M.W. Harbell is adjunct assistant professor, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, and senior associate consultant, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4210-0942. D. Li is professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4228-4617. C. Boscardin is associate professor, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California. E. Pierluissi is professor, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California. K.E. Hauer is associate dean for assessment and professor, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8812-4045.
Acad Med. 2020 Jan;95(1):136-144. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002886.
Despite increasing emphasis in medical school education on quality and systems improvement, many medical schools lack sufficient faculty with expertise to teach systems improvement. Using the pedagogical content knowledge framework, this study explores how faculty engage students in systems improvement work and faculty perceptions of the outcomes for the health system and students.
In May-June 2017, the authors interviewed 12 of 13 invited faculty with experience in teaching and engaging first-year medical students in systems improvement work, the course of students' systems improvement work over time, the impact of students' projects on health systems, and students' learning and attitudes about systems improvement. The authors conducted qualitative analysis iteratively with data collection to sufficiency.
Six emergent themes characterized faculty's approach to guiding students in systems improvement work: faculty-student relationship, faculty role, student role, faculty-student shared responsibility for projects, faculty and student content knowledge, and project outcomes. The faculty-student relationship was foundational for successful systems improvement work. Faculty roles included project selection, project management, and health systems interactions. Students engaged in systems improvement as their faculty leveraged their knowledge and skills and created meaningful student roles. Faculty and students shared responsibility and colearned systems improvement content knowledge. Faculty defined successful outcomes as students' learning about the systems improvement process and interprofessional collaboration.
Findings highlight the critical importance of pedagogical content knowledge to engage early learners in systems improvement work, understand their learning interests and needs, and manage their projects longitudinally.
尽管医学院校教育越来越强调质量和系统改进,但许多医学院校缺乏足够的、具有教授系统改进专长的师资。本研究运用教学内容知识框架,探讨了教师如何引导学生参与系统改进工作,以及教师对卫生系统和学生的成果的看法。
2017 年 5 月至 6 月,作者对 13 名受邀教师中的 12 名进行了访谈,这些教师具有教授和引导一年级医学生进行系统改进工作的经验,包括学生系统改进工作随时间的变化过程、学生项目对卫生系统的影响,以及学生对系统改进的学习和态度。作者在数据收集达到充分性的基础上,进行了迭代式的定性分析。
有 6 个突出的主题体现了教师指导学生进行系统改进工作的方法:师生关系、教师角色、学生角色、师生共同承担项目责任、师生共同的项目内容知识和项目成果。师生关系是系统改进工作成功的基础。教师的角色包括项目选择、项目管理和卫生系统互动。学生通过利用教师的知识和技能并创造有意义的学生角色来参与系统改进。教师和学生共同承担责任并共同学习系统改进的内容知识。教师将成功的结果定义为学生学习系统改进过程和跨专业合作。
研究结果突出了教学内容知识对于让早期学习者参与系统改进工作、了解他们的学习兴趣和需求以及对其项目进行纵向管理的重要性。