Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics.
Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2019 Dec;43(12):1591-1599. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001328.
The PROMISE diagnostic algorithm, which uses p53, mismatch repair (MMR) protein immunohistochemistry, and DNA polymerase ε (POLE) exonuclease domain mutation testing, is a reliable surrogate of the molecular group in endometrial carcinoma. Its prognostic value has been validated in endometrial carcinoma and ovarian endometrioid carcinoma. Moreover, a similar prognostic grouping has been recently documented in endometrial clear cell carcinoma. Thus, we aimed to explore the role of these markers in ovarian clear cell carcinoma, another endometriosis-associated malignancy. A total of 90 cases were identified and confirmed after secondary review. Immunohistochemistry for p53, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 was performed in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. POLE mutational analysis was performed in 47 cases. Results were correlated with clinicopathologic variables including disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival, and disease-specific survival (DSS). Endometriosis was found in 67 (74%) cases. Six (7%) tumors were p53 abnormal, 82 (91%) were p53 normal, and 2 (2%) tumors had MMR deficiency (1 MSH6 loss and 1 MSH2/6 loss; both were p53 normal). Several POLE variants of unknown significance were detected, but no pathogenic mutations. The mean follow-up period was 43 months (median: 34, range: 1 to 189). Abnormal p53 status was associated with advanced Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, lymph node metastases, DFS and DSS (P<0.05, Fisher exact test). In univariate analysis, abnormal p53 and positive lymph node status had worse DFS, whereas bilaterality, surface involvement, and advanced stage were associated with worse DFS, overall survival and DSS (P<0.05, Cox regression). On multivariate analysis, only stage retained statistical association with survival. Using a molecular-based approach designed for endometrial carcinoma, most ovarian clear cell carcinomas fall into the copy-number-low molecular subgroup. However, a small but important subset has an abnormal p53 expression (copy-number-high group). This subset is associated with adverse features including extrapelvic disease, nodal metastases, and recurrence similar to endometrial and ovarian endometrioid cancer. Thus, testing for this marker has potential prognostic significance. The role of other markers in the PROMISE algorithm remains to be elucidated, as we found a low frequency of MMR abnormalities and no pathogenic POLE mutations in our series.
PROMISE 诊断算法使用 p53、错配修复 (MMR) 蛋白免疫组化和 DNA 聚合酶 ε (POLE) 外切酶结构域突变检测,是子宫内膜癌分子分组的可靠替代方法。其预后价值已在子宫内膜癌和卵巢子宫内膜样癌中得到验证。此外,最近在子宫内膜透明细胞癌中也记录了类似的预后分组。因此,我们旨在探讨这些标志物在另一种子宫内膜异位症相关恶性肿瘤卵巢透明细胞癌中的作用。经过二次审查,共确定并确认了 90 例。对福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋组织进行 p53、MLH1、MSH2、MSH6 和 PMS2 的免疫组织化学染色。对 47 例进行了 POLE 突变分析。结果与无病生存 (DFS)、总生存和疾病特异性生存 (DSS) 等临床病理变量相关。在 67 例 (74%)中发现子宫内膜异位症。6 例 (7%)肿瘤存在 p53 异常,82 例 (91%)肿瘤 p53 正常,2 例 (2%)肿瘤存在 MMR 缺陷 (1 例 MSH6 缺失,1 例 MSH2/6 缺失;两者均为 p53 正常)。检测到几种意义不明的 POLE 变体,但没有致病性突变。平均随访时间为 43 个月 (中位数:34,范围:1 至 189)。异常 p53 状态与 FIGO 晚期、淋巴结转移、DFS 和 DSS 相关 (P<0.05,Fisher 确切检验)。在单因素分析中,异常 p53 和阳性淋巴结状态与较差的 DFS 相关,而双侧性、表面受累和晚期与较差的 DFS、总生存和 DSS 相关 (P<0.05,Cox 回归)。在多因素分析中,只有分期与生存仍有统计学关联。使用为子宫内膜癌设计的基于分子的方法,大多数卵巢透明细胞癌归入低拷贝数肿瘤亚组。然而,一个重要但很小的亚组存在异常 p53 表达 (高拷贝数组)。该亚组与类似子宫内膜癌和卵巢子宫内膜样癌的不良特征相关,包括盆外疾病、淋巴结转移和复发。因此,检测该标志物具有潜在的预后意义。在我们的研究中,PROMISE 算法中的其他标志物异常的频率较低,并且没有发现致病性 POLE 突变,因此它们的作用仍有待阐明。