Suppr超能文献

评估超重和肥胖个体减肥动机的工具:系统评价和叙述性综合。

Instruments for evaluation of motivations for weight loss in individuals with overweight and obesity: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

机构信息

Postgraduate Program in Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.

Department of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jul 23;14(7):e0220104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220104. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

This systematic review aims to identify instruments used to assess motivations for weight loss in individuals with overweight and obesity from different age groups, such as children, adolescents, adults, and older adults. The virtual search was carried out using the PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, and ADOLEC databases, and by manual search. The following descriptors were used: questionnaire, scale, instrument, evaluation, motivation, motive, reason, "lose weight," "losing weight," "weight loss," and slimming. Methodological quality was assessed according to the criteria of the COSMIN checklist. The search yielded 3,524 results, seven of which were included in the review. Six questionnaires assessing motivations for weight loss, which could be applied to various age groups, were identified. All the questionnaires presented items related to appearance and health as the main motivation for weight loss. In addition to these motivations, the questionnaires also included items related to improved sports performance, self-confidence, participation in important social events, family and social pressure, and fitting into different clothes. The most evaluated measurement properties in the studies were internal consistency, reliability, content validity, and construct validity. Regarding internal consistency, one was rated as excellent, one as fair, and three as poor. For reliability, two were rated as being of fair quality, and one as of poor quality. Two studies analyzed the content validity and the questionnaires were rated as being of poor methodological quality. Regarding structural validity, one was rated as excellent, another as fair, and another as poor quality. Only the Weight Loss Motivation Questionnaire presented excellent methodological quality for most of the analyzed criteria. There is a need to develop questionnaires that are of better methodological quality to assess motivations for weight loss. Instruments targeting the adolescent population should also be developed.

摘要

本系统评价旨在确定评估超重和肥胖个体减肥动机的工具,这些个体来自不同的年龄组,如儿童、青少年、成年人和老年人。虚拟搜索使用了 PubMed、Scopus、LILACS 和 ADOLEC 数据库,并进行了手动搜索。使用了以下描述符:问卷、量表、工具、评估、动机、动机、原因、“减肥”、“减重”、“体重减轻”和“减肥”。根据 COSMIN 清单的标准评估了方法学质量。搜索产生了 3524 个结果,其中有 7 个被纳入了综述。确定了 6 个评估减肥动机的问卷,这些问卷可应用于不同的年龄组。所有的问卷都有与外观和健康相关的项目作为减肥的主要动机。除了这些动机外,问卷还包括与提高运动表现、自信、参与重要社会活动、家庭和社会压力以及适合不同衣服有关的项目。在研究中评估最多的测量特性是内部一致性、可靠性、内容有效性和结构有效性。在内部一致性方面,一个被评为优秀,一个被评为中等,三个被评为较差。在可靠性方面,两个被评为中等质量,一个被评为较差质量。有两个研究分析了内容有效性,问卷被评为方法学质量较差。关于结构有效性,一个被评为优秀,另一个被评为中等,另一个被评为较差。只有减肥动机问卷在大多数分析标准中具有优秀的方法学质量。需要开发具有更好方法学质量的问卷来评估减肥动机。还应该开发针对青少年群体的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a0/6650081/55ade5d733b6/pone.0220104.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验