Researcher, The Fafo Institute for Labour and Social Research, Norway.
Researcher, Chinese Academy of Science and Technology for Development, China.
Disasters. 2020 Oct;44(4):687-707. doi: 10.1111/disa.12393. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
This paper examines the vulnerability of households to disasters, using an asset vulnerability framework to represent livelihoods. Such frameworks are widely employed to analyse household poverty and focus on living conditions and well-being rather than money-metric measures of consumption and income. The conceptualisation of household vulnerability is a challenge in current studies on coping with disasters. The paper considers whether a capital assets framework is useful in identifying and assessing household vulnerability in the context of the Wenchuan earthquake in China in 2008. The framework has five categories of assets (financial, human, natural, physical, and social capital) and attempts to measure the resilience and vulnerability of households. When applied to a major disaster, asset-based methods face the problem of heterogeneity of the population, such as with regard to livelihood type or residence. Moreover, the effect of external interventions, such as the provision of relief assistance, must be taken into account.
本文利用资产脆弱性框架来代表生计,考察了家庭在灾害面前的脆弱性。此类框架广泛应用于分析家庭贫困问题,关注的是生活条件和福祉,而不是衡量消费和收入的货币指标。在应对灾害的当前研究中,家庭脆弱性的概念化是一个挑战。本文考虑了在 2008 年中国汶川地震的背景下,资本资产框架是否有助于识别和评估家庭脆弱性。该框架有五类资产(金融、人力、自然、物质和社会资本),并试图衡量家庭的弹性和脆弱性。当应用于重大灾害时,基于资产的方法面临人口异质性的问题,例如生计类型或住所。此外,还必须考虑外部干预措施的影响,如提供救济援助。