Graff Crystal J, Kaljo Kristina, Treat Robert W, Dielentheis Kate
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin,
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
WMJ. 2021 Apr;120(1):8-16.
Medical schools historically have utilized instructor-centered lectures to teach medical students the basic sciences. Several commercial electronic-based resources are now available to enhance lecture-based content. This study examines perceptions between students and faculty regarding the efficacy of lecture-based teaching and learning strategies used by students overall.
The authors distributed surveys to medical students and basic science teaching faculty at the Medical College of Wisconsin. Survey items used categorical and 10-point scales and open-ended text response. Mean scores were compared with independent t tests and Cohen effect sizes. Pearson () and Spearman rho (ρ) correlations were used for relational analysis. IBM SPSS 24.0 was used for statistical analysis, NVivo 11 was used for qualitative analysis.
Faculty's perception of meeting students' learning needs was rated significantly higher (mean [SD] = 7.3 [1.3]) than students (5.9 [2.0]) (Cohen = 1.0/ < .001). There was a significant negative correlation between lectures meeting students' learning needs and time students spent outside of lecture seeking supplemental learning resources (ρ = -0.4/ < .001). Students highlighted their use of personal learning strategies, desire for equitable access to resources, and preparation for national board examinations. Faculty emphasized their perceptions of learning resources, recognition of learning styles, time restrictions, and desire to utilize diverse teaching methods.
Student and faculty perceptions regarding student learning needs were significantly different. Students use lectures extensively, but additionally add to the financial burden of medical school by personally funding supplemental resources. This study helps bridge the gap between medical students and faculty regarding what educational tools are best suited to support a student population with increasingly diverse learning needs.
从历史上看,医学院校一直采用以教师为中心的讲座来向医学生传授基础科学知识。现在有几种基于电子的商业资源可用于增强基于讲座的内容。本研究考察了学生和教师对学生整体使用的基于讲座的教学和学习策略的有效性的看法。
作者向威斯康星医学院的医学生和基础科学教学教师发放了调查问卷。调查项目使用了分类量表、10分制量表和开放式文本回答。平均得分通过独立t检验和科恩效应量进行比较。使用皮尔逊(Pearson)相关系数和斯皮尔曼等级相关系数(Spearman rho)进行相关性分析。使用IBM SPSS 24.0进行统计分析,使用NVivo 11进行定性分析。
教师对满足学生学习需求的感知评分(均值[标准差]=7.3[1.3])显著高于学生(5.9[2.0])(科恩效应量=1.0,P<0.001)。讲座满足学生学习需求与学生在讲座之外花费时间寻找补充学习资源之间存在显著负相关(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数ρ=-0.4,P<0.001)。学生强调了他们个人学习策略的使用、对资源公平获取的渴望以及为国家委员会考试做准备。教师则强调了他们对学习资源的看法、对学习风格的认识、时间限制以及使用多种教学方法的愿望。
学生和教师对学生学习需求的看法存在显著差异。学生广泛使用讲座,但通过个人资助补充资源,这也增加了医学院校的经济负担。本研究有助于弥合医学生和教师之间在何种教育工具最适合支持学习需求日益多样化的学生群体方面的差距。