor Oil and Ascorbic Acid for Preparation for Colonoscopy.

作者信息

Tian Xu, Shi Bing, Liu Xiao-Ling, Chen Hui, Chen Wei-Qing

机构信息

Key Laboratory for Biorheological Science and Technology, Department of Gastroenterology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing Cancer Institute, Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing University, Ministry of Education, Chongqing, China.

Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized Treatment, Department of Gastroenterology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing Cancer Institute, Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Jul 5;6:158. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00158. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Castor oil (CaO) has the potential of halving the required volume of bowel preparation solution; however, no clinical trial investigated the efficacy of CaO on bowel preparation for colonoscopy in addition to polyethylene glycol (PEG). Our aim was to evaluate efficacy and safety of lower dose PEG together with 30 mL CaO alone or plus ascorbic acid (Asc) in bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Two hundred and forty-six patients were allocated randomly to ingest 2 L PEG with 30 mL CaO, 1 L PEG with 30 mL CaO plus 5 g Asc, or 3 L PEG. We used Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) to evaluate bowel preparation efficacy. We also determined other outcomes such as procedure time, polyp or adenoma detection rate, and adverse events (AEs). Of 282 patients recruited, 36 were excluded. Groups were matched for baseline characteristics except weight ( = 0.020) and body mass index (BMI) ( = 0.003). Patient's satisfaction was higher in 2 L PEG-CaO ( = 0.016) and 1 L PEG-CaO-Asc groups ( = 0·017). Patients' compliance was 67.5, 71.4, and 80.5% in 3 L PEG, 2 L PEG-CaO, and 1 L PEG-CaO-Asc groups ( = 0.014). Adequate bowel preparation rate was 75, 78.57, and 53.66% in 3 L PEG, 2 L PEG-CaO, and 1 L PEG-CaO-Asc groups ( = 0.021). There were no differences in terms of remaining outcomes. Despite an increase in patients' satisfaction and compliance, 1 L PEG-CaO-Asc significantly decreased adequate bowel preparation rate. However, 2 L PEG-CaO improved the patients' satisfaction and compliance and increased adequate bowel preparation rate (Registration number, ChiCTR-IIR-17012418).

摘要

蓖麻油(CaO)有可能将肠道准备溶液所需体积减半;然而,尚无临床试验研究CaO除聚乙二醇(PEG)外对结肠镜检查肠道准备的疗效。我们的目的是评估低剂量PEG联合30 mL单独的CaO或加抗坏血酸(Asc)在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的疗效和安全性。246例患者被随机分配摄入2 L PEG加30 mL CaO、1 L PEG加30 mL CaO加5 g Asc或3 L PEG。我们使用波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)评估肠道准备疗效。我们还确定了其他结果,如操作时间、息肉或腺瘤检出率以及不良事件(AE)。在招募的282例患者中,36例被排除。除体重(P = 0.020)和体重指数(BMI)(P = 0.003)外,各组基线特征匹配。2 L PEG-CaO组(P = 0.016)和1 L PEG-CaO-Asc组(P = 0.017)患者的满意度更高。3 L PEG组、2 L PEG-CaO组和1 L PEG-CaO-Asc组患者的依从性分别为67.5%、71.4%和80.5%(P = 0.014)。3 L PEG组、2 L PEG-CaO组和1 L PEG-CaO-Asc组的充分肠道准备率分别为75%、78.57%和53.66%(P = 0.021)。其余结果无差异。尽管患者满意度和依从性有所提高,但1 L PEG-CaO-Asc显著降低了充分肠道准备率。然而,2 L PEG-CaO提高了患者的满意度和依从性,并提高了充分肠道准备率(注册号,ChiCTR-IIR-17012418)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e6/6624777/5023466cd34b/fmed-06-00158-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验