Thilakarathne Iresha K, Ratnayake Palitha, Vithanage Anoma, Sugathadasa Dammika P
Department of Pathology, Teaching Hospital, Kandy, Sri Lanka.
Am J Dermatopathol. 2019 Aug;41(8):566-570. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000001367.
Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) displays a spectrum of manifestations clinically and histologically. Then, it becomes a diagnostic challenge and must discern from the other clinical and histological mimics, especially when the Leishman-Donovan bodies are inattentive. In this study, we compared the distinguishing histomorphological characteristics of CL against the other skin diseases with similar clinical and histological features. Skin biopsies of 181 patients, which suspect CL clinically, are evaluated histologically. Pertaining to the first case-control comparison, which performed between skin lesions of CL with or without discernible organisms and the other granulomatous dermatitis, highlighted that the ill-formed coalescent granulomata (OR = 14.83) and diffuse dense dermal plasma cell infiltrate (OR = 74.25) are significantly associated with the skin lesions of CL. The second case-control analysis was between CL without discernible organisms and the other granulomatous dermatitis, and identified a significant association in the presence of ill-formed coalescent granulomata (OR = 16.94) and diffuse dense (>50/HPF) dermal plasma cell infiltrate (OR = 74.5) in the skin lesions of CL. Pertaining to epidermal changes, acanthosis (OR = 2.38), spongiosis (OR = 9.13), and the presence of ulceration (OR = 20.26) are among the major concerns in CL. In conclusion, in the presence of clinical suspicion, dermal granulomata in ill-formed coalescent morphology with high plasma cell density in a diffuse arrangement are positive factors for the diagnosis of CL, especially when the discernible Leishmania amastigotes are absent. Resource utilization such as polymerase chain reaction and other ancillary techniques during the diagnosis of CL can be minimized by using a range of histopathological features and special attention should be focused on this in the future.
皮肤利什曼病(CL)在临床和组织学上表现出一系列症状。因此,它成为一项诊断挑战,必须与其他临床和组织学上的相似病症相鉴别,尤其是当利什曼-多诺万小体不明显时。在本研究中,我们比较了CL与其他具有相似临床和组织学特征的皮肤病的显著组织形态学特征。对181例临床疑似CL患者的皮肤活检进行了组织学评估。关于第一项病例对照比较,即在有或无可辨认病原体的CL皮肤病变与其他肉芽肿性皮炎之间进行的比较,结果表明,形态不佳的融合性肉芽肿(OR = 14.83)和弥漫性致密真皮浆细胞浸润(OR = 74.25)与CL皮肤病变显著相关。第二项病例对照分析是在无可辨认病原体的CL与其他肉芽肿性皮炎之间进行的,结果发现在CL皮肤病变中存在形态不佳的融合性肉芽肿(OR = 16.94)和弥漫性致密(>50/HPF)真皮浆细胞浸润(OR = 74.5)存在显著关联。关于表皮变化,棘层肥厚(OR = 2.38)、海绵形成(OR = 9.13)和溃疡的存在(OR = 20.26)是CL的主要关注点。总之,在临床怀疑的情况下,形态不佳的融合形态且浆细胞密度高呈弥漫性分布的真皮肉芽肿是诊断CL的积极因素,尤其是在无可辨认的利什曼无鞭毛体时。通过使用一系列组织病理学特征,可以在CL诊断过程中尽量减少聚合酶链反应和其他辅助技术等资源的使用,未来应特别关注这一点。